The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rabaioli Corbari Nardi, Mariane
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cerqueira de Souza, Vinícius, Campos Marques, Pedro, Blau Brasil, Andréia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/568
Resumo: Objective: the present study seeks to examine the confrontation carried out by the Superior Court in the matter related to health and in the course of analyzing the existence of beacons related to the enforcement of judicial blockades in the subjects pending judgment. Methods: the deductive method was used to analyze the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the matter of judicial blockages in the face of the Public Power in health claims. Results: the matter of the judicialization of health finds transit with the Federal Supreme Court in multiple aspects. The current debate, embodied in Themes 6, 500 and 793, derives from the trajectory inaugurated with Public Hearing No. 4 and goes through the content of the STA No.175 decision. With regard to the core of effective judicial blockages in health demands, Binding Precedent Proposal No. 4 represented the search for stabilization of the subject. Conclusion: despite the broad and current debate in the Federal Supreme Court regarding the judicialization of health, the central analysis of the study leads to the verification of a reduced confrontation of the issue with regard to judicial blockages and the absence of the Court's determination of objective criteria to establish contours for judicial action in specific cases.
id FIOCRUZ-3_5bfce684b08600362a643a1db5a7b94c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/568
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-3
network_name_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organizationEl Tribunal Supremo Federal y los bloqueos judiciales en las acciones de salud: una perspectiva crítica y la necesidad de organizar el sistemaO Supremo Tribunal Federal e os bloqueios judiciais nas ações de saúde: perspectiva crítica e a necessidade de organização do sistemaUnified Health System. Judicialization of health. Jurisprudence. Judicial power.Sistema Único de Salud. Judicialización de la salud. Jurisprudencia Poder Judicial.Sistema Único de Saúde. Judicialização da saúde. Jurisprudência. Poder Judiciário.Objective: the present study seeks to examine the confrontation carried out by the Superior Court in the matter related to health and in the course of analyzing the existence of beacons related to the enforcement of judicial blockades in the subjects pending judgment. Methods: the deductive method was used to analyze the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the matter of judicial blockages in the face of the Public Power in health claims. Results: the matter of the judicialization of health finds transit with the Federal Supreme Court in multiple aspects. The current debate, embodied in Themes 6, 500 and 793, derives from the trajectory inaugurated with Public Hearing No. 4 and goes through the content of the STA No.175 decision. With regard to the core of effective judicial blockages in health demands, Binding Precedent Proposal No. 4 represented the search for stabilization of the subject. Conclusion: despite the broad and current debate in the Federal Supreme Court regarding the judicialization of health, the central analysis of the study leads to the verification of a reduced confrontation of the issue with regard to judicial blockages and the absence of the Court's determination of objective criteria to establish contours for judicial action in specific cases.Objetivo: El presente estudio busca examinar la confrontación llevada a cabo por el Tribunal Superior en materia de salud y en el análisis de la existencia de balizas relacionadas con la ejecución de bloqueos judiciales en los sujetos pendientes de juicio. Métodos: El método deductivo se utilizó para analizar las decisiones de la Corte Suprema Federal sobre el tema de los bloqueos judiciales frente al Poder Público en los reclamos de salud. Resultados: La cuestión de la judicialización de la salud encuentra tránsito con la Corte Suprema Federal en múltiples aspectos. El debate actual, plasmado en los Temas 6, 500 y 793, deriva de la trayectoria inaugurada con la Audiencia Pública No. 4 y va más allá del contenido de la decisión STA No. 175. La Propuesta precedente vinculante No. 4 representaba la búsqueda de la estabilización del tema. Conclusión: a pesar del amplio y actual debate en la Corte Suprema Federal sobre la judicialización de la salud, el análisis central del estudio lleva a la verificación de una confrontación reducida del tema con respecto a los bloqueos judiciales y la ausencia de la determinación de criterios objetivos por parte de la Corte para establecer contornos para acciones judiciales en casos específicos.Objetivo: o presente estudo busca examinar o enfrentamento realizado pela Corte Superior na matéria relativa à saúde e, no transcurso, analisar a existência de balizas relativas à efetivação de bloqueios judiciais nos temas pendentes de julgamento. Métodos: fez-se uso do método dedutivo para analisar as decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal relativo à matéria dos bloqueios judiciais em face do Poder Público nas demandas de saúde. Resultados: a matéria da judicialização da saúde encontra trânsito junto ao Supremo Tribunal Federal em múltiplos aspectos. O debate atual, consubstanciado nos Temas 6, 500 e 793, deriva de trajetória inaugurada com a Audiência Pública nº 4 e transpassa pelo teor da decisão da STA nº 175. No que se refere ao cerne da efetivação de bloqueios judiciais nas demandas de saúde, a Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 4 representou a busca pela estabilização do assunto. Conclusão: a despeito do amplo e atual debate no Supremo Tribunal Federal quanto à judicialização da saúde, a análise central do estudo conduz à verificação de reduzido enfrentamento do tema no que se refere aos bloqueios judiciais e à ausência de fixação pela Corte de critérios objetivos passíveis de estabelecer contornos para a atuação jurisdicional nos casos concretos.