Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Fitos |
Texto Completo: | https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799 |
Resumo: | Psychotria ipecacuanha, is a plant species with known medicinal properties that is critically endangered due to overexploitation of natural populations. Although the difficulties in conventional propagation by seed and by vegetative propagation are generally understood, the present study enhances our knowledge by describing efficient plant regeneration and root induction protocols for P. ipecacuanha while comparing alkaloid content (emetine and cephaeline) in in vitro-derived tissues. Stem node explants were cultured on MS medium MS supplemented with indolbutiric acid (IBA) in semi-solid media and the RITA® temporary immersion bioreactor. The highest root formation (81%) was in MS + 1.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor. After 24 months of acclimatization, the plants cultivated in MS + 0.50 and 1.0 mg L-1 of IBA had the highest number of roots (3), with mean values of 10.47 and 9.40 cm, respectively. The cultures coming from 1.0 mg L−1 and 0.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor contained higher cephaeline content, with a relative area of 14.2 and 14.9%, respectively. For emetine, the 1.0 mg L−1 IBA cultures in the bioreactor, 0.5 mg L−1 IBA and MS0 cultures contained higher content than the other treatments, with a relative area of 10.2, 10.2 and 10.1%, respectively. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-1_2f2c1bb8b98dcdc1e4ccf0caeaa3f875 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br:article/799 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Fitos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactorProdução e regulação de emetina e cefelina por propagação in vitro de Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes em meio semi-sólido e biorreator de imersão temporáriaplant biotechnologytissue cultureipecacemetinecephaelineBiotecnologia de plantas. Cultura de tecidos. Ipecac. Imersão temporária. Metabólitos secundários.Psychotria ipecacuanha, is a plant species with known medicinal properties that is critically endangered due to overexploitation of natural populations. Although the difficulties in conventional propagation by seed and by vegetative propagation are generally understood, the present study enhances our knowledge by describing efficient plant regeneration and root induction protocols for P. ipecacuanha while comparing alkaloid content (emetine and cephaeline) in in vitro-derived tissues. Stem node explants were cultured on MS medium MS supplemented with indolbutiric acid (IBA) in semi-solid media and the RITA® temporary immersion bioreactor. The highest root formation (81%) was in MS + 1.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor. After 24 months of acclimatization, the plants cultivated in MS + 0.50 and 1.0 mg L-1 of IBA had the highest number of roots (3), with mean values of 10.47 and 9.40 cm, respectively. The cultures coming from 1.0 mg L−1 and 0.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor contained higher cephaeline content, with a relative area of 14.2 and 14.9%, respectively. For emetine, the 1.0 mg L−1 IBA cultures in the bioreactor, 0.5 mg L−1 IBA and MS0 cultures contained higher content than the other treatments, with a relative area of 10.2, 10.2 and 10.1%, respectively.Psychotria ipecacuanha é uma espécie de planta com propriedades medicinais conhecidas, está criticamente ameaçada devido à superexploração de populações naturais. Embora as dificuldades na propagação convencional por sementes e vegetativa sejam geralmente compreendidas, este estudo descreveu protocolos eficientes de regeneração de plantas e indução de raízes para P. ipecacuanha, enquanto compara o conteúdo alcalóides (emetina e cefelina) em tecidos derivados in vitro . Explantes dos nódulos-tronco foram cultivados em meio MS, suplementado com ácido indolbutírico (AIB) em meio semi-sólido e o biorreator de imersão temporária RITA®. A maior formação radicular (81%) ocorreu em MS + 1,5 mg L-1 de AIB no biorreator. Após 24 meses de aclimatação, as plantas cultivadas em MS + 0,50 e 1,0 mg L-1 de AIB apresentaram o maior número de raízes (3), com valores médios de 10,47 e 9,40 cm, respectivamente. As culturas provenientes de 1,0 mg L-1 e 0,5 mg L-1 de AIB no biorreator, maior teor de cefelina, com área relativa de 14,2 e 14,9%, respectivamente. Para a emetina, as culturas de 1,0 mg L-1 de AIB no biorreator, as culturas de 0,5 mg L-1 de AIB e MS0 continham maior conteúdo s, com uma área relativa de 10,2, 10,2 e 10,1%, respectivamente.Centro de Inovação em Biodiversidade e Saúde - Farmanguinhos/Fiocruz2020-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/79910.32712/2446-4775.2020.799Revista Fitos; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020); 45-55Revista Fitos; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020); 45-55Revista Fitos; v. 14 n. 1 (2020); 