Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537 |
Resumo: | Purpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies. |
id |
FIA-1_2bda5a86d03b0ab5f02e0e9c46726123 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/537 |
network_acronym_str |
FIA-1 |
network_name_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical DataFintechfinancial technologiesCategoriesCluster analysisIncumbent banksPurpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies.Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies2021-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/53710.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 13 n. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-4082175-5825reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinstname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)instacron:FIAenghttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537/495Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategieshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaciatori Jr., ItamirMussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula2021-12-13T21:08:17Zoai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/537Revistahttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/oai2175-58252175-5825opendoar:2021-12-13T21:08:17Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
title |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
spellingShingle |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data Caciatori Jr., Itamir Fintech financial technologies Categories Cluster analysis Incumbent banks |
title_short |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
title_full |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
title_fullStr |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
title_sort |
Defining categories of Fintechs: A Categorization Proposal Based on Literature and Empirical Data |
author |
Caciatori Jr., Itamir |
author_facet |
Caciatori Jr., Itamir Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caciatori Jr., Itamir Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fintech financial technologies Categories Cluster analysis Incumbent banks |
topic |
Fintech financial technologies Categories Cluster analysis Incumbent banks |
description |
Purpose – The analysis of the competitive impact of FinTechs requires the standardization of their categories to compare their products and services with the already delivered by incumbent banks. In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content and cluster analysis.Theoretical framework – The literature about FinTechs. In our bibliographical research, we do not find works aiming to present a standard definition of categories of FinTechs. This type of work is almost nonexistent and categorization of FinTechs is defined as a “blurry issue”.Design/methodology/approach – In this study, we address the problem of the multiplicity of FinTechs categories and provide a solution using content analysis, cluster analysis, and the software Gephi.Findings – The result is a model comprised of nine FinTechs categories: Payments and Transfers; Exchange; Lending; Insurance; Investments; Advice; B2B; Digital Banks; and Others. We also elaborate a portfolio with 157 products and services offered by Brazilian incumbent banks, which allows the comparison between these two types of companies.Originality/value – The main contribution is the use of objective criteria and existing literature, as well as Gephi software, to build categories of FinTechs analysis, an emerging theme in financial market studies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537 |
url |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2021.v13i3.537 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/537/495 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 13 n. 3 (2021): September - December; 386-408 2175-5825 reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies instname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) instacron:FIA |
instname_str |
Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
instacron_str |
FIA |
institution |
FIA |
reponame_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
collection |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808843618197176320 |