Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1998 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738 |
Resumo: | Since the earIy 90's the definition of public policies in Brazil has included a discussion about coordination and commitment issues which happen to discourage the search for industty-wide competitiveness. Whereas the initial scope of the new guidelines laid stress on research privatization as well as on the purpose of promoting both high-tech and basic technoIogy orientedresearch, from the mid-90's on policymakers started focussing on the objective of restructuring the technoIogica1ly mature industries by means of acquiring (foreign) technoIogy. By Iooking into the US experience, there is evidence that research privatization has implied discouraging broad-use technoIogiesas we11 as jeopardizing the efficient running of behavioral norms and of reward systems as related to the organization of research. According to this paper's authOl; recent work on the new economics of science and research is crucial to devise new mechanisms and new institutional formats to help designing efficient R&D policies |
id |
FGV-4_c8b86326b7c7a94a720a63ee72c5c46f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/7738 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI viewsDoctrina de la competitividad y las políticas públicas de P&D: evidencia reciente y las contribuciones al debateDoutrina de competitividade e política pública de P&D: evidências recentes e contribuições ao debatedoctrine of competitivenessprivatization of researchefficiency.doctrina de la competitividadprivatización de la investigacióneficiencia.doutrina de competitividadeprivatização da pesquisaeficiência.Since the earIy 90's the definition of public policies in Brazil has included a discussion about coordination and commitment issues which happen to discourage the search for industty-wide competitiveness. Whereas the initial scope of the new guidelines laid stress on research privatization as well as on the purpose of promoting both high-tech and basic technoIogy orientedresearch, from the mid-90's on policymakers started focussing on the objective of restructuring the technoIogica1ly mature industries by means of acquiring (foreign) technoIogy. By Iooking into the US experience, there is evidence that research privatization has implied discouraging broad-use technoIogiesas we11 as jeopardizing the efficient running of behavioral norms and of reward systems as related to the organization of research. According to this paper's authOl; recent work on the new economics of science and research is crucial to devise new mechanisms and new institutional formats to help designing efficient R&D policiesDesde o início dos anos 90 a formulação de políticas públicas no Brasil já registrava a preocupação com os problemas de coordenação e compromisso que desencorajam a busca de competitividade no conjunto da indústria. Enquanto a versão original das novas diretrizes conferia ênfase à privatizaçãoda pesquisa, mas ao mesmo tempo declarava o objetivo de promover as indústrias de ponta e a pesquisa de base tecnológica, a partir de meados desta, década ganha destaque o objetivo de reestruturar os setores produtivos tecnologicamente maduros da indústria através da compra de tecnologiaestrangeira. Quanto à experiência norte-americana, há evidências no sentido de que a privatização da pesquisa resulta em desestímulo ao desenvolvimento das tecnologias de amplo espectro de uso e compromete a eficiência no funcionamento das normas de comportamento e sistemas de recompensa que organizam a pesquisa. Para o autor deste artigo, os resultados da pesquisa recente em economia da ciência podem ser cruciais para a identificação de novos mecanismos e soluções institucionais apropriados à formulação de políticas eficientes de P&D.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)1998-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 32 No. 3 (1998); 135 a 158Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (1998); 135 a 158Revista de Administração Pública; v. 32 n. 3 (1998); 135 a 1581982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738/6334Jorge, Marcelino Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-03-22T13:52:39Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/7738Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2013-03-22T13:52:39Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views Doctrina de la competitividad y las políticas públicas de P&D: evidencia reciente y las contribuciones al debate Doutrina de competitividade e política pública de P&D: evidências recentes e contribuições ao debate |
title |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
spellingShingle |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views Jorge, Marcelino José doctrine of competitiveness privatization of research efficiency. doctrina de la competitividad privatización de la investigación eficiencia. doutrina de competitividade privatização da pesquisa eficiência. |
title_short |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
title_full |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
title_fullStr |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
title_full_unstemmed |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
title_sort |
Competitiveness doctrine and the public policy for R&D: recent evidence and criticaI views |
author |
Jorge, Marcelino José |
author_facet |
Jorge, Marcelino José |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jorge, Marcelino José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
doctrine of competitiveness privatization of research efficiency. doctrina de la competitividad privatización de la investigación eficiencia. doutrina de competitividade privatização da pesquisa eficiência. |
topic |
doctrine of competitiveness privatization of research efficiency. doctrina de la competitividad privatización de la investigación eficiencia. doutrina de competitividade privatização da pesquisa eficiência. |
description |
Since the earIy 90's the definition of public policies in Brazil has included a discussion about coordination and commitment issues which happen to discourage the search for industty-wide competitiveness. Whereas the initial scope of the new guidelines laid stress on research privatization as well as on the purpose of promoting both high-tech and basic technoIogy orientedresearch, from the mid-90's on policymakers started focussing on the objective of restructuring the technoIogica1ly mature industries by means of acquiring (foreign) technoIogy. By Iooking into the US experience, there is evidence that research privatization has implied discouraging broad-use technoIogiesas we11 as jeopardizing the efficient running of behavioral norms and of reward systems as related to the organization of research. According to this paper's authOl; recent work on the new economics of science and research is crucial to devise new mechanisms and new institutional formats to help designing efficient R&D policies |
publishDate |
1998 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1998-03-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7738/6334 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 32 No. 3 (1998); 135 a 158 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (1998); 135 a 158 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 32 n. 3 (1998); 135 a 158 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943767442489344 |