Estágio probatório e reformas na gestão pública: um estudo de caso da avaliação no início de carreira no estado de São Paulo

• Autor(a) principal: Sudano, Andréia Di Camilla Ghirghi Pires
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/8226
• topic: Reformas do serviço público; Meritocracia; Gestão de pessoas no setor público; Administração pública; Administração de recursos humanos; Estágio probatório; Serviço público - Administração de pessoal; Servidores públicos; Reforma administrativa - Brasil

This study examines the use of probation period in Brazil to assess whether there were changes in its use from the reforms in the 1990s. The literature indicates the ineffectiveness of this evaluation under the same difficulties found in other instruments of human resources policy of the state, such as through the selection and the implementation of individual performance evaluation. The research outlined the history of the use of probation in Brazil identified the aspects that constitute it and, through three case studies, evaluated the use of probation period in three carriers of the state government of Sao Paulo in which to understand if there were changes in its use after the changes established by constitutional amendment No. 19, 1998. The main conclusion emphasizes that the probation period was present and was reinforced by the general rules relating to public servants, but there was never a movement to make an effective evaluation of probation period, which kept the margin of the discussions of the merit-based selection, which emphasized the importance of public procurement; and undermined by the extension of the right of stability to all employees regardless of income per contest or an effective evaluation process. Moreover, it incorporated the difficulties of implementing performance assessments in the Brazilian public sector. However, the three cases evaluated showed incorporate incremental changes in utilization for the probationary period after 1998, with distinct characteristics according to the corresponding careers and public policy developed by the Secretariat. It is not possible to assert its ineffectiveness.