Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha Neto, João Mendes da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Borges, Djalma Freire
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005
Resumo: Public policies have been studied with various theoretical aspects as a basis. However, there is still a gap on issues related to the interconnection of actions taken by government agencies. These dimensions, when addressed, do not get close to the perspective of impacts derived from the architecture of coalition presidentialism on public policies, which, in the Brazilian case, corroborates its fragmentation and competition between government agencies that should work in an interconnected way. This article aims at identifying where this problem is expressed and the inflection point between the discourse of coordinated action and an implementation showing the opposite. To demonstrate how this occurs, we chose the Brazilian Program for Promoting Sustainability in Sub-Regional Spaces (PROMESO), which has shared agendas as one of its significant instruments. Research construction required a theoretical review that focuses on the institutional architecture of coalition presidentialism and political parties, besides adopting, in empirical investigation, the database of the Brazilian Federal Budget Department (SOF/MPOG) and the Brazilian Interconnected System of Government Financial Administration (SIAFI/MF), which enabled us to spatialize the distribution of public resources according to a party and region-based rationale, and refer to official documents from the Brazilian Ministry of National Integration (MI) that characterize the program addressed in this study. The research proved that coalition presidentialism directly affects public policies, highlighting a competitive nature between the federal government agencies, due to particular rationales, determined by directors at these institutions.
id FGV-9_ff81e94c85d7278f057b45cbce9b2d13
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/15005
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESOPolíticas públicas coordinadas y presidencialismo de coalición: el caso de PROMESOPolíticas públicas coordenadas e presidencialismo de coalizão: o caso do PROMESOPublic policies. Competition. Coalition presidentialism. Political parties. PROMESO.Políticas públicasCompetenciaPresidencialismo de coaliciónPartidos políticosPROMESO.Public policies have been studied with various theoretical aspects as a basis. However, there is still a gap on issues related to the interconnection of actions taken by government agencies. These dimensions, when addressed, do not get close to the perspective of impacts derived from the architecture of coalition presidentialism on public policies, which, in the Brazilian case, corroborates its fragmentation and competition between government agencies that should work in an interconnected way. This article aims at identifying where this problem is expressed and the inflection point between the discourse of coordinated action and an implementation showing the opposite. To demonstrate how this occurs, we chose the Brazilian Program for Promoting Sustainability in Sub-Regional Spaces (PROMESO), which has shared agendas as one of its significant instruments. Research construction required a theoretical review that focuses on the institutional architecture of coalition presidentialism and political parties, besides adopting, in empirical investigation, the database of the Brazilian Federal Budget Department (SOF/MPOG) and the Brazilian Interconnected System of Government Financial Administration (SIAFI/MF), which enabled us to spatialize the distribution of public resources according to a party and region-based rationale, and refer to official documents from the Brazilian Ministry of National Integration (MI) that characterize the program addressed in this study. The research proved that coalition presidentialism directly affects public policies, highlighting a competitive nature between the federal government agencies, due to particular rationales, determined by directors at these institutions.Las políticas públicas se han estudiado con diversos aspectos teóricos como base. Sin embargo, aún existe una laguna en cuestiones relacionadas con la integración de acciones de agencias gubernamentales. Estas dimensiones, cuando se estudian, no se acercan a la perspectiva de impactos derivados de la arquitectura del presidencialismo de coalición sobre las políticas públicas, que, en el caso brasileño, corrobora su fragmentación y competencia entre agencias gubernamentales que deberían operar de manera interconectada. Este artículo tiene como objetivo identificar donde este problema se expresa y el punto de inflexión entre el discurso de la acción coordinada y la implementación que muestra lo contrario. Para demostrar cómo se produce esto, elegimos el Programa de Promoción de la Sostenibilidad de Espacios Sub-Regionales de Brasil (PROMESO), que ha compartido agendas como uno de sus instrumentos importantes. La construcción de la investigación ha demandado una revisión teórica que se centró en la arquitectura institucional del presidencialismo de coalición y los partidos políticos, además de adoptar, en la investigación empírica, la base de datos de la Secretaria de Presupuesto Federal de Brasil (SOF/MPOG) y el Sistema Integrado de Administración Financiera del Gobierno (SIAFI/MF), que permitieron espacializar la distribución de los recursos públicos según las lógicas partidistas y regionalizadas, y consultar documentos oficiales del Ministerio de la Integración Nacional de Brasil (MI) que caracterizan el programa que constituye el objeto de este estudio. La investigación demostró que el presidencialismo de coalición afecta directamente a las políticas públicas, lo que muestra una naturaleza competitiva entre las agencias del gobierno federal, debido a lógicas particulares, determinadas por los directores de estas instituciones.As políticas públicas têm sido estudadas com base em diferentes aspectos teóricos. No entanto, ainda