Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Diana Cruz
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Vasconcellos Sobrinho, Mário, Vasconcellos, Ana Maria de Albuquerque
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407
Resumo: The article discusses advocacy coalition formation and the roles of key actors in science, technology and innovation (ST&I) policies for social inclusion in a subnational context. The policy subsystem category and concept of advocacy coalition are used in the context of the advocacy coalition framework and address the need to understand the influences of key actors (policy broker and policy entrepreneur) on it. The policy subsystem was outlined using case-oriented research and the discourse was analyzed in order to understand the policy actors’ beliefs. The analysis of two cases of ST&I policy processes for social inclusion (assistive technology and social technology) highlighted policy broker and policy entrepreneur key roles in the emergence of policy subsystems, but had different effects on advocacy coalition formation. The policy entrepreneur had a closer relationship with advocacy coalition building when setting up regular mechanisms to share beliefs and policy-oriented learning, as well as taking initiatives to coordinate the collective action of members in the early advocacy coalition. Although relevant in agenda setting and maintaining a specific social inclusion agenda in the policy process, the policy broker did not achieve a positive relationship with advocacy coalition building. The article corroborates the possibility of incorporating the concept of policy entrepreneur in analyses of the advocacy coalition framework and highlights this actor’s characteristics through this analytical model.
id FGV-4_c008a151e039ddc42f5d19eda306df18
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82407
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policyFormación de coaliciones de defensa y actores clave dentro de la políticaFormação de coalizão de defesa e atores chaves da políticapolicy processadvocacy coalition frameworkpublic policy of science and technology for social inclusionsocial technologyassistive technologyproceso de políticas públicasmodelo de coalición de defensapolítica pública de ciencia y tecnología para la inclusión socialtecnología socialtecnología de la rehabilitaciónprocesso de políticas públicasmodelo de coalizão de defesapolítica pública de ciência e tecnologia para inclusão socialtecnologia socialtecnologia assistivaThe article discusses advocacy coalition formation and the roles of key actors in science, technology and innovation (ST&I) policies for social inclusion in a subnational context. The policy subsystem category and concept of advocacy coalition are used in the context of the advocacy coalition framework and address the need to understand the influences of key actors (policy broker and policy entrepreneur) on it. The policy subsystem was outlined using case-oriented research and the discourse was analyzed in order to understand the policy actors’ beliefs. The analysis of two cases of ST&I policy processes for social inclusion (assistive technology and social technology) highlighted policy broker and policy entrepreneur key roles in the emergence of policy subsystems, but had different effects on advocacy coalition formation. The policy entrepreneur had a closer relationship with advocacy coalition building when setting up regular mechanisms to share beliefs and policy-oriented learning, as well as taking initiatives to coordinate the collective action of members in the early advocacy coalition. Although relevant in agenda setting and maintaining a specific social inclusion agenda in the policy process, the policy broker did not achieve a positive relationship with advocacy coalition building. The article corroborates the possibility of incorporating the concept of policy entrepreneur in analyses of the advocacy coalition framework and highlights this actor’s characteristics through this analytical model.El artículo analiza la formación de coaliciones de defensa y los roles de los actores clave en las políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación (PCTI) para la inclusión social en un contexto subnacional. Considerando el modelo de coalición de defensa (MCD), se utilizaron como referencia las categorías analíticas del subsistema de la política y de la coalición de defensa, para comprender las influencias de los actores clave, específicamente del policy broker (intermediario) y del emprendedor de políticas. El subsistema de la política se delimitó mediante el método de investigación basado en casos y se usó el análisis del discurso para comprender las creencias de los actores en la política. El análisis de dos casos del proceso de la PCTI para la inclusión social (tecnología social y tecnología de la rehabilitación) resaltó los roles de los actores clave en la aparición de subsistemas de la política, sin embargo tuvieron diferentes efectos en la formación de coaliciones de defensa. El emprendedor de políticas tuvo una mayor relación con la formación de una coalición de defensa al establecer mecanismos regulares para comunicar sus posiciones y aprendizajes orientados a la política, así como al tomar iniciativas para coordinar la acción colectiva en la naciente coalición de defensa. El policy broker no logró una relación positiva con la formación de las coaliciones de defensa analizadas, pero sí fue relevante para el establecimiento de la agenda y la permanencia de la pauta de inclusión social en el proceso de la política. Este trabajo corrobora la posibilidad de incorporar el concepto de emprendedor de política en los análisis de MDC y señala las características de este actor clave en el modelo analítico estudiado.O artigo discute a formação de coalizão de defesa e o papel de atores chaves em políticas de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CT&I) para inclusão social em um contexto subnacional. No âmbito do Modelo de Coalizão de Defesa (MCD), utilizou-se as categorias analíticas do subsistema da política e da coalizão de defesa como referência e buscou-se compreender as influências de atores chaves nestas, especificamente o policy broker (mediador) e o empreendedor de política. O subsistema de política foi delimitado pelo método de pesquisa baseada em caso e a análise de discurso foi mobilizada para compreender as crenças dos atores da política. A análise de dois casos do processo de política de CT&I para inclusão social (tecnologia social e tecnologia assistiva) realçou os papéis de atores chaves na emergência dos subsistemas de política, porém estes tiveram diferentes efeitos sobre a formação de coalizões de defesa. O empreendedor da política teve maior relação com a formação de coalizão de defesa ao estabelecer mecanismos regulares para compartilhamento de crenças e aprendizados orientados para a política, bem como ao tomar iniciativas de coordenação da ação coletiva na coalizão de defesa nascente. O policy broker não alcançou relação positiva substancial com a formação das coalizões de defesa analisadas, embora tenha sido relevante para o agenda-setting e a permanência da pauta de inclusão social no processo da política. O artigo corrobora com a possibilidade de incorporação do conceito de empreendedor de política em análises do MDC e aponta características deste ator chave iluminadas pelo modelo analítico.