Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580 |
Resumo: | Judicial governance is a multifaceted concept, underexplored in the literature with few empirical studies on this issue that analyze variables that influence it. This article aims to suggest a theoretical-methodological model of judicial governance, whose future application allows data collection to describe and evaluate the validity of the relationship between its constructs and variables in each context. Assumptions of the agency theory and the transaction cost theory, originally addressed to private companies, were incorporated into creation of the model. Procedures for data collection included document analysis and 10 interviews. The suggested model includes the systematization of seven theoretical constructs — accountability, accessibility, independence, resources and structure; governance practices; institutional environment; performance — and variable components of these constructs. |
id |
FGV-4_f18d6f0ab28e3a3858c83720e99c1e86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/51580 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposalGobernanza judicial: propuesta de modelo teórico-metodológicoGovernança judicial: proposta de modelo teórico-metodológicojudicial performancejudicial governanceJudiciarycourt.desempeño judicialgobernanza judicialPoder Judicialtribunal.desempenho judicialgovernança judicialPoder Judiciáriotribunal.Judicial governance is a multifaceted concept, underexplored in the literature with few empirical studies on this issue that analyze variables that influence it. This article aims to suggest a theoretical-methodological model of judicial governance, whose future application allows data collection to describe and evaluate the validity of the relationship between its constructs and variables in each context. Assumptions of the agency theory and the transaction cost theory, originally addressed to private companies, were incorporated into creation of the model. Procedures for data collection included document analysis and 10 interviews. The suggested model includes the systematization of seven theoretical constructs — accountability, accessibility, independence, resources and structure; governance practices; institutional environment; performance — and variable components of these constructs.Gobernanza judicial es un concepto multifacético y son escasos los estudios sobre este tema con los datos empíricos que analizan las variables que influyen en ella. Este artículo tiene como objetivo proponer un modelo teórico-metodológico de gobernanza judicial cuya futura aplicación permita describir y evaluar la validez de la relación entre los constructos que lo conforman en cada contexto. Supuestos de la teoría de la agencia y de la teoría de los costes de transacción, inicialmente dirigidas a las empresas, fueran transpuestos para el modelo. Los procedimientos de la recolección de datos incluyen el análisis de documentos y la realización de 10 entrevistas. El modelo propuesto incluye la sistematización de siete constructos teóricos — accountability; accesibilidad; independencia; recursos y estructura, prácticas de gobernanza; ambiente institucional; desempeño — y las variables componentes de estos constructos.Governança judicial é um conceito multifacetado, pouco explorado na literatura, e são raros os estudos desse tema com dados empíricos que analisem as variáveis que o influenciam. Este artigo tem como objetivo propor um modelo teórico-metodológico de governança judicial, cuja aplicação futura permita a coleta de dados para descrever e avaliar a validade da relação entre os construtos e variáveis que o compõem em cada contexto. Premissas da teoria da agência e da teoria de custos de transação, dirigidas originalmente para empresas, foram transpostas para elaboração do modelo. Os procedimentos de coleta de dados incluíram análise documental e realização de 10 entrevistas. O modelo proposto inclui a sistematização de sete construtos teóricos — accountability; acessibilidade; independência; recursos e estrutura; práticas de governança; ambiente institucional; desempenho — e variáveis componentes desses construtos.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 49 No. 4 (2015); 937 a 958Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 49 Núm. 4 (2015); 937 a 958Revista de Administração Pública; v. 49 n. 4 (2015); 937 a 9581982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580/50363Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAkutsu, LuizGuimarães, Tomás de Aquino2015-08-14T15:38:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/51580Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2015-08-14T15:38:13Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal Gobernanza judicial: propuesta de modelo teórico-metodológico Governança judicial: proposta de modelo teórico-metodológico |
title |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
spellingShingle |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal Akutsu, Luiz judicial performance judicial governance Judiciary court. desempeño judicial gobernanza judicial Poder Judicial tribunal. desempenho judicial governança judicial Poder Judiciário tribunal. |
title_short |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
title_full |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
title_fullStr |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
title_sort |
Judicial governance: a theoretical-methodological model proposal |
author |
Akutsu, Luiz |
author_facet |
Akutsu, Luiz Guimarães, Tomás de Aquino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guimarães, Tomás de Aquino |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Akutsu, Luiz Guimarães, Tomás de Aquino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
judicial performance judicial governance Judiciary court. desempeño judicial gobernanza judicial Poder Judicial tribunal. desempenho judicial governança judicial Poder Judiciário tribunal. |
topic |
judicial performance judicial governance Judiciary court. desempeño judicial gobernanza judicial Poder Judicial tribunal. desempenho judicial governança judicial Poder Judiciário tribunal. |
description |
Judicial governance is a multifaceted concept, underexplored in the literature with few empirical studies on this issue that analyze variables that influence it. This article aims to suggest a theoretical-methodological model of judicial governance, whose future application allows data collection to describe and evaluate the validity of the relationship between its constructs and variables in each context. Assumptions of the agency theory and the transaction cost theory, originally addressed to private companies, were incorporated into creation of the model. Procedures for data collection included document analysis and 10 interviews. The suggested model includes the systematization of seven theoretical constructs — accountability, accessibility, independence, resources and structure; governance practices; institutional environment; performance — and variable components of these constructs. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/51580/50363 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 49 No. 4 (2015); 937 a 958 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 49 Núm. 4 (2015); 937 a 958 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 49 n. 4 (2015); 937 a 958 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943771972337664 |