Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512022000200164 |
Resumo: | Abstract Considering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding - enlightenment and emancipation of man - do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration. |
id |
FGV-9_198125b1168ebbc412c3fc79049e030f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-39512022000200164 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administrationCommunicative actionCommunicative rationalityHabermasPublic AdministrationSocial participationAbstract Considering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding - enlightenment and emancipation of man - do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration.Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512022000200164Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.20 n.2 2022reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/1679-395120210013xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAthayde,ANDRÉ LUIZ MENDESALVES,LUÍS FERNANDO DE SOUZAPAULA,PABLO PERÓN DEGOMES,ADALMIR DE OLIVEIRAeng2022-05-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-39512022000200164Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cadernosebape/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2022-05-11T00:00Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
title |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
spellingShingle |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration Athayde,ANDRÉ LUIZ MENDES Communicative action Communicative rationality Habermas Public Administration Social participation |
title_short |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
title_full |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
title_fullStr |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
title_sort |
Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration |
author |
Athayde,ANDRÉ LUIZ MENDES |
author_facet |
Athayde,ANDRÉ LUIZ MENDES ALVES,LUÍS FERNANDO DE SOUZA PAULA,PABLO PERÓN DE GOMES,ADALMIR DE OLIVEIRA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ALVES,LUÍS FERNANDO DE SOUZA PAULA,PABLO PERÓN DE GOMES,ADALMIR DE OLIVEIRA |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Athayde,ANDRÉ LUIZ MENDES ALVES,LUÍS FERNANDO DE SOUZA PAULA,PABLO PERÓN DE GOMES,ADALMIR DE OLIVEIRA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Communicative action Communicative rationality Habermas Public Administration Social participation |
topic |
Communicative action Communicative rationality Habermas Public Administration Social participation |
description |
Abstract Considering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding - enlightenment and emancipation of man - do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512022000200164 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512022000200164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1679-395120210013x |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.20 n.2 2022 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1754115887180283904 |