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2019-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa bibliográfica e documentalapplication/pdfhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/56810.17566/ciads.v8i4.568Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-118Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-118Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 8 n. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-1182358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v8i4reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/568/622Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRabaioli Corbari Nardi, MarianeCerqueira de Souza, ViníciusCampos Marques, PedroBlau Brasil, Andréia2020-01-23T15:25:26Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/568Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2020-01-23T15:25:26Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
El Tribunal Supremo Federal y los bloqueos judiciales en las acciones de salud: una perspectiva crítica y la necesidad de organizar el sistema
O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os bloqueios judiciais nas ações de saúde: perspectiva crítica e a necessidade de organização do sistema
title The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
spellingShingle The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
Rabaioli Corbari Nardi, Mariane
Unified Health System. Judicialization of health. Jurisprudence. Judicial power.
Sistema Único de Salud. Judicialización de la salud. Jurisprudencia Poder Judicial.
Sistema Único de Saúde. Judicialização da saúde. Jurisprudência. Poder Judiciário.
title_short The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
title_full The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
title_fullStr The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
title_full_unstemmed The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
title_sort The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization
author Rabaioli Corbari Nardi, Mariane
author_facet Rabaioli Corbari Nardi, Mariane
Cerqueira de Souza, Vinícius
Campos Marques, Pedro
Blau Brasil, Andréia
author_role author
author2 Cerqueira de Souza, Vinícius
Campos Marques, Pedro
Blau Brasil, Andréia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rabaioli Corbari Nardi, Mariane
Cerqueira de Souza, Vinícius
Campos Marques, Pedro
Blau Brasil, Andréia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Unified Health System. Judicialization of health. Jurisprudence. Judicial power.
Sistema Único de Salud. Judicialización de la salud. Jurisprudencia Poder Judicial.
Sistema Único de Saúde. Judicialização da saúde. Jurisprudência. Poder Judiciário.
topic Unified Health System. Judicialization of health. Jurisprudence. Judicial power.
Sistema Único de Salud. Judicialización de la salud. Jurisprudencia Poder Judicial.
Sistema Único de Saúde. Judicialização da saúde. Jurisprudência. Poder Judiciário.
description Objective: the present study seeks to examine the confrontation carried out by the Superior Court in the matter related to health and in the course of analyzing the existence of beacons related to the enforcement of judicial blockades in the subjects pending judgment. Methods: the deductive method was used to analyze the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the matter of judicial blockages in the face of the Public Power in health claims. Results: the matter of the judicialization of health finds transit with the Federal Supreme Court in multiple aspects. The current debate, embodied in Themes 6, 500 and 793, derives from the trajectory inaugurated with Public Hearing No. 4 and goes through the content of the STA No.175 decision. With regard to the core of effective judicial blockages in health demands, Binding Precedent Proposal No. 4 represented the search for stabilization of the subject. Conclusion: despite the broad and current debate in the Federal Supreme Court regarding the judicialization of health, the central analysis of the study leads to the verification of a reduced confrontation of the issue with regard to judicial blockages and the absence of the Court's determination of objective criteria to establish contours for judicial action in specific cases.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa bibliográfica e documental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/568
10.17566/ciads.v8i4.568
url https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/568
identifier_str_mv 10.17566/ciads.v8i4.568
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/568/622
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-118
Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-118
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 8 n. 4 (2019): (OUT./DEZ. 2019); 103-118
2358-1824
2317-8396
10.17566/ciads.v8i4
reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798942494928404480