The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization. |
id |
FGV-9_17148ee3fcded7963e58d3083e90ce5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62208 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony?El discurso político acerca de la cualificación profesional de mujeres desfavorecidas: ¿Emancipación o hegemonía?O discurso político sobre a qualificação profissional de mulheres desfavorecidas: emancipação ou hegemonia?Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysisPolítica públicaConstrucción socialGéneroAnálisis crítico del discursoPolítica públicaConstrução socialGêneroAnálise de discurso críticaThe aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization.El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las lógicas, las suposiciones y las creencias presentes en el contexto del Programa Mujeres Mil, para verificar su contribución a la construcción social de los roles profesionales asignados a las mujeres desfavorecidas. Para ello, se analizó el proyecto del Programa Mujeres Mil, desarrollado por los creadores del programa, en 2006. La investigación, de carácter cualitativo, se basó en la propuesta transdisciplinaria, que dialoga con los principios epistemológicos de los estudios discursivos críticos de Fairclough, Chouliaraki y Fairclough, en conjunción con la teoría de la construcción social de poblaciones objetivo y con referencias de estudios feministas. Los resultados mostraron que el discurso político y los elementos del policy design del Programa Mujeres Mil, guiados por construcciones sociales y culturas institucionales, promueven cualificaciones en áreas tradicionalmente femeninas, con una limitada emancipación de las mujeres. Se concluye que existe una contradicción entre el discurso del programa y su práctica concreta, ya que reproduce la lógica que mantiene la hegemonía y la polarización de género.O objetivo do artigo é analisar as lógicas, os pressupostos e as crenças presentes no contexto do Programa Mulheres Mil, verificando sua contribuição para a construção social dos papéis profissionais atribuídos às mulheres desfavorecidas. Para tanto, foi analisado o projeto do Programa Mulheres Mil, desenvolvido pelos idealizadores do programa, em 2006. A pesquisa, de natureza qualitativa, baseou-se na proposta transdisciplinar, que dialoga com os princípios epistemológicos dos estudos discursivos críticos de Fairclough, Chouliaraki e Fairclough, conjugados com a teoria da construção social de populações-alvo e com referenciais dos estudos feministas. Os resultados evidenciaram que o discurso político e os elementos do policy design do Programa Mulheres Mil, pautados em construções sociais e culturas institucionais, promovem qualificações em áreas tradicionalmente femininas, com limitada emancipação das mulheres. Conclui-se que há uma contradição entre o discurso do programa e sua prática concreta, pois se reitera a lógica que mantém a hegemonia e a polarização de gênero.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017); 364-376Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2017); 364-376Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 2 (2017); 364-3761679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66329https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66333Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorcetti, ElisabeteLoreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de2017-06-28T13:42:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/62208Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:01.758541Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? El discurso político acerca de la cualificación profesional de mujeres desfavorecidas: ¿Emancipación o hegemonía? O discurso político sobre a qualificação profissional de mulheres desfavorecidas: emancipação ou hegemonia? |
title |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
spellingShingle |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? Corcetti, Elisabete Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis Política pública Construcción social Género Análisis crítico del discurso Política pública Construção social Gênero Análise de discurso crítica |
title_short |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
title_full |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
title_fullStr |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
title_sort |
The political discourse on the professional qualification of disadvantaged women: emancipation or hegemony? |
author |
Corcetti, Elisabete |
author_facet |
Corcetti, Elisabete Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corcetti, Elisabete Loreto, Maria das Dores Saraiva de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis Política pública Construcción social Género Análisis crítico del discurso Política pública Construção social Gênero Análise de discurso crítica |
topic |
Public Policy. Social construction. Gender. Critical discourse analysis Política pública Construcción social Género Análisis crítico del discurso Política pública Construção social Gênero Análise de discurso crítica |
description |
The aim of this article is to analyze the logic, assumptions and beliefs present in the context of the Thousand Women Program created in 2006. The article verifies the program’s contribution to the social construction of the professional roles attributed to disadvantaged women. The qualitative research was based on the transdisciplinary approach, which refers to the epistemological principles of critical discourse studies of Fairclough, Chouliaraki and Fairclough, together with the theory of social construction of target populations and with references to feminist studies. The results showed that the political discourse and policy design elements of the Thousand Women Program, based on social constructs and institutional cultures, promote skills in traditionally female areas with limited emancipation of women. The conclusion shows that there is a contradiction between the program’s discourse and its actual practice, because it reiterates the logic that maintains hegemony and gender polarization. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66329 https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/62208/66333 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017); 364-376 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2017); 364-376 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 2 (2017); 364-376 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210991517696 |