Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732 |
Resumo: | This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era. |
id |
FGV-4_d3d7db9c5091b6770bff121a12f9e96b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6732 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortemO pós-modernismo na administração pública nos EUA: uma autópsiamodernismpostmodernismAmerican public administrationrelativismglobalism.modernismopós-modernismoadministração pública americanarelativismoglobalismo.This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era.Este artigo apresenta uma ¿autópsia¿ crítica do debate entre modernismo e pós-modernismo no campo da administração pública nos EUA, argumentando que o pós-modernismo teria sido simplesmente uma extensão do modernismo e revelado um conjunto de complicações teóricas até então reprimidas na essência da concepção teórica modernista. A similaridade entre as duas escolas de pensamento é analisada em termos de três questões: absurdo radical, auto-referência e niilismo. Embora descritos como essencialmente similares, modernismo e pós-modernismo apontam em direções opostas no que diz respeito à busca de uma base para a governança. No entanto, o advento do globalismo deixa este debate em aberto e sugere que o pós-modernismo seja entendido como alternativa na busca de um paradigma apropriado a esta nova era.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2003); 591 a 604Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 37 Núm. 3 (2003); 591 a 604Revista de Administração Pública; v. 37 n. 3 (2003); 591 a 6041982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732/5314Mcswite, O. C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T21:00:10Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6732Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T21:00:10Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem O pós-modernismo na administração pública nos EUA: uma autópsia |
title |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
spellingShingle |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem Mcswite, O. C. modernism postmodernism American public administration relativism globalism. modernismo pós-modernismo administração pública americana relativismo globalismo. |
title_short |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
title_full |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
title_fullStr |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
title_sort |
Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem |
author |
Mcswite, O. C. |
author_facet |
Mcswite, O. C. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mcswite, O. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
modernism postmodernism American public administration relativism globalism. modernismo pós-modernismo administração pública americana relativismo globalismo. |
topic |
modernism postmodernism American public administration relativism globalism. modernismo pós-modernismo administração pública americana relativismo globalismo. |
description |
This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732/5314 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2003); 591 a 604 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 37 Núm. 3 (2003); 591 a 604 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 37 n. 3 (2003); 591 a 604 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943764490747904 |