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2020-11-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8240710.1590/0034-761220190450Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 6 (2020): Agenda setting: policy change and policy dynamics; 1711-1728Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 6 (2020): Agenda Setting: cambios y dinámica de las políticas públicas; 1711-1728Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 6 (2020): Agenda setting: mudanças e a dinâmica das políticas públicas; 1711-17281982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407/78411https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407/pdf_417Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Diana CruzVasconcellos Sobrinho, MárioVasconcellos, Ana Maria de Albuquerque2021-07-06T20:29:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82407Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-07-06T20:29Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
Formación de coaliciones de defensa y actores clave dentro de la política
Formação de coalizão de defesa e atores chaves da política
title Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
spellingShingle Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
Rodrigues, Diana Cruz
policy process
advocacy coalition framework
public policy of science and technology for social inclusion
social technology
assistive technology
proceso de políticas públicas
modelo de coalición de defensa
política pública de ciencia y tecnología para la inclusión social
tecnología social
tecnología de la rehabilitación
processo de políticas públicas
modelo de coalizão de defesa
política pública de ciência e tecnologia para inclusão social
tecnologia social
tecnologia assistiva
title_short Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
title_full Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
title_fullStr Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
title_full_unstemmed Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
title_sort Advocacy coalition formation and key actors within the policy
author Rodrigues, Diana Cruz
author_facet Rodrigues, Diana Cruz
Vasconcellos Sobrinho, Mário
Vasconcellos, Ana Maria de Albuquerque
author_role author
author2 Vasconcellos Sobrinho, Mário
Vasconcellos, Ana Maria de Albuquerque
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Diana Cruz
Vasconcellos Sobrinho, Mário
Vasconcellos, Ana Maria de Albuquerque
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv policy process
advocacy coalition framework
public policy of science and technology for social inclusion
social technology
assistive technology
proceso de políticas públicas
modelo de coalición de defensa
política pública de ciencia y tecnología para la inclusión social
tecnología social
tecnología de la rehabilitación
processo de políticas públicas
modelo de coalizão de defesa
política pública de ciência e tecnologia para inclusão social
tecnologia social
tecnologia assistiva
topic policy process
advocacy coalition framework
public policy of science and technology for social inclusion
social technology
assistive technology
proceso de políticas públicas
modelo de coalición de defensa
política pública de ciencia y tecnología para la inclusión social
tecnología social
tecnología de la rehabilitación
processo de políticas públicas
modelo de coalizão de defesa
política pública de ciência e tecnologia para inclusão social
tecnologia social
tecnologia assistiva
description The article discusses advocacy coalition formation and the roles of key actors in science, technology and innovation (ST&I) policies for social inclusion in a subnational context. The policy subsystem category and concept of advocacy coalition are used in the context of the advocacy coalition framework and address the need to understand the influences of key actors (policy broker and policy entrepreneur) on it. The policy subsystem was outlined using case-oriented research and the discourse was analyzed in order to understand the policy actors’ beliefs. The analysis of two cases of ST&I policy processes for social inclusion (assistive technology and social technology) highlighted policy broker and policy entrepreneur key roles in the emergence of policy subsystems, but had different effects on advocacy coalition formation. The policy entrepreneur had a closer relationship with advocacy coalition building when setting up regular mechanisms to share beliefs and policy-oriented learning, as well as taking initiatives to coordinate the collective action of members in the early advocacy coalition. Although relevant in agenda setting and maintaining a specific social inclusion agenda in the policy process, the policy broker did not achieve a positive relationship with advocacy coalition building. The article corroborates the possibility of incorporating the concept of policy entrepreneur in analyses of the advocacy coalition framework and highlights this actor’s characteristics through this analytical model.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407
10.1590/0034-761220190450
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0034-761220190450
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407/78411
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82407/pdf_417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 6 (2020): Agenda setting: policy change and policy dynamics; 1711-1728
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 6 (2020): Agenda Setting: cambios y dinámica de las políticas públicas; 1711-1728
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 6 (2020): Agenda setting: mudanças e a dinâmica das políticas públicas; 1711-1728
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943774254039040

Registros relacionados