Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração de Empresas |
Texto Completo: | https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350 |
Resumo: | Despite the still present hegemony of the structural-functionalist orthodoxy, the mid 1980’s witnesses the insurgence of new philosophical approaches. This body of work had become a vital intellectual and ideological resource for those who wanted to confront the functionalist dominance in organization studies, such as structuration theory, labourprocess theory and neoinstitutionalist theory. The purpose of this paper is to review the incorporation of Bourdieu’s work into neoinstitutionalism. I argue that this appropriation has resulted in a significant loss of theoretical strength. By giving place to the cognitivist metaphors of mental models, “scripts” and “schemas”, instead of adopting thenotion of habitus, neoinstitutionalism reinforces some of the ever-present dichotomies in social sciences, especially those of agency/structure and individual/society. While neoinstitutionalism was refining the cognitive approach in the 1990’s, Bourdieu was moving towards psychoanalysis. Some indications for future research are provided in the concluding notes. |
id |
FGV-7_dbbb49195c8917d10f49891f39b3f2fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/36350 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessmentNeoinstitucionalismo e a apropriação da obra de Bourdieu: uma análise críticaNeoinstitutionalismBourdieucritiquesociologypsychoanalysisNeoinstitucionalismoBourdieucríticasociologiapsicanáliseDespite the still present hegemony of the structural-functionalist orthodoxy, the mid 1980’s witnesses the insurgence of new philosophical approaches. This body of work had become a vital intellectual and ideological resource for those who wanted to confront the functionalist dominance in organization studies, such as structuration theory, labourprocess theory and neoinstitutionalist theory. The purpose of this paper is to review the incorporation of Bourdieu’s work into neoinstitutionalism. I argue that this appropriation has resulted in a significant loss of theoretical strength. By giving place to the cognitivist metaphors of mental models, “scripts” and “schemas”, instead of adopting thenotion of habitus, neoinstitutionalism reinforces some of the ever-present dichotomies in social sciences, especially those of agency/structure and individual/society. While neoinstitutionalism was refining the cognitive approach in the 1990’s, Bourdieu was moving towards psychoanalysis. Some indications for future research are provided in the concluding notes.Apesar da presença ainda hegemônica da ortodoxia estrutural-funcionalista, em meados dos anos 1980 surgem novas perspectivas filosóficas. Esse corpo teórico tornou-se um recurso intelectual e ideológico vital para aqueles que desejavam confrontar a dominância funcionalista nos estudos organizacionais, tais como a teoria da estruturação, teoria do processo de trabalho e a teoria neoinstitucional. O objetivo deste artigo é revisar a incorporação da obra de Bourdieu no neoinstitucionalismo. Argumento que essa apropriação resultou numa perda significativa de potencial teórico. Ao dar espaço para as metáforas cognitivistas dos modelos mentais, “scripts” e “schemas”, ao invés de adotar a noção de habitus, o neoinstitucionalismo reforça algumas das eternas dicotomias das ciências sociais, especialmente as de agência/estrutura e indivíduo/sociedade. Enquanto o neoinstitucionalismo estava refinando a abordagem cognitivista nos anos 1990, Bourdieu movimentava-se em direção à psicanálise. Algumas indicações para pesquisas futuras são fornecidas nas notas de conclusão.RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de EmpresasRAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas2009-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 49 No. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-336RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 49 Núm. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-336RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 49 n. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-3362178-938X0034-7590reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresasinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350/35127Mangi, Luis Claudioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-08-17T18:38:29Zoai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/36350Revistahttps://rae.fgv.br/raeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br2178-938X0034-7590opendoar:2016-08-17T18:38:29Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment Neoinstitucionalismo e a apropriação da obra de Bourdieu: uma análise crítica |
title |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
spellingShingle |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment Mangi, Luis Claudio Neoinstitutionalism Bourdieu critique sociology psychoanalysis Neoinstitucionalismo Bourdieu crítica sociologia psicanálise |
title_short |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
title_full |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
title_fullStr |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
title_sort |
Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: a critical assessment |
author |
Mangi, Luis Claudio |
author_facet |
Mangi, Luis Claudio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mangi, Luis Claudio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neoinstitutionalism Bourdieu critique sociology psychoanalysis Neoinstitucionalismo Bourdieu crítica sociologia psicanálise |
topic |
Neoinstitutionalism Bourdieu critique sociology psychoanalysis Neoinstitucionalismo Bourdieu crítica sociologia psicanálise |
description |
Despite the still present hegemony of the structural-functionalist orthodoxy, the mid 1980’s witnesses the insurgence of new philosophical approaches. This body of work had become a vital intellectual and ideological resource for those who wanted to confront the functionalist dominance in organization studies, such as structuration theory, labourprocess theory and neoinstitutionalist theory. The purpose of this paper is to review the incorporation of Bourdieu’s work into neoinstitutionalism. I argue that this appropriation has resulted in a significant loss of theoretical strength. By giving place to the cognitivist metaphors of mental models, “scripts” and “schemas”, instead of adopting thenotion of habitus, neoinstitutionalism reinforces some of the ever-present dichotomies in social sciences, especially those of agency/structure and individual/society. While neoinstitutionalism was refining the cognitive approach in the 1990’s, Bourdieu was moving towards psychoanalysis. Some indications for future research are provided in the concluding notes. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/36350/35127 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 49 No. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-336 RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 49 Núm. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-336 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 49 n. 3 (2009): julho-setembro; 323-336 2178-938X 0034-7590 reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresas instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
collection |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1766160819323666432 |