The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corcetti, Elisabete
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208
Resumo: The aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization.
id FGV-9_17148ee3fcded7963e58d3083e90ce5a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62208
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?El discurso político acerca de la cualificación profesional de mujeres desfavorecidas: ¿Emancipación o hegemonía?O discurso político sobre a qualificação profissional de mulheres desfavorecidas: emancipação ou hegemonia?Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysisPolítica públicaConstrucción socialGéneroAnálisis crítico del discursoPolítica públicaConstrução socialGêneroAnálise de discurso críticaThe aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization.El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las lógicas, las suposiciones y las creencias presentes en el contexto del Programa Mujeres Mil, para verificar su contribución a la construcción social de los roles profesionales asignados a las mujeres desfavorecidas. Para ello, se analizó el proyecto del Programa Mujeres Mil, desarrollado por los creadores del programa, en 2006. La investigación, de carácter cualitativo, se basó en la propuesta transdisciplinaria, que dialoga con los principios epistemológicos de los estudios discursivos críticos de Fairclough, Chouliaraki y Fairclough, en conjunción con la teoría de la construcción social de poblaciones objetivo y con referencias de estudios feministas. Los resultados mostraron que el discurso político y los elementos del policy design del Programa Mujeres Mil, guiados por construcciones sociales y culturas institucionales, promueven cualificaciones en áreas tradicionalmente femeninas, con una limitada emancipación de las mujeres. Se concluye que existe una contradicción entre el discurso del programa y su práctica concreta, ya que reproduce la lógica que mantiene la hegemonía y la polarización de género.O objetivo do artigo é analisar as lógicas, os pressupostos e as crenças presentes no contexto do Programa Mulheres Mil, verificando sua contribuição para a construção social dos papéis profissionais atribuídos às mulheres desfavorecidas. Para tanto, foi analisado o projeto do Programa Mulheres Mil, desenvolvido pelos idealizadores do programa, em 2006. A pesquisa, de natureza qualitativa, baseou-se na proposta transdisciplinar, que dialoga com os princípios epistemológicos dos estudos discursivos críticos de Fairclough, Chouliaraki e Fairclough, conjugados com a teoria da construção social de populações-alvo e com referenciais dos estudos feministas. Os resultados evidenciaram que o discurso político e os elementos do policy design do Programa Mulheres Mil, pautados em construções sociais e culturas institucionais, promovem qualificações em áreas tradicionalmente femininas, com limitada emancipação das mulheres. Conclui-se que há uma contradição entre o discurso do programa e sua prática concreta, pois se reitera a lógica que mantém a hegemonia e a polarização de gênero.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017); 364-376Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2017); 364-376Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 2 (2017); 364-3761679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66329https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66333Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorcetti, ElisabeteLoreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de2017-06-28T13:42:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62208Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:01.758541Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
El discurso político acerca de la cualificación profesional de mujeres desfavorecidas: ¿Emancipación o hegemonía?
O discurso político sobre a qualificação profissional de mulheres desfavorecidas: emancipação ou hegemonia?
title The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
spellingShingle The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
Corcetti, Elisabete
Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis
Política pública
Construcción social
Género
Análisis crítico del discurso
Política pública
Construção social
Gênero
Análise de discurso crítica
title_short The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
title_full The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
title_fullStr The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
title_full_unstemmed The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
title_sort The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
author Corcetti, Elisabete
author_facet Corcetti, Elisabete
Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de
author_role author
author2 Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corcetti, Elisabete
Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis
Política pública
Construcción social
Género
Análisis crítico del discurso
Política pública
Construção social
Gênero
Análise de discurso crítica
topic Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis
Política pública
Construcción social
Género
Análisis crítico del discurso
Política pública
Construção social
Gênero
Análise de discurso crítica
description The aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66329
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66333
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017); 364-376
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2017); 364-376
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 2 (2017); 364-376
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210991517696