The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Eloisio Moulin de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da, Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624
Resumo: This article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively.
id FGV-9_4d2a6b8ac60e5ec8be2f4ccf9ae460af
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/18624
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidenceA Organização (in)corporada: ontologia organizacional, poder e corpo em evidênciaOntology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. PowerOntologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. PoderThis article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively.Este artigo tem por objetivo problematizar o significado de organização por meio de uma abordagem construcionista. Para tanto, foi realizado um estudo bibliográfico sobre o tema, cujo principal objetivo é analisar as diferenças entre os debates realista e construcionista sobre a ontologia organizacional. Verifica-se que o conceito de organização se torna bem mais amplo nas abordagens construcionistas, não se limitando ao estudo de temas relacionados exclusivamente a empresas, trabalho ou indústrias. Nesse sentido, para problematizar os principais aspectos construcionistas relacionados ao conceito de organização, considera-se o estudo do corpo um dos temas pertencentes aos estudos organizacionais, correlacionando esse tema aos processos de organizing, processos estes constituídos por relações de poder que perpassam todo o corpo social, ou seja, que ocorrem além das fronteiras de uma empresa. Dessa forma, o objeto de análise dos estudos organizacionais passa a ser o organizing e não as organizações. Para entender como esses processos de organizing ocorrem, é necessário considerar que objetos, sentidos, significados, “realidades” e “verdades” são socialmente construídos e não existem a priori ou pré-discursivamente.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2015); 727 a 742Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2015); 727 a 742Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 4 (2015); 727 a 7421679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624/55521Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Eloisio Moulin deCosta, Alessandra de Sá Mello daPereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes2016-10-10T17:38:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/18624Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:52.288027Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
A Organização (in)corporada: ontologia organizacional, poder e corpo em evidência
title The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
spellingShingle The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
Souza, Eloisio Moulin de
Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power
Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder
title_short The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
title_full The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
title_fullStr The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
title_full_unstemmed The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
title_sort The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
author Souza, Eloisio Moulin de
author_facet Souza, Eloisio Moulin de
Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da
Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes
author_role author
author2 Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da
Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Eloisio Moulin de
Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da
Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power
Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder
topic Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power
Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder
description This article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624/55521
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2015); 727 a 742
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2015); 727 a 742
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 4 (2015); 727 a 742
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210051993600