Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454 |
Resumo: | Social justice is a controversial topic and one that fosters a wide-ranging debate within the milieu of the social sciences. Its ambiguous nature is mainly due to the existence of a number of different ways of approaching the subject. Some see it as being derived from an institutional procedure that is bound to formal justice with a material foundation, while others see it as deriving from individual behavior bound to ethics and morality. From this perspective, the topic demands a number of questions. When one talks of social justice, what precisely are the questions involved? What are its constituent elements? At what point can one state that a person or institution is just or unjust, fair or unfair? In other words, when is an individual aware or able to state categorically that the events of his/her daily life do indeed reflect a fair social system? These and other questions are of the utmost importance when one moves ahead in the debate regarding the management and implementation of public policies aimed at achieving a high level of social justice. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the enrichment of this debate by including elements considered important to the advancement of public policies in societies like that of Brazil. |
id |
FGV-4_f788ce61795a4e3b6ada7ad73c265fe9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62454 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalitiesEnfrentamientos con la idea de justicia social en relación a los conflictos sociales y las desigualdadesEmbates acerca da ideia de justiça social em relação a conflitos sociais e desigualdadessocial justicerecognitionredistributionparticipatory parity.justicia socialreconocimientoredistribuciónparidad participativa.justiça socialreconhecimentoredistribuiçãoparidade participativa.Social justice is a controversial topic and one that fosters a wide-ranging debate within the milieu of the social sciences. Its ambiguous nature is mainly due to the existence of a number of different ways of approaching the subject. Some see it as being derived from an institutional procedure that is bound to formal justice with a material foundation, while others see it as deriving from individual behavior bound to ethics and morality. From this perspective, the topic demands a number of questions. When one talks of social justice, what precisely are the questions involved? What are its constituent elements? At what point can one state that a person or institution is just or unjust, fair or unfair? In other words, when is an individual aware or able to state categorically that the events of his/her daily life do indeed reflect a fair social system? These and other questions are of the utmost importance when one moves ahead in the debate regarding the management and implementation of public policies aimed at achieving a high level of social justice. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the enrichment of this debate by including elements considered important to the advancement of public policies in societies like that of Brazil.La justicia social es un tema polémico, de amplio debate dentro de las ciencias sociales. Su carácter inexactos tallos de diversos enfoques encontraron sobre el tema, que el diseño como derivados de un procedimiento institucional vinculado a la justicia formal y material de base, orar a concebir como provenientes de la conducta individual ligado a la ética y la moral. En esta perspectiva, el tema exige un conjunto de preguntas. ¿Cuando se habla de justicia social, que, exactamente, están involucrados? ¿Que forman los elementos? ¿Cuando se puede decir que una persona o institución es justa o injusta? ¿En otras palabras, cuando usted sabe o no puede decir que ocurrencias cotidianas reflejan acuerdos sociales justos? Estas y otras preguntas son de la máxima importancia cuando se desenvuelve en el debate sobre la gestión y ejecución de políticas públicas que tienen el objetivo de alcanzar un alto nivel de justicia social. El propósito de este artículo es contribuir al enriquecimiento de este debate, incluyendo elementos que consideramos importantes para el avance de las políticas públicas en sociedades como la brasileña.A justiça social é um tema controverso, de amplo debate no âmbito das ciências sociais. Seu caráter impreciso decorre das diversas abordagens encontradas acerca do tema, que ora a concebem como derivada de um procedimento institucional vinculado à justiça formal e de base material, ora a concebem como procedente da conduta individual vinculada à ética e à moral. Nessa perspectiva, a temática demanda um conjunto de questionamentos. Quando se fala de justiça social, quais questões, exatamente, estão envolvidas? Quais elementos a constituem? Quando se pode dizer que uma pessoa ou instituição é justa ou injusta? Em outras palavras, quando se sabe ou se pode afirmar que as ocorrências cotidianas refletem arranjos sociais justos? Essas e outras indagações são de extrema relevância quando se evolui no debate acerca da gestão e da implementação de políticas públicas que têm por meta alcançar um patamar elevado de justiça social. O objetivo deste artigo é contribuir para o enriquecimento desse debate, incluindo elementos que consideramos importantes para o avanço das políticas públicas em sociedades como a brasileira.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2016-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 3 (2016); 355-375Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 3 (2016); 355-375Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 3 (2016); 355-3751982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454/60570Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPizzio, Alex2016-06-30T13:48:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62454Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2016-06-30T13:48:35Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities Enfrentamientos con la idea de justicia social en relación a los conflictos sociales y las desigualdades Embates acerca da ideia de justiça social em relação a conflitos sociais e desigualdades |
title |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
spellingShingle |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities Pizzio, Alex social justice recognition redistribution participatory parity. justicia social reconocimiento redistribución paridad participativa. justiça social reconhecimento redistribuição paridade participativa. |
title_short |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
title_full |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
title_fullStr |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
title_sort |
Clashes over the idea of social justice in relation to social conflicts and inequalities |
author |
Pizzio, Alex |
author_facet |
Pizzio, Alex |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pizzio, Alex |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
social justice recognition redistribution participatory parity. justicia social reconocimiento redistribución paridad participativa. justiça social reconhecimento redistribuição paridade participativa. |
topic |
social justice recognition redistribution participatory parity. justicia social reconocimiento redistribución paridad participativa. justiça social reconhecimento redistribuição paridade participativa. |
description |
Social justice is a controversial topic and one that fosters a wide-ranging debate within the milieu of the social sciences. Its ambiguous nature is mainly due to the existence of a number of different ways of approaching the subject. Some see it as being derived from an institutional procedure that is bound to formal justice with a material foundation, while others see it as deriving from individual behavior bound to ethics and morality. From this perspective, the topic demands a number of questions. When one talks of social justice, what precisely are the questions involved? What are its constituent elements? At what point can one state that a person or institution is just or unjust, fair or unfair? In other words, when is an individual aware or able to state categorically that the events of his/her daily life do indeed reflect a fair social system? These and other questions are of the utmost importance when one moves ahead in the debate regarding the management and implementation of public policies aimed at achieving a high level of social justice. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the enrichment of this debate by including elements considered important to the advancement of public policies in societies like that of Brazil. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/62454/60570 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 3 (2016); 355-375 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 3 (2016); 355-375 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 3 (2016); 355-375 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943772384428032 |