Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1586 |
Resumo: | In this article, we analyze pieces published by the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper, in 2005, about assisted reproduction (in vitro fertilization and other techniques). The analysis is done from two angles. First, we examine what information is disclosed to the public about assisted reproduction, focusing on reproductive rights, on public and private access to assisted reproduction technologies, the interests involved, and the risks of these technologies. We found that there was no discussion regarding the laws that guarantee free access to assisted reproduction in Brazil, despite the approval, that year, of the National Policy on Sexual and Reproductive Rights. The reports emphasize the private nature of access to reproductive technologies and confront the commercial interests involved. They highlight the technological progress that has been made, such as universal benefits, but do not discuss how social inequalities affect access to these technologies and treatments. In the sparse reference to the risks associated with the procedures, they highlight multiple pregnancies which, paradoxically, affect poorer couples. Secondly, we questioned what kind of non-formal education is provided through the newspaper articles on assisted reproduction. The articles that were reviewed play both the role of disseminating the issue scientifically and the more traditional role the media play as opinion makers. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-2_dc7068e4308d02c0e2fb312432a8f698 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1586 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-2 |
network_name_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaperEducação não-formal sobre reprodução assistida: divulgação científica na Folha de S.Paulodivulgação científicaformação de opiniãoeducação não-formalreprodução assistidadireitos reprodutivosscientific disseminationopinion makingnon-formal educationassisted reproductionreproductive rightsIn this article, we analyze pieces published by the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper, in 2005, about assisted reproduction (in vitro fertilization and other techniques). The analysis is done from two angles. First, we examine what information is disclosed to the public about assisted reproduction, focusing on reproductive rights, on public and private access to assisted reproduction technologies, the interests involved, and the risks of these technologies. We found that there was no discussion regarding the laws that guarantee free access to assisted reproduction in Brazil, despite the approval, that year, of the National Policy on Sexual and Reproductive Rights. The reports emphasize the private nature of access to reproductive technologies and confront the commercial interests involved. They highlight the technological progress that has been made, such as universal benefits, but do not discuss how social inequalities affect access to these technologies and treatments. In the sparse reference to the risks associated with the procedures, they highlight multiple pregnancies which, paradoxically, affect poorer couples. Secondly, we questioned what kind of non-formal education is provided through the newspaper articles on assisted reproduction. The articles that were reviewed play both the role of disseminating the issue scientifically and the more traditional role the media play as opinion makers.Neste artigo, analisamos as matérias publicadas pelo jornal Folha de S.Paulo, no ano de 2005, sobre reprodução assistida (fertilização in vitro e outras técnicas). A análise é feita sob dois ângulos. Primeiramente, examinamos que informação é divulgada ao público sobre reprodução assistida, tendo como foco os direitos reprodutivos, o acesso público e privado às tecnologias de reprodução assistida, os interesses envolvidos e os riscos dessas tecnologias. Constatamos que não houve divulgação das leis que garantem acesso gratuito à reprodução assistida no Brasil, apesar da aprovação, naquele ano, da Política Nacional de Direitos Sexuais e Reprodutivos. As reportagens enfatizam o caráter privado do acesso às tecnologias reprodutivas e confrontam interesses comerciais envolvidos. Destacam os avanços tecnológicos como benefícios universais, sem discutir como as desigualdades sociais afetam o acesso a essas tecnologias e tratamentos. Na escassa referência aos riscos relacionados com os procedimentos, destacam a gravidez múltipla, que afeta, paradoxalmente, os casais mais pobres. Em segundo lugar, indagamos que tipo de educação não-formal é desenvolvido através dos artigos do jornal sobre reprodução assistida. Os artigos examinados mostram, ao mesmo tempo, características de divulgação científica e do mais tradicional papel desenvolvido pela mídia como formadora de opinião.Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/158610.1590/S1981-77462010000300009 Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 8 n. 3 (2010)1981-7746reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1586/720Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venânciohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKörbes, Clecí Invernizzi, Noela 2022-09-01T17:57:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1586Revistahttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tesPUBhttps://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/oairevtes@fiocruz.br1981-77461678-1007opendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:36.089153Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper Educação não-formal sobre reprodução assistida: divulgação científica na Folha de S.Paulo |
title |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
spellingShingle |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper Körbes, Clecí divulgação científica formação de opinião educação não-formal reprodução assistida direitos reprodutivos scientific dissemination opinion making non-formal education assisted reproduction reproductive rights |
title_short |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
title_full |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
title_fullStr |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
title_sort |
Non-formal education on assisted reproduction: scientific divulging in the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper |
author |
Körbes, Clecí |
author_facet |
Körbes, Clecí Invernizzi, Noela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Invernizzi, Noela |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Körbes, Clecí Invernizzi, Noela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
divulgação científica formação de opinião educação não-formal reprodução assistida direitos reprodutivos scientific dissemination opinion making non-formal education assisted reproduction reproductive rights |
topic |
divulgação científica formação de opinião educação não-formal reprodução assistida direitos reprodutivos scientific dissemination opinion making non-formal education assisted reproduction reproductive rights |
description |
In this article, we analyze pieces published by the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper, in 2005, about assisted reproduction (in vitro fertilization and other techniques). The analysis is done from two angles. First, we examine what information is disclosed to the public about assisted reproduction, focusing on reproductive rights, on public and private access to assisted reproduction technologies, the interests involved, and the risks of these technologies. We found that there was no discussion regarding the laws that guarantee free access to assisted reproduction in Brazil, despite the approval, that year, of the National Policy on Sexual and Reproductive Rights. The reports emphasize the private nature of access to reproductive technologies and confront the commercial interests involved. They highlight the technological progress that has been made, such as universal benefits, but do not discuss how social inequalities affect access to these technologies and treatments. In the sparse reference to the risks associated with the procedures, they highlight multiple pregnancies which, paradoxically, affect poorer couples. Secondly, we questioned what kind of non-formal education is provided through the newspaper articles on assisted reproduction. The articles that were reviewed play both the role of disseminating the issue scientifically and the more traditional role the media play as opinion makers. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1586 10.1590/S1981-77462010000300009 |
url |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1586 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1981-77462010000300009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.tes.epsjv.fiocruz.br/index.php/tes/article/view/1586/720 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde; v. 8 n. 3 (2010) 1981-7746 reponame:Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
collection |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revtes@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943473026465792 |