Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caciatori Jr., Itamir
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
Texto Completo: https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537
Resumo: Purpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies.
id FIA-1_2bda5a86d03b0ab5f02e0e9c46726123
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/537
network_acronym_str FIA-1
network_name_str Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
repository_id_str
spelling Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical DataFintechfinancial technologiesCategoriesCluster analysisIncumbent banksPurpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies.Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies2021-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/53710.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 13 n. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-4082175-5825reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinstname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)instacron:FIAenghttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537/495Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategieshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaciatori Jr., ItamirMussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula2021-12-13T21:08:17Zoai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/537Revistahttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/oai2175-58252175-5825opendoar:2021-12-13T21:08:17Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
title Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
spellingShingle Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
Caciatori Jr., Itamir
Fintech
financial technologies
Categories
Cluster analysis
Incumbent banks
title_short Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
title_full Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
title_fullStr Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
title_full_unstemmed Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
title_sort Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
author Caciatori Jr., Itamir
author_facet Caciatori Jr., Itamir
Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
author_role author
author2 Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caciatori Jr., Itamir
Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fintech
financial technologies
Categories
Cluster analysis
Incumbent banks
topic Fintech
financial technologies
Categories
Cluster analysis
Incumbent banks
description Purpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537
10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537
url https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537
identifier_str_mv 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537/495
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 13 n. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408
2175-5825
reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
instname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
instacron:FIA
instname_str Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
instacron_str FIA
institution FIA
reponame_str Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
collection Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
repository.name.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808843618197176320