45-552446-47751808-9569reponame:Revista Fitosinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799/646https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799/647Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Fitosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, SimoneAlencar, Danielle CardosoBenevides, Paulo José CoelhoAstolfi-Filho, Spartaco2020-09-30T14:59:31Zoai:ojs.revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br:article/799Revistahttps://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/PUBhttp://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/oairevistafitos@far.fiocruz.br || eugenio.telles@far.fiocruz.br2446-47752446-4775opendoar:2020-09-30T14:59:31Revista Fitos - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor Produção e regulação de emetina e cefelina por propagação in vitro de Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes em meio semi-sólido e biorreator de imersão temporária |
title |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
spellingShingle |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor da Silva, Simone plant biotechnology tissue culture ipecac emetine cephaeline Biotecnologia de plantas. Cultura de tecidos. Ipecac. Imersão temporária. Metabólitos secundários. |
title_short |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
title_full |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
title_fullStr |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
title_sort |
Emetine and cephaeline production and regulation by in vitro propagation of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes in semi-solid media and temporary immersion bioreactor |
author |
da Silva, Simone |
author_facet |
da Silva, Simone Alencar, Danielle Cardoso Benevides, Paulo José Coelho Astolfi-Filho, Spartaco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alencar, Danielle Cardoso Benevides, Paulo José Coelho Astolfi-Filho, Spartaco |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Simone Alencar, Danielle Cardoso Benevides, Paulo José Coelho Astolfi-Filho, Spartaco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
plant biotechnology tissue culture ipecac emetine cephaeline Biotecnologia de plantas. Cultura de tecidos. Ipecac. Imersão temporária. Metabólitos secundários. |
topic |
plant biotechnology tissue culture ipecac emetine cephaeline Biotecnologia de plantas. Cultura de tecidos. Ipecac. Imersão temporária. Metabólitos secundários. |
description |
Psychotria ipecacuanha, is a plant species with known medicinal properties that is critically endangered due to overexploitation of natural populations. Although the difficulties in conventional propagation by seed and by vegetative propagation are generally understood, the present study enhances our knowledge by describing efficient plant regeneration and root induction protocols for P. ipecacuanha while comparing alkaloid content (emetine and cephaeline) in in vitro-derived tissues. Stem node explants were cultured on MS medium MS supplemented with indolbutiric acid (IBA) in semi-solid media and the RITA® temporary immersion bioreactor. The highest root formation (81%) was in MS + 1.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor. After 24 months of acclimatization, the plants cultivated in MS + 0.50 and 1.0 mg L-1 of IBA had the highest number of roots (3), with mean values of 10.47 and 9.40 cm, respectively. The cultures coming from 1.0 mg L−1 and 0.5 mg L−1 IBA in the bioreactor contained higher cephaeline content, with a relative area of 14.2 and 14.9%, respectively. For emetine, the 1.0 mg L−1 IBA cultures in the bioreactor, 0.5 mg L−1 IBA and MS0 cultures contained higher content than the other treatments, with a relative area of 10.2, 10.2 and 10.1%, respectively. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799 10.32712/2446-4775.2020.799 |
url |
https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32712/2446-4775.2020.799 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799/646 https://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/799/647 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Fitos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Fitos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Inovação em Biodiversidade e Saúde - Farmanguinhos/Fiocruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Inovação em Biodiversidade e Saúde - Farmanguinhos/Fiocruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Fitos; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020); 45-55 Revista Fitos; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020); 45-55 Revista Fitos; v. 14 n. 1 (2020); 45-55 2446-4775 1808-9569 reponame:Revista Fitos instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Fitos |
collection |
Revista Fitos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Fitos - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistafitos@far.fiocruz.br || eugenio.telles@far.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798313474974023680 |