The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102 |
Resumo: | This research focuses on institutional changes that happened during the formation of a software organizational field on a peripheral region. The objective is to describe these changes and investigate the influence of the institutional environments. The adoption of case study in this research is justified by the complex nature and singularity of the object and the exploration of theoretical shortcomings. One fundamental change observed was the breaking with the professional norm of “exclusive duty” by the university teachers (GREENWOOD; SUDDABY; HININGS, 2002); and another one was the surpassing of legitimacy threshold by the new ventures (ZIMMERMAN; ZEITZ, 2002). While the peripheral context allowed an institutional malleability that seems to have favored the linkage between the university and the firms, the semi-peripheral context facilitated the provision of the “entrepreneurial consumers”. A critical appraisal of a concept of organizational field that emphasizes the interactions among the field actors themselves (SCOTT, 1994, p. 207-208) is made because it tends to obstruct a deep analysis of organizational fields that extends through disparate environments. |
id |
FGV-9_ce16a7427be190931a1e082634aa2af9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5102 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open systemA criação de um setor de software entre os contextos periférico e semiperiférico: o campo organizacional como um sistema abertoThis research focuses on institutional changes that happened during the formation of a software organizational field on a peripheral region. The objective is to describe these changes and investigate the influence of the institutional environments. The adoption of case study in this research is justified by the complex nature and singularity of the object and the exploration of theoretical shortcomings. One fundamental change observed was the breaking with the professional norm of “exclusive duty” by the university teachers (GREENWOOD; SUDDABY; HININGS, 2002); and another one was the surpassing of legitimacy threshold by the new ventures (ZIMMERMAN; ZEITZ, 2002). While the peripheral context allowed an institutional malleability that seems to have favored the linkage between the university and the firms, the semi-peripheral context facilitated the provision of the “entrepreneurial consumers”. A critical appraisal of a concept of organizational field that emphasizes the interactions among the field actors themselves (SCOTT, 1994, p. 207-208) is made because it tends to obstruct a deep analysis of organizational fields that extends through disparate environments.Este artigo focaliza mudanças institucionais incidentes na formação de um campo organizacional de software ancorado numa região periférica. Seu objetivo é descrever essas mudanças e investigar a influência do ambiente institucional no surgimento do campo. É adotado o estudo de caso, pois se trata de um objeto de natureza complexa e peculiar, sendo exploradas insuficiências teóricas no conceito de campo organizacional. Uma mudança fundamental observada foi o rompimento - por parte dos professores universitários - com a norma da “dedicação exclusiva” (GREENWOOD; SUDDABY; HININGS, 2002) e a outra, a ultrapassagem do limiar da legitimação (ZIMMERMAN; ZEITZ, 2002) das empresas. Enquanto o contexto periférico pareceu propiciar uma maleabilidade institucional na intermediação entre universidade e empresas, o ambiente semiperiférico proveu empresas que podem ser consideradas “consumidores empreendedores”. Uma contribuição teórica reside na crítica à conceituação de campo organizacional, segundo a qual seus participantes, a priori, “interagem mais freqüente e decisivamente uns com os outros do que com atores de fora do campo” (SCOTT, apud SCOTT; DAVIS, 2007, p. 118), pois ela tende a obstruir o aprofundamento da análise de um campo que atravessa díspares ambientes institucionais.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2009); 1 a 18Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2009); 1 a 18Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 7 n. 1 (2009); 1 a 181679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102/3836Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-10T17:19:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5102Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:28.509179Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system A criação de um setor de software entre os contextos periférico e semiperiférico: o campo organizacional como um sistema aberto |
title |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
spellingShingle |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa |
title_short |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
title_full |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
title_fullStr |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
title_full_unstemmed |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
title_sort |
The creation of a software sector between peripheral and semiperipheral contexts: the organizational field as an open system |
author |
Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa |
author_facet |
Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa |
description |
This research focuses on institutional changes that happened during the formation of a software organizational field on a peripheral region. The objective is to describe these changes and investigate the influence of the institutional environments. The adoption of case study in this research is justified by the complex nature and singularity of the object and the exploration of theoretical shortcomings. One fundamental change observed was the breaking with the professional norm of “exclusive duty” by the university teachers (GREENWOOD; SUDDABY; HININGS, 2002); and another one was the surpassing of legitimacy threshold by the new ventures (ZIMMERMAN; ZEITZ, 2002). While the peripheral context allowed an institutional malleability that seems to have favored the linkage between the university and the firms, the semi-peripheral context facilitated the provision of the “entrepreneurial consumers”. A critical appraisal of a concept of organizational field that emphasizes the interactions among the field actors themselves (SCOTT, 1994, p. 207-208) is made because it tends to obstruct a deep analysis of organizational fields that extends through disparate environments. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5102/3836 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2009); 1 a 18 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2009); 1 a 18 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 7 n. 1 (2009); 1 a 18 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943207314161665 |