State secondary education: less funds for more students?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1915 |
Resumo: | The article provides an overview of some structural and conjunctural challenges for the funding of State education, particularly secondary education (the 3 years of schooling offered after the 8-year period of compulsory education), showing that the trend of governments has been to spend less per pupil, despite the official discourses exhalting the quality of education. The structural challenges examined include direct and indirect privatism of government policies, the non-compliance of a constitucional requirement that a certain percentage of taxes be invested in education, the loss of funds linked to education caused by inflation and fiscal policies, and the little reliability of Audit Offices. Among the conjunctural challenges we have examined the Fundef (a fund set up by the federal government to finance compulsory education), which leaves out the secondary education; the reduced federal contribution to the secondary education; and the fragility of the proposal contained in the 10-year National Education Plan and the 'judicious' use of public money. Finally, we examine the perspectives of education funding in Lula's government, which are not apparently bright in view of the emphasis of his government on the 'fiscal adjustment', the result of which was a reduction in real terms of the funds for education in 2003. We have also analysed the virtues and limits of the Fundeb (the Basic Education Fund). |
id |
FIOCRUZ-2_15837c8c8a9f60abde27c7c2a7ebea66 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1915 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-2 |
network_name_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
State secondary education: less funds for more students?Ensino médio estatal: menos verba para mais alunos?financiamento da educaçãoensino médioeducation fundingsecondary educationThe article provides an overview of some structural and conjunctural challenges for the funding of State education, particularly secondary education (the 3 years of schooling offered after the 8-year period of compulsory education), showing that the trend of governments has been to spend less per pupil, despite the official discourses exhalting the quality of education. The structural challenges examined include direct and indirect privatism of government policies, the non-compliance of a constitucional requirement that a certain percentage of taxes be invested in education, the loss of funds linked to education caused by inflation and fiscal policies, and the little reliability of Audit Offices. Among the conjunctural challenges we have examined the Fundef (a fund set up by the federal government to finance compulsory education), which leaves out the secondary education; the reduced federal contribution to the secondary education; and the fragility of the proposal contained in the 10-year National Education Plan and the 'judicious' use of public money. Finally, we examine the perspectives of education funding in Lula's government, which are not apparently bright in view of the emphasis of his government on the 'fiscal adjustment', the result of which was a reduction in real terms of the funds for education in 2003. We have also analysed the virtues and limits of the Fundeb (the Basic Education Fund).O artigo traça um panorama de alguns desafios estruturais e conjunturais para o financiamento da educação estatal, em particular o ensino médio, mostrando que a tendência dos governos tem sido no sentido de gastar menos por aluno, apesar dos discursos oficiais de exaltação da qualidade do ensino. Entre os desafios estruturais, incluem-se o privatismo direto e indireto das políticas oficiais, o descumprimento da exigência de aplicação da verba vinculada à manutenção e ao desenvolvimento do ensino, a perda de recursos vinculados causada pela inflação e pelas medidas de política fiscal, e a pouca confiabilidade dos Tribunais de Contas. Entre os desafios conjunturais, analisamos o Fundo de Manutenção e Desenvolvimento do Ensino Fundamental e de Valorização do Magistério (Fundef), que deixa de fora o ensino médio; a reduzida contribuição federal para o ensino médio; e a fragilidade da proposta do PNE (Plano Nacional de Educação) e o uso 'judicioso' do dinheiro público. Por fim, examinamos as perspectivas - pouco animadoras - de financiamento da educação no governo Lula: a ênfase do governo no 'ajuste fiscal', cuja conseqüência foi a diminuição, em termos reais, das verbas para a educação em 2003; e as virtudes e os limites do Fundeb (Fundo da Educação Básica).Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDebatesapplication/pdfhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/191510.1590/S1981-77462004000100010 Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 2 n. 1 (2004)1981-7746reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1915/985Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venânciohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDavies, Nicholas 2022-09-27T17:27:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1915Revistahttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tesPUBhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/oairevtes@fiocruz.br1981-77461678-1007opendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:52.758083Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? Ensino médio estatal: menos verba para mais alunos? |
title |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
spellingShingle |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? Davies, Nicholas financiamento da educação ensino médio education funding secondary education |
title_short |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
title_full |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
title_fullStr |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
title_full_unstemmed |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
title_sort |
State secondary education: less funds for more students? |
author |
Davies, Nicholas |
author_facet |
Davies, Nicholas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Davies, Nicholas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
financiamento da educação ensino médio education funding secondary education |
topic |
financiamento da educação ensino médio education funding secondary education |
description |
The article provides an overview of some structural and conjunctural challenges for the funding of State education, particularly secondary education (the 3 years of schooling offered after the 8-year period of compulsory education), showing that the trend of governments has been to spend less per pupil, despite the official discourses exhalting the quality of education. The structural challenges examined include direct and indirect privatism of government policies, the non-compliance of a constitucional requirement that a certain percentage of taxes be invested in education, the loss of funds linked to education caused by inflation and fiscal policies, and the little reliability of Audit Offices. Among the conjunctural challenges we have examined the Fundef (a fund set up by the federal government to finance compulsory education), which leaves out the secondary education; the reduced federal contribution to the secondary education; and the fragility of the proposal contained in the 10-year National Education Plan and the 'judicious' use of public money. Finally, we examine the perspectives of education funding in Lula's government, which are not apparently bright in view of the emphasis of his government on the 'fiscal adjustment', the result of which was a reduction in real terms of the funds for education in 2003. We have also analysed the virtues and limits of the Fundeb (the Basic Education Fund). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Debates |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1915 10.1590/S1981-77462004000100010 |
url |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1915 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1981-77462004000100010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1915/985 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 2 n. 1 (2004) 1981-7746 reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
collection |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revtes@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943474770247680 |