Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097 |
Resumo: | A critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach. |
id |
FGV-9_f5410a8d964727a20af4e4068ee4eafb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/52097 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable DevelopmentEnfoque grassroots y resistencia: actualizando la concepción de desarrollo sostenibleAbordagem grassroots e resistência: atualizando a concepção de desenvolvimento sustentávelSustainable DevelopmentGrassroots ApproachResistanceDesarrollo sostenibleEnfoque grassrootsResistenciaDesenvolvimento SustentávelAbordagem GrassrootsResistênciaA critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach.En contrapartida a las especificidades impositivas del modelo de producción capitalista, incluyendo en dicho modelo los meandros de los arreglos productivos que encuadran al medioambiente como alineado con la versión triple de la concepción tradicional de desarrollo sostenible, ha surgido una masa crítica de literatura que enfoca la resistencia en relación con el modo de funcionamiento del capitalismo occidental. Con relación a la teoría, economía solidaria (pilar económico), movimientos sociales (pilar social), ecología política (pilar ambiental) y raíces culturales (pilar cultural) son instrumentos importantes que no deben dejarse al margen en la estructuración de una concepción alternativa de desarrollo sostenible. Tales instrumentos son considerados elementos de resistencia, por tener características diferenciadas al compararlos con las características tradicionales de los pilares de la criticada concepción de desarrollo sostenible. Así, el objetivo del presente ensayo teórico es concebir alternativas a la concepción estándar de desarrollo sostenible, considerando aspectos del enfoque grassroots significativos para este propósito. La contribución es relevante teniendo en cuenta la consideración de aspectos alternativos y complementarios involucrados en la lectura de la actualización conjeturada. Los prospectos del desarrollo grassroots se usaron como guía práctica en acciones de desarrollo local que involucraron comunidades menos desarrolladas en varias partes del mundo, sin la conjetura que apunta hacia elementos conceptuales que pueden ofrecer una conformación alternativa a la concepción de desarrollo sostenible. Se concluye que la versión tradicional de desarrollo sostenible puede actualizarse con elementos alternativos derivados del enfoque grassroots.Em contrapartida às especificidades impositivas do modelo de produção capitalista – incluindo-se nesse modelo os meandros de arranjos produtivos que inserem o meio ambiente enquanto alinhado à versão tríplice da concepção tradicional de desenvolvimento sustentável –, tem surgido uma massa crítica de literatura focada na resistência ao modo de funcionamento do capitalismo ocidental. Em relação à teoria, economia solidária (pilar econômico), movimentos sociais (pilar social), ecologia política (pilar ambiental) e raízes culturais (pilar cultural) são aparatos importantes que não devem ficar à margem na estruturação de uma concepção alternativa do desenvolvimento sustentável. Tais aparatos são considerados elementos de resistência, visto terem fatores diferenciados quando comparados com as características tradicionais dos pilares da criticada concepção de desenvolvimento sustentável. Assim, o objetivo do presente ensaio teórico é conceber alternativas à concepção padrão do desenvolvimento sustentável, considerando aspectos da abordagem grassroots importantes para esse propósito. A contribuição é relevante tendo em vista a consideração de aspectos alternativos e complementares envolvidos na leitura da atualização conjecturada. Os prospectos do desenvolvimento grassroots têm sido usados como guia prático em ações de desenvolvimento local envolvendo comunidades menos desenvolvidas em várias partes do mundo, sem a conjectura que sinaliza para elementos conceituais que podem oferecer uma conformação alternativa à concepção do desenvolvimento sustentável. Conclui-se que a versão tradicional do desenvolvimento sustentável pode ser atualizada com elementos alternativos advindos da abordagem grassroots.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-09-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2017); 651-666Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2017); 651-666Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 3 (2017); 651-6661679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69407https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69481Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho deMatos, Fátima Regina NeyMesquita, Rafael Fernandes deMachado, Diego de Queiroz2017-09-29T14:52:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/52097Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:57.354338Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development Enfoque grassroots y resistencia: actualizando la concepción de desarrollo sostenible Abordagem grassroots e resistência: atualizando a concepção de desenvolvimento sustentável |
title |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
spellingShingle |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de Sustainable Development Grassroots Approach Resistance Desarrollo sostenible Enfoque grassroots Resistencia Desenvolvimento Sustentável Abordagem Grassroots Resistência |
title_short |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
title_full |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
title_fullStr |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
title_sort |
Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development |
author |
Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de |
author_facet |
Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de Matos, Fátima Regina Ney Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de Machado, Diego de Queiroz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Fátima Regina Ney Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de Machado, Diego de Queiroz |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de Matos, Fátima Regina Ney Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de Machado, Diego de Queiroz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustainable Development Grassroots Approach Resistance Desarrollo sostenible Enfoque grassroots Resistencia Desenvolvimento Sustentável Abordagem Grassroots Resistência |
topic |
Sustainable Development Grassroots Approach Resistance Desarrollo sostenible Enfoque grassroots Resistencia Desenvolvimento Sustentável Abordagem Grassroots Resistência |
description |
A critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69407 https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69481 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2017); 651-666 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2017); 651-666 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 3 (2017); 651-666 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210740908032 |