Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mcswite, O. C.
Data de Publicação: 2003
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732
Resumo: This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era.
id FGV-4_d3d7db9c5091b6770bff121a12f9e96b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6732
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortemO pós-modernismo na administração pública nos EUA: uma autópsiamodernismpostmodernismAmerican public administrationrelativismglobalism.modernismopós-modernismoadministração pública americanarelativismoglobalismo.This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era.Este artigo apresenta uma ¿autópsia¿ crítica do debate entre modernismo e pós-modernismo no campo da administração pública nos EUA, argumentando que o pós-modernismo teria sido simplesmente uma extensão do modernismo e revelado um conjunto de complicações teóricas até então reprimidas na essência da concepção teórica modernista. A similaridade entre as duas escolas de pensamento é analisada em termos de três questões: absurdo radical, auto-referência e niilismo. Embora descritos como essencialmente similares, modernismo e pós-modernismo apontam em direções opostas no que diz respeito à busca de uma base para a governança. No entanto, o advento do globalismo deixa este debate em aberto e sugere que o pós-modernismo seja entendido como alternativa na busca de um paradigma apropriado a esta nova era.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2003); 591 a 604Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 37 Núm. 3 (2003); 591 a 604Revista de Administração Pública; v. 37 n. 3 (2003); 591 a 6041982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732/5314Mcswite, O. C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T21:00:10Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6732Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T21:00:10Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
O pós-modernismo na administração pública nos EUA: uma autópsia
title Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
spellingShingle Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
Mcswite, O. C.
modernism
postmodernism
American public administration
relativism
globalism.
modernismo
pós-modernismo
administração pública americana
relativismo
globalismo.
title_short Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
title_full Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
title_fullStr Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
title_full_unstemmed Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
title_sort Postmodernism in American public administration: a postmortem
author Mcswite, O. C.
author_facet Mcswite, O. C.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mcswite, O. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv modernism
postmodernism
American public administration
relativism
globalism.
modernismo
pós-modernismo
administração pública americana
relativismo
globalismo.
topic modernism
postmodernism
American public administration
relativism
globalism.
modernismo
pós-modernismo
administração pública americana
relativismo
globalismo.
description This article presents a critical “postmortem” on the debate between modernism and postmodernism in American public administration. It argues that postmodernism was simply an extension of modernism, one that revealed a set of repressed theoretical complications at the core of the modernist framework. The underlying similarity of the two schools of thought is described through analysis of the key issues: radical absurdity, self-referentiality, and nihilism. While depicted as essentially similar, modernism and post-modernism are shown as pointing in opposite directions for finding a basis for governance. The advent of globalism, however, renders the debatemoot and suggests that postmodernism served as a venue for moving toward the paradigm appropriate to this new era.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6732/5314
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2003); 591 a 604
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 37 Núm. 3 (2003); 591 a 604
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 37 n. 3 (2003); 591 a 604
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943764490747904