Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Matos, Fátima Regina Ney, Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de, Machado, Diego de Queiroz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097
Resumo: A critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach.
id FGV-9_f5410a8d964727a20af4e4068ee4eafb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/52097
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable DevelopmentEnfoque grassroots y resistencia: actualizando la concepción de desarrollo sostenibleAbordagem grassroots e resistência: atualizando a concepção de desenvolvimento sustentávelSustainable DevelopmentGrassroots ApproachResistanceDesarrollo sostenibleEnfoque grassrootsResistenciaDesenvolvimento SustentávelAbordagem GrassrootsResistênciaA critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach.En contrapartida a las especificidades impositivas del modelo de producción capitalista, incluyendo en dicho modelo los meandros de los arreglos productivos que encuadran al medioambiente como alineado con la versión triple de la concepción tradicional de desarrollo sostenible, ha surgido una masa crítica de literatura que enfoca la resistencia en relación con el modo de funcionamiento del capitalismo occidental. Con relación a la teoría, economía solidaria (pilar económico), movimientos sociales (pilar social), ecología política (pilar ambiental) y raíces culturales (pilar cultural) son instrumentos importantes que no deben dejarse al margen en la estructuración de una concepción alternativa de desarrollo sostenible. Tales instrumentos son considerados elementos de resistencia, por tener características diferenciadas al compararlos con las características tradicionales de los pilares de la criticada concepción de desarrollo sostenible. Así, el objetivo del presente ensayo teórico es concebir alternativas a la concepción estándar de desarrollo sostenible, considerando aspectos del enfoque grassroots significativos para este propósito. La contribución es relevante teniendo en cuenta la consideración de aspectos alternativos y complementarios involucrados en la lectura de la actualización conjeturada. Los prospectos del desarrollo grassroots se usaron como guía práctica en acciones de desarrollo local que involucraron comunidades menos desarrolladas en varias partes del mundo, sin la conjetura que apunta hacia elementos conceptuales que pueden ofrecer una conformación alternativa a la concepción de desarrollo sostenible. Se concluye que la versión tradicional de desarrollo sostenible puede actualizarse con elementos alternativos derivados del enfoque grassroots.Em contrapartida às especificidades impositivas do modelo de produção capitalista – incluindo-se nesse modelo os meandros de arranjos produtivos que inserem o meio ambiente enquanto alinhado à versão tríplice da concepção tradicional de desenvolvimento sustentável –, tem surgido uma massa crítica de literatura focada na resistência ao modo de funcionamento do capitalismo ocidental. Em relação à teoria, economia solidária (pilar econômico), movimentos sociais (pilar social), ecologia política (pilar ambiental) e raízes culturais (pilar cultural) são aparatos importantes que não devem ficar à margem na estruturação de uma concepção alternativa do desenvolvimento sustentável. Tais aparatos são considerados elementos de resistência, visto terem fatores diferenciados quando comparados com as características tradicionais dos pilares da criticada concepção de desenvolvimento sustentável. Assim, o objetivo do presente ensaio teórico é conceber alternativas à concepção padrão do desenvolvimento sustentável, considerando aspectos da abordagem grassroots importantes para esse propósito. A contribuição é relevante tendo em vista a consideração de aspectos alternativos e complementares envolvidos na leitura da atualização conjecturada. Os prospectos do desenvolvimento grassroots têm sido usados como guia prático em ações de desenvolvimento local envolvendo comunidades menos desenvolvidas em várias partes do mundo, sem a conjectura que sinaliza para elementos conceituais que podem oferecer uma  conformação alternativa à concepção do desenvolvimento sustentável. Conclui-se que a versão tradicional do desenvolvimento sustentável pode ser atualizada com elementos alternativos advindos da abordagem grassroots.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-09-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2017); 651-666Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2017); 651-666Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 3 (2017); 651-6661679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69407https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69481Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho deMatos, Fátima Regina NeyMesquita, Rafael Fernandes deMachado, Diego de Queiroz2017-09-29T14:52:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/52097Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:57.354338Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
Enfoque grassroots y resistencia: actualizando la concepción de desarrollo sostenible
Abordagem grassroots e resistência: atualizando a concepção de desenvolvimento sustentável
title Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
spellingShingle Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de
Sustainable Development
Grassroots Approach
Resistance
Desarrollo sostenible
Enfoque grassroots
Resistencia
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Abordagem Grassroots
Resistência
title_short Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
title_full Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
title_fullStr Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
title_full_unstemmed Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
title_sort Grassroots Approach and Resistance: Upgrading the Concept of Sustainable Development
author Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de
author_facet Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de
Matos, Fátima Regina Ney
Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de
Machado, Diego de Queiroz
author_role author
author2 Matos, Fátima Regina Ney
Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de
Machado, Diego de Queiroz
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de
Matos, Fátima Regina Ney
Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de
Machado, Diego de Queiroz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainable Development
Grassroots Approach
Resistance
Desarrollo sostenible
Enfoque grassroots
Resistencia
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Abordagem Grassroots
Resistência
topic Sustainable Development
Grassroots Approach
Resistance
Desarrollo sostenible
Enfoque grassroots
Resistencia
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Abordagem Grassroots
Resistência
description A critical body of literature has emerged focusing on the spectrum of resistance against impositions engendered by the modus operandum of western capitalism, including the nuances of the productive patterns considering the environment as a device attached to the triple bottom line of the traditional view of sustainable development. Regarding the theory, solidarity economy (economic pillar), social movements (social pillar), political ecology (environmental pillar), and cultural roots (cultural pillar) are important apparatus that cannot be left behind if an alternative concept of sustainable development is to be structured. This article considers such apparatus as having elements of resistance, since they have different characteristics when compared to the standard features of the pillars that form the base of the criticized conception of sustainable development. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to conceive alternative elements to the standard concept of sustainable development, considering aspects of the grassroots approach. This study is relevant as it offers alternative and complementary elements in order to provide an understanding of the updated conjectures. The prospects of grassroots development, involving less developed communities worldwide, are being used as practical guidelines in local development actions. They have rarely been conjectured as conceptual elements to offer a new format for the conception of sustainable development. This article concludes that the traditional version of sustainable development can be upgraded with the alternative elements emerging from the grassroots approach.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69407
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/52097/69481
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2017); 651-666
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2017); 651-666
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 15 n. 3 (2017); 651-666
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210740908032