A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942 |
Resumo: | Looking closely at the PPP argument, it states that the currencies purchasing power should not change when comparing the same basket goods across countries, and these goods should all be tradable. Hence, if PPP is valid at all, it should be captured by the relative price indices that best fits these two features. We ran a horse race among six different price indices available from the IMF database to see which one would yield higher PPP evidence, and, therefore, better fit the two features. We used RER proxies measured as the ratio of export unit values, wholesale prices, value added deflators, unit labor costs, normalized unit labor costs and consumer prices, for a sample of 16 industrial countries, with quarterly data from 1975 to 2002. PPP was tested using both the ADF and the DF-GLS unit root test of the RER series. The RER measured as WPI ratios was the one for which PPP evidence was found for the larger number of countries: six out of sixteen when we use DF-GLS test with demeaned series. The worst measure of all was the RER based on the ratio of foreign CPIs and domestic WPI. No evidence of PPP at all was found for this measure. |
id |
FGV-8_86da7c5e3b4cd676a7c9cf4a4881ee03 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/942 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-8 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price IndexLooking closely at the PPP argument, it states that the currencies purchasing power should not change when comparing the same basket goods across countries, and these goods should all be tradable. Hence, if PPP is valid at all, it should be captured by the relative price indices that best fits these two features. We ran a horse race among six different price indices available from the IMF database to see which one would yield higher PPP evidence, and, therefore, better fit the two features. We used RER proxies measured as the ratio of export unit values, wholesale prices, value added deflators, unit labor costs, normalized unit labor costs and consumer prices, for a sample of 16 industrial countries, with quarterly data from 1975 to 2002. PPP was tested using both the ADF and the DF-GLS unit root test of the RER series. The RER measured as WPI ratios was the one for which PPP evidence was found for the larger number of countries: six out of sixteen when we use DF-GLS test with demeaned series. The worst measure of all was the RER based on the ratio of foreign CPIs and domestic WPI. No evidence of PPP at all was found for this measure.EGV EPGE2008-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942Revista Brasileira de Economia; Vol. 62 No. 1 (2008); 95-102Revista Brasileira de Economia; v. 62 n. 1 (2008); 95-1021806-91340034-7140reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVengporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942/392https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942/471Terra, CristinaVahia, Ana Luciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2008-10-20T16:57:33Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/942Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/oai||rbe@fgv.br1806-91340034-7140opendoar:2024-03-06T13:02:56.615255Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
title |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
spellingShingle |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index Terra, Cristina |
title_short |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
title_full |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
title_fullStr |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
title_full_unstemmed |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
title_sort |
A note Purchasing Power Parity and The Choice of Price Index |
author |
Terra, Cristina |
author_facet |
Terra, Cristina Vahia, Ana Lucia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vahia, Ana Lucia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Terra, Cristina Vahia, Ana Lucia |
description |
Looking closely at the PPP argument, it states that the currencies purchasing power should not change when comparing the same basket goods across countries, and these goods should all be tradable. Hence, if PPP is valid at all, it should be captured by the relative price indices that best fits these two features. We ran a horse race among six different price indices available from the IMF database to see which one would yield higher PPP evidence, and, therefore, better fit the two features. We used RER proxies measured as the ratio of export unit values, wholesale prices, value added deflators, unit labor costs, normalized unit labor costs and consumer prices, for a sample of 16 industrial countries, with quarterly data from 1975 to 2002. PPP was tested using both the ADF and the DF-GLS unit root test of the RER series. The RER measured as WPI ratios was the one for which PPP evidence was found for the larger number of countries: six out of sixteen when we use DF-GLS test with demeaned series. The worst measure of all was the RER based on the ratio of foreign CPIs and domestic WPI. No evidence of PPP at all was found for this measure. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-09-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942/392 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rbe/article/view/942/471 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EGV EPGE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EGV EPGE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Economia; Vol. 62 No. 1 (2008); 95-102 Revista Brasileira de Economia; v. 62 n. 1 (2008); 95-102 1806-9134 0034-7140 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbe@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943112349876224 |