Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477 |
Resumo: | Four decades after the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment, and just a few months after Rio+20, this paper aims to deepen the path followed by the global agenda of sustainable development, since Rio+92 until the challenges, mostly frustrated, faced by the conference recently held in Rio de Janeiro. For this purpose, the advances and regressions in this agenda were identified, as well as the preparatory process, the results achieved in Rio+20 and the threats posed by the new global environmental agenda. The methodology adopted has a qualitative focus, by using a discourse approach with regard to the first stage of data analysis and a correlation between the work by Jared Diamond, 2006, and Rio+20, as a complementary phase. The paper concludes that the discourses of food security, deficient gross domestic product (GDP), scientific credibility, green economy, and the private sector importance for sustainable development stood out during the 2012 summit. Furthermore, analyzing the prospects of the international agenda in the coming years, the paper concludes that the world faces nowadays a clearly political deficit with regard to the implementation of decisions which have already been repeatedly adopted. In other words, the major challenge for sustainable development today is the inability of specific actors, clearly identifiable, to take concrete actions. |
id |
FGV-9_b7bfeb00af7f7587d574d4b6a5366cfa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5477 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospectsDesenvolvimento sustentável na Rio+20: discursos, avanços, retrocessos e novas perspectivasFour decades after the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment, and just a few months after Rio+20, this paper aims to deepen the path followed by the global agenda of sustainable development, since Rio+92 until the challenges, mostly frustrated, faced by the conference recently held in Rio de Janeiro. For this purpose, the advances and regressions in this agenda were identified, as well as the preparatory process, the results achieved in Rio+20 and the threats posed by the new global environmental agenda. The methodology adopted has a qualitative focus, by using a discourse approach with regard to the first stage of data analysis and a correlation between the work by Jared Diamond, 2006, and Rio+20, as a complementary phase. The paper concludes that the discourses of food security, deficient gross domestic product (GDP), scientific credibility, green economy, and the private sector importance for sustainable development stood out during the 2012 summit. Furthermore, analyzing the prospects of the international agenda in the coming years, the paper concludes that the world faces nowadays a clearly political deficit with regard to the implementation of decisions which have already been repeatedly adopted. In other words, the major challenge for sustainable development today is the inability of specific actors, clearly identifiable, to take concrete actions. Depois de quatro décadas da Conferência de Estocolmo sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano, e decorridos apenas alguns meses da Rio+20, este artigo busca se aprofundar no caminho percorrido pela agenda global de desenvolvimento sustentável, a partir de Rio-92 até os desafios, em grande parte frustrados, da conferência recém concluída no Rio de Janeiro. Para tal propósito, foram identificados os avanços e retrocessos nesta agenda, o processo preparatório e resultados alcançados na Rio+20, bem como as ameaças provocadas pela nova agenda ambiental global. A metodologia adotada é de enfoque qualitativo, por meio da utilização de uma abordagem de discurso para primeira etapa de análise dos dados e uma correlação entre a obra de Jared Diamond de 2006 com a Rio+20, como fase complementar. O artigo conclui que os discursos da segurança alimentar, da insuficiência do Produto Interno Bruto (PIB), da credibilidade científica, da economia verde e da importância do setor privado para o desenvolvimento sustentável sobressaíram durante a cúpula de 2012. Além disso, ao analisar as perspectivas da agenda internacional nos próximos anos, o artigo conclui que atualmente o mundo enfrenta um déficit claramente político de implementação de decisões já adotadas reiteradamente. Ou seja, o maior desafio atual para o desenvolvimento sustentável é a incapacidade de ações concretas de atores específicos e claramente identificáveis.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2012-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 532Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 532Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 10 n. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 5321679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477/4199Guimarães, RobertoFontoura, Yunainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-02-23T19:25:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5477Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:41.745772Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects Desenvolvimento sustentável na Rio+20: discursos, avanços, retrocessos e novas perspectivas |
title |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
spellingShingle |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects Guimarães, Roberto |
title_short |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
title_full |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
title_fullStr |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
title_sort |
Sustainable development in Rio+20: discourses, advances, regressions and new prospects |
author |
Guimarães, Roberto |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Roberto Fontoura, Yuna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fontoura, Yuna |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Roberto Fontoura, Yuna |
description |
Four decades after the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment, and just a few months after Rio+20, this paper aims to deepen the path followed by the global agenda of sustainable development, since Rio+92 until the challenges, mostly frustrated, faced by the conference recently held in Rio de Janeiro. For this purpose, the advances and regressions in this agenda were identified, as well as the preparatory process, the results achieved in Rio+20 and the threats posed by the new global environmental agenda. The methodology adopted has a qualitative focus, by using a discourse approach with regard to the first stage of data analysis and a correlation between the work by Jared Diamond, 2006, and Rio+20, as a complementary phase. The paper concludes that the discourses of food security, deficient gross domestic product (GDP), scientific credibility, green economy, and the private sector importance for sustainable development stood out during the 2012 summit. Furthermore, analyzing the prospects of the international agenda in the coming years, the paper concludes that the world faces nowadays a clearly political deficit with regard to the implementation of decisions which have already been repeatedly adopted. In other words, the major challenge for sustainable development today is the inability of specific actors, clearly identifiable, to take concrete actions. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5477/4199 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 532 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 532 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 10 n. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 508 a 532 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943208592375808 |