The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624 |
Resumo: | This article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively. |
id |
FGV-9_4d2a6b8ac60e5ec8be2f4ccf9ae460af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/18624 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidenceA Organização (in)corporada: ontologia organizacional, poder e corpo em evidênciaOntology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. PowerOntologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. PoderThis article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively.Este artigo tem por objetivo problematizar o significado de organização por meio de uma abordagem construcionista. Para tanto, foi realizado um estudo bibliográfico sobre o tema, cujo principal objetivo é analisar as diferenças entre os debates realista e construcionista sobre a ontologia organizacional. Verifica-se que o conceito de organização se torna bem mais amplo nas abordagens construcionistas, não se limitando ao estudo de temas relacionados exclusivamente a empresas, trabalho ou indústrias. Nesse sentido, para problematizar os principais aspectos construcionistas relacionados ao conceito de organização, considera-se o estudo do corpo um dos temas pertencentes aos estudos organizacionais, correlacionando esse tema aos processos de organizing, processos estes constituídos por relações de poder que perpassam todo o corpo social, ou seja, que ocorrem além das fronteiras de uma empresa. Dessa forma, o objeto de análise dos estudos organizacionais passa a ser o organizing e não as organizações. Para entender como esses processos de organizing ocorrem, é necessário considerar que objetos, sentidos, significados, “realidades” e “verdades” são socialmente construídos e não existem a priori ou pré-discursivamente.Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2015-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2015); 727 a 742Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2015); 727 a 742Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 4 (2015); 727 a 7421679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624/55521Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Eloisio Moulin deCosta, Alessandra de Sá Mello daPereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes2016-10-10T17:38:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/18624Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapePRIhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2016-10-10T17:38:48Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence A Organização (in)corporada: ontologia organizacional, poder e corpo em evidência |
title |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
spellingShingle |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence Souza, Eloisio Moulin de Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder |
title_short |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
title_full |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
title_fullStr |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
title_sort |
The (in)corporated organization: organizational ontology, power, and body in evidence |
author |
Souza, Eloisio Moulin de |
author_facet |
Souza, Eloisio Moulin de Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Eloisio Moulin de Costa, Alessandra de Sá Mello da Pereira, Severino Joaquim Nunes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder |
topic |
Ontology. Organizing. Body. Social constructionism. Power Ontologia. Organizing. Corpo. Construcionismo social. Poder |
description |
This article aims to discuss the meaning of organization through a constructionist approach. To do this, we conducted a bibliographic study on the theme, whose main aim is analyzing the differences between the realist and constructionist debates about organizational ontology. It is observed that the concept of organization becomes much broader in constructionist approaches, not limited to studying themes related only to companies, work, or industries. In this sense, to discuss the main constructionist aspects related to the concept of organization, the study on the body is regarded as one of the themes belonging to organizational studies, correlating this theme to organizing processes, which are constituted by power relations that permeate the whole social body, i.e. they occur beyond the boundaries of a company. Thus, the object of analysis of organizational studies becomes organizing, instead of organizations. To understand how these organizing processes occur, there is a need to consider that objects, senses, meanings, “realities” and “truths” are socially constructed and they do not exist a priori or pre-discursively. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/18624/55521 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2015); 727 a 742 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2015); 727 a 742 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 4 (2015); 727 a 742 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1819875607667802112 |