The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aldrighi,Dante Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2003
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402003000300001
Resumo: This paper aims at evaluating the mechanisms of corporate governance currently at work in the United States. Section 1 turns its focus to the reasons accounting for the still relative scarceness of large shareholders in American publicly held companies. The analysis thereafter concentrates on assessing the efficacy of each of the pillars purportedly buttressing the American system of corporate control. The paper argues that the evidence provided by the existing corporate governance literature supports the following propositions: 1) the legal and regulatory framework actually restrains the scope for expropriating minority shareholders, though at the cost of inhibiting institutional investor activism; 2) as a rule, the board of directors do not comply with their mandatory duty of overseeing management, although some progress has recently been made, with directors in several companies becoming less submissive to chief executive officers; 3) the market for corporate control encounters a great number of difficulties (ranging from legal hurdles to high transaction costs and to serious free-riding problems), which are sufficient to cast a cloud on its reliability as a means of repressing managerial inefficiencies and rent-seeking; 4) competition in the product and capital markets is likely to produce effects only in the long-run.
id FGV-8_bcd5cfa1b6b2b3f32be6e22dcbe26218
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71402003000300001
network_acronym_str FGV-8
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessmentcorporate governanceUnited Statesboard of directorsproxy contestshostile takeoversthe market for corporate controltender offersincomplete contractsThis paper aims at evaluating the mechanisms of corporate governance currently at work in the United States. Section 1 turns its focus to the reasons accounting for the still relative scarceness of large shareholders in American publicly held companies. The analysis thereafter concentrates on assessing the efficacy of each of the pillars purportedly buttressing the American system of corporate control. The paper argues that the evidence provided by the existing corporate governance literature supports the following propositions: 1) the legal and regulatory framework actually restrains the scope for expropriating minority shareholders, though at the cost of inhibiting institutional investor activism; 2) as a rule, the board of directors do not comply with their mandatory duty of overseeing management, although some progress has recently been made, with directors in several companies becoming less submissive to chief executive officers; 3) the market for corporate control encounters a great number of difficulties (ranging from legal hurdles to high transaction costs and to serious free-riding problems), which are sufficient to cast a cloud on its reliability as a means of repressing managerial inefficiencies and rent-seeking; 4) competition in the product and capital markets is likely to produce effects only in the long-run.Fundação Getúlio Vargas2003-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402003000300001Revista Brasileira de Economia v.57 n.3 2003reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/S0034-71402003000300001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAldrighi,Dante Mendeseng2004-03-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71402003000300001Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbe/issue/archivehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbe@fgv.br1806-91340034-7140opendoar:2004-03-19T00:00Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
title The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
spellingShingle The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
Aldrighi,Dante Mendes
corporate governance
United States
board of directors
proxy contests
hostile takeovers
the market for corporate control
tender offers
incomplete contracts
title_short The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
title_full The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
title_fullStr The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
title_full_unstemmed The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
title_sort The mechanisms of corporate governance in the United States: an assessment
author Aldrighi,Dante Mendes
author_facet Aldrighi,Dante Mendes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aldrighi,Dante Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv corporate governance
United States
board of directors
proxy contests
hostile takeovers
the market for corporate control
tender offers
incomplete contracts
topic corporate governance
United States
board of directors
proxy contests
hostile takeovers
the market for corporate control
tender offers
incomplete contracts
description This paper aims at evaluating the mechanisms of corporate governance currently at work in the United States. Section 1 turns its focus to the reasons accounting for the still relative scarceness of large shareholders in American publicly held companies. The analysis thereafter concentrates on assessing the efficacy of each of the pillars purportedly buttressing the American system of corporate control. The paper argues that the evidence provided by the existing corporate governance literature supports the following propositions: 1) the legal and regulatory framework actually restrains the scope for expropriating minority shareholders, though at the cost of inhibiting institutional investor activism; 2) as a rule, the board of directors do not comply with their mandatory duty of overseeing management, although some progress has recently been made, with directors in several companies becoming less submissive to chief executive officers; 3) the market for corporate control encounters a great number of difficulties (ranging from legal hurdles to high transaction costs and to serious free-riding problems), which are sufficient to cast a cloud on its reliability as a means of repressing managerial inefficiencies and rent-seeking; 4) competition in the product and capital markets is likely to produce effects only in the long-run.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402003000300001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402003000300001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-71402003000300001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getúlio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getúlio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Economia v.57 n.3 2003
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Economia (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbe@fgv.br
_version_ 1754115904480739328