persiste uma lacuna nas questões relacionadas à integração de ações das agências governamentais. Essas dimensões, quando estudadas, pouco se aproximam da perspectiva dos impactos decorrentes da arquitetura do presidencialismo de coalizão sobre as políticas públicas, que, no caso brasileiro, corrobora sua fragmentação e competição entre agências governamentais que deveriam atuar de forma integrada. Este artigo objetiva identificar onde esse problema se manifesta e o ponto de inflexão entre o discurso da ação coordenada e a implementação que evidencia o contrário. Para demonstrar como isso ocorre foi escolhido o Programa de Promoção da Sustentabilidade de Espaços Sub-Regionais (Promeso), que tem agendas compartilhadas como um de seus importantes instrumentos. A elaboração da pesquisa demandou uma revisão teórica que se debruçou sobre a arquitetura institucional do presidencialismo de coalizão e dos partidos políticos, além de adotar, na pesquisa empírica, a base de dados da Secretaria de Orçamento Federal (SOF/MPOG) e do Sistema Integrado de Administração Financeira do Governo (Siafi/MF), que permitiram espacializar a distribuição dos recursos públicos segundo as lógicas partidárias e regionalizadas, e consultar documentos oficiais do Ministério da Integração Nacional (MI) que caracterizam o programa objeto deste estudo. A pesquisa comprovou que o presidencialismo de coalizão afeta diretamente as políticas públicas, evidenciando um caráter competitivo entre as agências do governo federal, em razão das lógicas particularizadas, determinadas pelos dirigentes dessas instituições.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. Special (2016) - Public Policies in their Multiple Dimensions; 440 a 472Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. Especial (2016) - Políticas Públicas en Múltiples Dimensiones; 440 a 472Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. Especial (2016) - Políticas Públicas em Múltiplas Dimensões; 440 a 4721679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005/61340Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha Neto, João Mendes daBorges, Djalma Freire2023-02-23T19:20:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/15005Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:49.734637Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
Políticas públicas coordinadas y presidencialismo de coalición: el caso de PROMESO
Políticas públicas coordenadas e presidencialismo de coalizão: o caso do PROMESO
title Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
spellingShingle Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
Rocha Neto, João Mendes da
Public policies. Competition. Coalition presidentialism. Political parties. PROMESO.
Políticas públicas
Competencia
Presidencialismo de coalición
Partidos políticos
PROMESO.
title_short Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
title_full Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
title_fullStr Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
title_full_unstemmed Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
title_sort Coordinated public policies and coalition presidentialism: the case of PROMESO
author Rocha Neto, João Mendes da
author_facet Rocha Neto, João Mendes da
Borges, Djalma Freire
author_role author
author2 Borges, Djalma Freire
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha Neto, João Mendes da
Borges, Djalma Freire
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public policies. Competition. Coalition presidentialism. Political parties. PROMESO.
Políticas públicas
Competencia
Presidencialismo de coalición
Partidos políticos
PROMESO.
topic Public policies. Competition. Coalition presidentialism. Political parties. PROMESO.
Políticas públicas
Competencia
Presidencialismo de coalición
Partidos políticos
PROMESO.
description Public policies have been studied with various theoretical aspects as a basis. However, there is still a gap on issues related to the interconnection of actions taken by government agencies. These dimensions, when addressed, do not get close to the perspective of impacts derived from the architecture of coalition presidentialism on public policies, which, in the Brazilian case, corroborates its fragmentation and competition between government agencies that should work in an interconnected way. This article aims at identifying where this problem is expressed and the inflection point between the discourse of coordinated action and an implementation showing the opposite. To demonstrate how this occurs, we chose the Brazilian Program for Promoting Sustainability in Sub-Regional Spaces (PROMESO), which has shared agendas as one of its significant instruments. Research construction required a theoretical review that focuses on the institutional architecture of coalition presidentialism and political parties, besides adopting, in empirical investigation, the database of the Brazilian Federal Budget Department (SOF/MPOG) and the Brazilian Interconnected System of Government Financial Administration (SIAFI/MF), which enabled us to spatialize the distribution of public resources according to a party and region-based rationale, and refer to official documents from the Brazilian Ministry of National Integration (MI) that characterize the program addressed in this study. The research proved that coalition presidentialism directly affects public policies, highlighting a competitive nature between the federal government agencies, due to particular rationales, determined by directors at these institutions.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15005/61340
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. Special (2016) - Public Policies in their Multiple Dimensions; 440 a 472
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. Especial (2016) - Políticas Públicas en Múltiples Dimensiones; 440 a 472
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. Especial (2016) - Políticas Públicas em Múltiplas Dimensões; 440 a 472
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943209952378880

Registros relacionados