Science and society

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tonelli, Maria José
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Zambaldi, Felipe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração de Empresas
Texto Completo: https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315
Resumo: During these dystopian times in which we are living, it is worth remembering the questions proposed by Rousseau in the eighteenth century: Will science destroy our habits? Will it maintain our virtues? Has science been useful in reducing inequalities? Santos (2008) affirms that we have reached a moment of rupture in the scientific order which asserted its hegemonic rule over scientific development in the last centuries. He believes that the twentyfirstcentury will not distinguish between the natural and human sciences, and that the social sciences will free themselves from positivism, since this is, in effect, “also a totalitarian model” (Santos, 2008, p.11). In this model, the author continues, “to know means to quantify” (Santos, 2008, p.15), but this implies a reduction in complexity, in a mechanistic determinism that does not contemplate the contemporary view that “all natural scientific knowledge issocial scientific knowledge” (Santos, 2008, p. 37).
id FGV-7_fd4865b7fc77ce53598c56752f1f529d
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75315
network_acronym_str FGV-7
network_name_str Revista de Administração de Empresas
repository_id_str
spelling Science and societyCiencia y sociedadCiência e sociedadeDuring these dystopian times in which we are living, it is worth remembering the questions proposed by Rousseau in the eighteenth century: Will science destroy our habits? Will it maintain our virtues? Has science been useful in reducing inequalities? Santos (2008) affirms that we have reached a moment of rupture in the scientific order which asserted its hegemonic rule over scientific development in the last centuries. He believes that the twentyfirstcentury will not distinguish between the natural and human sciences, and that the social sciences will free themselves from positivism, since this is, in effect, “also a totalitarian model” (Santos, 2008, p.11). In this model, the author continues, “to know means to quantify” (Santos, 2008, p.15), but this implies a reduction in complexity, in a mechanistic determinism that does not contemplate the contemporary view that “all natural scientific knowledge issocial scientific knowledge” (Santos, 2008, p. 37).During these dystopian times in which we are living, it is worth remembering the questions proposed by Rousseau in the eighteenth century: Will science destroy our habits? Will it maintain our virtues? Has science been useful in reducing inequalities? Santos (2008) affirms that we have reached a moment of rupture in the scientific order which asserted its hegemonic rule over scientific development in the last centuries. He believes that the twentyfirstcentury will not distinguish between the natural and human sciences, and that the social sciences will free themselves from positivism, since this is, in effect, “also a totalitarian model” (Santos, 2008, p.11). In this model, the author continues, “to know means to quantify” (Santos, 2008, p.15), but this implies a reduction in complexity, in a mechanistic determinism that does not contemplate the contemporary view that “all natural scientific knowledge issocial scientific knowledge” (Santos, 2008, p. 37).Nesse momento de distopia que vivemos, não custa lembrar das questões feitas por Rousseau no século XVIII: a ciência servirá para destruir nossos costumes? Manter nossas virtudes? A ciência tem sido útil para diminuir as desigualdades? Santos (1987) afirma que estamos num momento de ruptura da ordem científica que hegemonicamente regeu o desenvolvimento científico nos últimos séculos. O século XXI, diz Santos, não fará mais distinção entre ciências naturais e ciências humanas e as ciências sociais vão se libertar do positivismo, uma vez que esse modelo em vigência “é também um modelo totalitário” (Santos, 1987, p. 11).RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de EmpresasRAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/7531510.1590/S0034-759020180401RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 347RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 347RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 3472178-938X0034-7590reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresasinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315/73500https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315/73501Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTonelli, Maria JoséZambaldi, Felipe2019-01-22T18:33:03Zoai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75315Revistahttps://rae.fgv.br/raeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br2178-938X0034-7590opendoar:2019-01-22T18:33:03Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Science and society
Ciencia y sociedad
Ciência e sociedade
title Science and society
spellingShingle Science and society
Tonelli, Maria José
title_short Science and society
title_full Science and society
title_fullStr Science and society
title_full_unstemmed Science and society
title_sort Science and society
author Tonelli, Maria José
author_facet Tonelli, Maria José
Zambaldi, Felipe
author_role author
author2 Zambaldi, Felipe
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tonelli, Maria José
Zambaldi, Felipe
description During these dystopian times in which we are living, it is worth remembering the questions proposed by Rousseau in the eighteenth century: Will science destroy our habits? Will it maintain our virtues? Has science been useful in reducing inequalities? Santos (2008) affirms that we have reached a moment of rupture in the scientific order which asserted its hegemonic rule over scientific development in the last centuries. He believes that the twentyfirstcentury will not distinguish between the natural and human sciences, and that the social sciences will free themselves from positivism, since this is, in effect, “also a totalitarian model” (Santos, 2008, p.11). In this model, the author continues, “to know means to quantify” (Santos, 2008, p.15), but this implies a reduction in complexity, in a mechanistic determinism that does not contemplate the contemporary view that “all natural scientific knowledge issocial scientific knowledge” (Santos, 2008, p. 37).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315
10.1590/S0034-759020180401
url https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-759020180401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315/73500
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75315/73501
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 347
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 347
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 347
2178-938X
0034-7590
reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresas
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração de Empresas
collection Revista de Administração de Empresas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br
_version_ 1766160830185865216