Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256 |
Resumo: | This study aims to improve the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), which is based on studies related to the application of criteria (Tenório, 2012) to the theoretical field of social management. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2017; Hair et al., 2021). A sample of 213 people from various regions of Brazil responded to an electronic questionnaire after being invited via social media, with emphasis on LinkedIn. In addition to confirming the statistical quality of the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), two indicators proposed for the “participation” construct (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023) were validated. The “deliberative process” construct is still in an exploratory phase, with a test proposition with an additional indicator related to the “cross-cutting spaces” criterion. The validation of additional indicators to the “participation” construct raised its quality above the exploratory zone, as its outer loadings were above 0.7. Therefore, the improvement carried out expands the theoretical and statistical understanding of the model, which can be applied to the various collegiate bodies in public management. |
id |
FGV-4_e6106f0c55c2a936dd946a093a7714fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90256 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicatorsModelo estructural de ciudadanía deliberativa: adición y validación de indicadores de participaciónModelo estrutural de cidadania deliberativa: adição e validação de indicadores de participaçãotransparencyparticipationsocial managementdeliberative citizenshiptransparenciaparticipacióngestión socialciudadanía deliberativatransparênciaparticipaçãogestão socialcidadania deliberativaThis study aims to improve the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), which is based on studies related to the application of criteria (Tenório, 2012) to the theoretical field of social management. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2017; Hair et al., 2021). A sample of 213 people from various regions of Brazil responded to an electronic questionnaire after being invited via social media, with emphasis on LinkedIn. In addition to confirming the statistical quality of the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), two indicators proposed for the “participation” construct (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023) were validated. The “deliberative process” construct is still in an exploratory phase, with a test proposition with an additional indicator related to the “cross-cutting spaces” criterion. The validation of additional indicators to the “participation” construct raised its quality above the exploratory zone, as its outer loadings were above 0.7. Therefore, the improvement carried out expands the theoretical and statistical understanding of the model, which can be applied to the various collegiate bodies in public management.El objetivo de este estudio es mejorar el modelo estructural de ciudadanía deliberativa (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), que se basa en estudios relacionados con la aplicación de criterios (Tenório, 2012) al campo teórico de la gestión social. Los datos se analizaron mediante modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2017; Hair et al., 20211). 213 personas de varios territorios brasileños respondieron el cuestionario electrónico, invitadas a través de las redes sociales, con énfasis en LinkedIn. Además de confirmar la calidad estadística del modelo estructural de ciudadanía deliberativa (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), se validaron dos indicadores propuestos para el constructo participación (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023). El constructo proceso deliberativo aún se encuentra en fase exploratoria, con una propuesta de prueba con un indicador adicional relacionado con el criterio de espacios transversales. La validación de indicadores adicionales al constructo participación elevó su calidad por encima de la zona exploratoria, ya que sus cargas externas fueron superiores a 0,7. De esta forma, la mejora realizada amplía la comprensión teórica y estadística del modelo, pudiendo ser aplicado a los distintos órganos colegiados de la gestión pública.O objetivo deste estudo é aprimorar o modelo estrutural de cidadania deliberativa (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), que tem por base os estudos relativos à aplicação de critérios (Tenório, 2012) ao campo teórico da gestão social. Os dados foram analisados mediante modelagem de equações estruturais (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2017; Hair et al., 2021). Responderam ao questionário eletrônico 213 pessoas de variados territórios brasileiros, convidadas em redes sociais, com destaque para o LinkedIn. Além de ratificar a qualidade estatística do modelo estrutural de cidadania deliberativa (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), validaram-se dois indicadores propostos ao construto “participação” (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023). O construto “processo deliberativo” segue em fase exploratória, tendo uma proposição de teste com um indicador adicional relativo ao critério “espaços de transversalidade”. A validação dos indicadores adicionais ao construto “participação” elevou sua qualidade acima da zona exploratória, pois suas cargas externas ficaram acima de 0,7. Dessa forma, o aprimoramento realizado amplia a compreensão teórica e estatística do modelo, apto a ser aplicado aos diversos órgãos colegiados na gestão pública.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2023-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/9025610.1590/0034-761220230001Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 57 No. 5 (2023); e2023-0001Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 57 Núm. 5 (2023); e2023-0001Revista de Administração Pública; v. 57 n. 5 (2023); e2023-00011982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256/84686https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256/84775Costa, Jhonathan Cavalcante dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-31T18:16:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90256Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2023-10-31T18:16:59Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators Modelo estructural de ciudadanía deliberativa: adición y validación de indicadores de participación Modelo estrutural de cidadania deliberativa: adição e validação de indicadores de participação |
title |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
spellingShingle |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators Costa, Jhonathan Cavalcante da transparency participation social management deliberative citizenship transparencia participación gestión social ciudadanía deliberativa transparência participação gestão social cidadania deliberativa |
title_short |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
title_full |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
title_fullStr |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
title_full_unstemmed |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
title_sort |
Structural model of deliberative citizenship: addition and validation of participation indicators |
author |
Costa, Jhonathan Cavalcante da |
author_facet |
Costa, Jhonathan Cavalcante da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Jhonathan Cavalcante da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
transparency participation social management deliberative citizenship transparencia participación gestión social ciudadanía deliberativa transparência participação gestão social cidadania deliberativa |
topic |
transparency participation social management deliberative citizenship transparencia participación gestión social ciudadanía deliberativa transparência participação gestão social cidadania deliberativa |
description |
This study aims to improve the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), which is based on studies related to the application of criteria (Tenório, 2012) to the theoretical field of social management. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2017; Hair et al., 2021). A sample of 213 people from various regions of Brazil responded to an electronic questionnaire after being invited via social media, with emphasis on LinkedIn. In addition to confirming the statistical quality of the structural model of deliberative citizenship (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023), two indicators proposed for the “participation” construct (Costa & Pinto, 2021, 2023) were validated. The “deliberative process” construct is still in an exploratory phase, with a test proposition with an additional indicator related to the “cross-cutting spaces” criterion. The validation of additional indicators to the “participation” construct raised its quality above the exploratory zone, as its outer loadings were above 0.7. Therefore, the improvement carried out expands the theoretical and statistical understanding of the model, which can be applied to the various collegiate bodies in public management. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256 10.1590/0034-761220230001 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-761220230001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256/84686 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/90256/84775 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 57 No. 5 (2023); e2023-0001 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 57 Núm. 5 (2023); e2023-0001 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 57 n. 5 (2023); e2023-0001 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943775131697152 |