“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/568 |
Resumo: | The COVID-19 pandemic began in Brazil in March 2020. Since then, there have been several disagreements and disputes between health professionals, researchers and regulatory bodies about prescribed treatments for this infection. Given this scenario, this note proposes to discuss medical autonomy in the described context, based on official documents of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine, produced between 2020 and 2021, considering the mentioned therapeutic possibilities. As a result, three official documents were obtained that show that the only form of ‘autonomy’ is ‘medical autonomy’, while the ‘patient autonomy’ is not evidenced in terms of the adoption of therapies. We did not observe discussions in the documents about the bioethical principle of non- aleficence and that of autonomy itself. In this way, it can be seen that the appreciation of ‘medical autonomy’, without considering the knowledge/doings of patients, nor the scientific findings, can promote misunderstandings and harm the principles of medical practice. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-2_c82f070e0e459e392747ea6efa4177e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/568 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-2 |
network_name_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic“El médico brasileño sabe cómo tratar el Covid-19”: sentidos de la autonomía médica en la pandemia“O médico brasileiro sabe como tratar a Covid-19”: sentidos de autonomia médica na pandemiaAutonomia ProfissionalAutonomia PessoalConselho de SaúdeCOVID-19MedicinaProfessional AutonomyPersonal AutonomyHealth CouncilsCOVID-19MedicineAutonomía profesional Autonomía personalConsejo de saludCovid-19MedicinaThe COVID-19 pandemic began in Brazil in March 2020. Since then, there have been several disagreements and disputes between health professionals, researchers and regulatory bodies about prescribed treatments for this infection. Given this scenario, this note proposes to discuss medical autonomy in the described context, based on official documents of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine, produced between 2020 and 2021, considering the mentioned therapeutic possibilities. As a result, three official documents were obtained that show that the only form of ‘autonomy’ is ‘medical autonomy’, while the ‘patient autonomy’ is not evidenced in terms of the adoption of therapies. We did not observe discussions in the documents about the bioethical principle of non- aleficence and that of autonomy itself. In this way, it can be seen that the appreciation of ‘medical autonomy’, without considering the knowledge/doings of patients, nor the scientific findings, can promote misunderstandings and harm the principles of medical practice.La pandemia de Covid-19 comenzó en Brasil en marzo de 2020. Desde entonces, ha habido varios desacuerdos y disputas – entre profesionales de la salud, investigadores y organismos reguladores – sobre los tratamientos prescritos para esta infección. Ante ese escenario, esta nota se propone discutir la autonomía médica en el contexto descrito, a partir de documentos oficiales del Consejo Federal de Medicina de Brasil, producidos entre 2020 y 2021, considerando las posibilidades terapéuticas mencionadas. Como resultado, se obtuvieron tres documentos oficiales que muestran que la única forma de ‘autonomía’ es la ‘autonomía médica’, mientras que la ‘autonomía del paciente’ no se evidencia en cuanto a la adopción de terapias. No observamos discusiones en los documentos sobre el principio bioético de no maleficencia y el de la propia autonomía. De esta forma, se ve que la apreciación de la ‘autonomía médica’, sin considerar los saberes/ haceres de los pacientes y, tampoco, los hallazgos científicos, puede promover malentendidos y herir los principios del hacer médico.A pandemia de Covid-19 teve início no Brasil em março de 2020. Desde então, há diversas divergências e disputas, entre profissionais de saúde, pesquisadores e entidades regulamentadoras, sobre tratamentos prescritos para essa infecção. Diante desse cenário, esta nota se propõe a discutir a autonomia médica na conjuntura descrita, com base em documentos oficiais do Conselho Federal de Medicina brasileiro, produzidos entre 2020 e 2021, considerando as possibilidades terapêuticas mencionadas. Como resultado, foram obtidos três documentos oficiais que evidenciam como única forma de ‘autonomia’ a ‘autonomia médica’, enquanto a ‘autonomia do paciente’ não é evidenciada no que tange à adoção de terapêuticas. Não observamos discussões nos documentos sobre o princípio bioético da não maleficência e o da própria autonomia. Desta forma, percebe-se que a valorização da ‘autonomia médica’, sem considerar os saberes/fazeres dos pacientes e, tampouco, os achados científicos, pode promover equívocos e ferir princípios do fazer médico. Foto: Anna Shvets/Pexels Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion`Convidadoapplication/pdfhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/56810.1590/1981-7746-ojs568Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 20 (2022); 71981-7746reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/568/189Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venânciohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Isaac Linhares de Matias Aidan Cunha de SousaGuedes, Karlla Dannielle da Silva Silva, Nara Raquel Barbosa da Sampaio, Juliana 2023-01-13T13:39:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/568Revistahttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tesPUBhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/oairevtes@fiocruz.br1981-77461678-1007opendoar:2024-03-06T13:00:46.778774Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic “El médico brasileño sabe cómo tratar el Covid-19”: sentidos de la autonomía médica en la pandemia “O médico brasileiro sabe como tratar a Covid-19”: sentidos de autonomia médica na pandemia |
title |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
spellingShingle |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic Oliveira, Isaac Linhares de Autonomia Profissional Autonomia Pessoal Conselho de Saúde COVID-19 Medicina Professional Autonomy Personal Autonomy Health Councils COVID-19 Medicine Autonomía profesional Autonomía personal Consejo de salud Covid-19 Medicina |
title_short |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
title_full |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
title_fullStr |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
title_sort |
“The Brazilian doctor knows how to treat COVID-19”: meanings of medical autonomy in the pandemic |
author |
Oliveira, Isaac Linhares de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Isaac Linhares de Matias Aidan Cunha de Sousa Guedes, Karlla Dannielle da Silva Silva, Nara Raquel Barbosa da Sampaio, Juliana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matias Aidan Cunha de Sousa Guedes, Karlla Dannielle da Silva Silva, Nara Raquel Barbosa da Sampaio, Juliana |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Isaac Linhares de Matias Aidan Cunha de Sousa Guedes, Karlla Dannielle da Silva Silva, Nara Raquel Barbosa da Sampaio, Juliana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autonomia Profissional Autonomia Pessoal Conselho de Saúde COVID-19 Medicina Professional Autonomy Personal Autonomy Health Councils COVID-19 Medicine Autonomía profesional Autonomía personal Consejo de salud Covid-19 Medicina |
topic |
Autonomia Profissional Autonomia Pessoal Conselho de Saúde COVID-19 Medicina Professional Autonomy Personal Autonomy Health Councils COVID-19 Medicine Autonomía profesional Autonomía personal Consejo de salud Covid-19 Medicina |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic began in Brazil in March 2020. Since then, there have been several disagreements and disputes between health professionals, researchers and regulatory bodies about prescribed treatments for this infection. Given this scenario, this note proposes to discuss medical autonomy in the described context, based on official documents of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine, produced between 2020 and 2021, considering the mentioned therapeutic possibilities. As a result, three official documents were obtained that show that the only form of ‘autonomy’ is ‘medical autonomy’, while the ‘patient autonomy’ is not evidenced in terms of the adoption of therapies. We did not observe discussions in the documents about the bioethical principle of non- aleficence and that of autonomy itself. In this way, it can be seen that the appreciation of ‘medical autonomy’, without considering the knowledge/doings of patients, nor the scientific findings, can promote misunderstandings and harm the principles of medical practice. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion `Convidado |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/568 10.1590/1981-7746-ojs568 |
url |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/568 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-7746-ojs568 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/568/189 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 20 (2022); 7 1981-7746 reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
collection |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revtes@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943468341428224 |