Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079 |
Resumo: | The scientific field of Social Management has a growing academic research that discusses alternative forms of management, characterized by dialogical management actions. This study aims to identify possible theoretical issues that arise in this field. In order to do it, it is conducted a citation analysis of the papers indexed in Google Scholar, from which four theoretical approaches are defined, which are explained by the theoretical foundations (Frankfurt’s critical approach and the interorganizational social management development), the origin of its researchers (“puquiana” approach) or by singularities (societal approach of public administration, which is identified from the particular characteristics of a model of public management emerged in Brazil, opposed to the neoliberal management movement of the 1980s). Moreover, the paper shows that among the approaches - at least in the papers with greater impact - common themes can be identified, as the opposition social management versus strategic management; the third sector as an area of occurrence of social management; the prominence of concepts such as participation, dialogue and the common good. Despite these convergences, the paper indicates that there is a basic conceptual subdivision into two parts: one, linking social management strictly to public management, setting it as societal public administration (PAES DE PAULA, 2005a; 2005b), management of social development (FISCHER, 2002) or social management (DOWBOR, 1999b) and another that expands its scope towards a dialogic management action that can (and should) be used in various social systems - whether public, private or non-governmental organizations (FRANÇA-FILHO, 2008; TENÓRIO, 2005). |
id |
FGV-9_726c0e4315d09dcd03bf9698572f9752 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/9079 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysisAproximaciones teóricas a la gestión social: un análisis de la cita exploratoriaAbordagens teóricas da Gestão Social: uma análise de citações exploratóriaThe scientific field of Social Management has a growing academic research that discusses alternative forms of management, characterized by dialogical management actions. This study aims to identify possible theoretical issues that arise in this field. In order to do it, it is conducted a citation analysis of the papers indexed in Google Scholar, from which four theoretical approaches are defined, which are explained by the theoretical foundations (Frankfurt’s critical approach and the interorganizational social management development), the origin of its researchers (“puquiana” approach) or by singularities (societal approach of public administration, which is identified from the particular characteristics of a model of public management emerged in Brazil, opposed to the neoliberal management movement of the 1980s). Moreover, the paper shows that among the approaches - at least in the papers with greater impact - common themes can be identified, as the opposition social management versus strategic management; the third sector as an area of occurrence of social management; the prominence of concepts such as participation, dialogue and the common good. Despite these convergences, the paper indicates that there is a basic conceptual subdivision into two parts: one, linking social management strictly to public management, setting it as societal public administration (PAES DE PAULA, 2005a; 2005b), management of social development (FISCHER, 2002) or social management (DOWBOR, 1999b) and another that expands its scope towards a dialogic management action that can (and should) be used in various social systems - whether public, private or non-governmental organizations (FRANÇA-FILHO, 2008; TENÓRIO, 2005).O campo científico da Gestão Social conta com uma crescente produção acadêmica por meio da qual se discutem formas alternativas de gestão e que são caracterizadas por ações gerenciais dialógicas. Neste trabalho, objetiva-se identificar possíveis vertentes teóricas que emergem nesse campo. Para isso, é feita uma análise de citações dos trabalhos indexados na base Google Acadêmico, por meio da qual são delimitadas quatro abordagens teóricas que se explicam pelas fundamentações teóricas (abordagens crítica frankfurteana e da gestão do desenvolvimento social interorganizacional); pela origem de seus pesquisadores (abordagem puquiana) ou pelas singularidades (abordagem da administração pública societal, identificada com base nas especificidades de um modelo de gestão pública surgida no Brasil, que se contrapõe ao movimento gerencialista neoliberal dos anos 1980). Aponta-se, ainda, no trabalho, que entre as abordagens – pelo menos nos trabalhos de maior impacto –, temas comuns podem ser identificados, como a contraposição gestão social versus gestão estratégica; o terceiro setor como um espaço de ocorrência da gestão social; a proeminência de conceitos como participação, diálogo e busca do bem comum. A despeito dessas convergências, indica-se no trabalho que há uma subdivisão conceitual básica em duas vertentes: uma vinculando a gestão social estritamente à gestão pública, configurando-a como administração pública societal (PAES DE PAULA, 2005a; 2005b), gestão do desenvolvimento social (FISCHER, 2002) ou gestão do social (DOWBOR, 1999b), e outra que expande seu escopo a uma ação gerencial dialógica que pode (e deve) ser utilizada em sistemas sociais diversos – sejam eles públicos, privados ou organizações não governamentais (FRANÇA-FILHO, 2008; TENÓRIO, 2005).Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2014-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2014); 221 a 236Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2014); 221 a 236Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 12 n. 2 (2014); 221 a 2361679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079/23797Peres Jr., Miguel RiveraPereira, José Robertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-10T17:37:38Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/9079Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:46.597569Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis Aproximaciones teóricas a la gestión social: un análisis de la cita exploratoria Abordagens teóricas da Gestão Social: uma análise de citações exploratória |
title |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
spellingShingle |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis Peres Jr., Miguel Rivera |
title_short |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
title_full |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
title_fullStr |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
title_sort |
Theoretical approaches of Social Management: an exploratory citation analysis |
author |
Peres Jr., Miguel Rivera |
author_facet |
Peres Jr., Miguel Rivera Pereira, José Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, José Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peres Jr., Miguel Rivera Pereira, José Roberto |
description |
The scientific field of Social Management has a growing academic research that discusses alternative forms of management, characterized by dialogical management actions. This study aims to identify possible theoretical issues that arise in this field. In order to do it, it is conducted a citation analysis of the papers indexed in Google Scholar, from which four theoretical approaches are defined, which are explained by the theoretical foundations (Frankfurt’s critical approach and the interorganizational social management development), the origin of its researchers (“puquiana” approach) or by singularities (societal approach of public administration, which is identified from the particular characteristics of a model of public management emerged in Brazil, opposed to the neoliberal management movement of the 1980s). Moreover, the paper shows that among the approaches - at least in the papers with greater impact - common themes can be identified, as the opposition social management versus strategic management; the third sector as an area of occurrence of social management; the prominence of concepts such as participation, dialogue and the common good. Despite these convergences, the paper indicates that there is a basic conceptual subdivision into two parts: one, linking social management strictly to public management, setting it as societal public administration (PAES DE PAULA, 2005a; 2005b), management of social development (FISCHER, 2002) or social management (DOWBOR, 1999b) and another that expands its scope towards a dialogic management action that can (and should) be used in various social systems - whether public, private or non-governmental organizations (FRANÇA-FILHO, 2008; TENÓRIO, 2005). |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/9079/23797 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2014); 221 a 236 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2014); 221 a 236 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 12 n. 2 (2014); 221 a 236 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943209357836288 |