Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cordeiro, Michelle Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477
Resumo: Objective: To analyze the speeches of the procedural actors in lawsuits in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories in which they prosecute actions in detriment of the public health policies, in the period between 2012 and 2013, in order to know the arguments most commonly used for the judgment of these actions. Methodology: A descriptive, analytical, documentary and bibliographic research was carried out using secondary data. The data were collected through a research on judicialization in Brazil in the years of 2012 and 2013. The quantitative data available were already treated in tables and graphs and the qualitative data were made available without due treatment, which was done from the method of Idiosyncratic Analysis. Results: The three actors analyzed author, defendant and judge, deal with logical issues that occur in the system and that discrepancies may occur. Each author has his or her points of view and experience and their particularities that should not be discarded, so that there may be visible conflicts, but if it comes to health, the common ground, is the best decision for the user. The requests to be judicialized do not directly correspond to the diseases that most affect the patients. Conclusion: It is possible to gauge from the discourses the imprudence with the patients that are in the process and it is perceived that many of the services rendered are still in deficit with their care, being that the Brazilian state is not yet universal guarantor of the users in your needs.
id FIOCRUZ-3_c6be7d58b1b3e930ee254b0f485df65a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/477
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-3
network_name_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actorsJudicialización de la Salud: argumentos utilizados en las acciones judiciales en desfavor del SUS, en el Tribunal de Justicia del Distrito Federal y Territorios, por los actores procesalesJudicialização da Saúde: argumentos utilizados nas ações judiciais em desfavor do Sistema Único de Saúde, no Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios, pelos atores processuais.Health's Judicialization. Right to HealthUnified Health SystemPublic HealthJudicialización de la Salud. Derecho a la SaludSistema Único de SaludSalud PúblicaJudicialização da Saúde. Direito à SaúdeSistema Único de SaúdeSaúde PúblicaObjective: To analyze the speeches of the procedural actors in lawsuits in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories in which they prosecute actions in detriment of the public health policies, in the period between 2012 and 2013, in order to know the arguments most commonly used for the judgment of these actions. Methodology: A descriptive, analytical, documentary and bibliographic research was carried out using secondary data. The data were collected through a research on judicialization in Brazil in the years of 2012 and 2013. The quantitative data available were already treated in tables and graphs and the qualitative data were made available without due treatment, which was done from the method of Idiosyncratic Analysis. Results: The three actors analyzed author, defendant and judge, deal with logical issues that occur in the system and that discrepancies may occur. Each author has his or her points of view and experience and their particularities that should not be discarded, so that there may be visible conflicts, but if it comes to health, the common ground, is the best decision for the user. The requests to be judicialized do not directly correspond to the diseases that most affect the patients. Conclusion: It is possible to gauge from the discourses the imprudence with the patients that are in the process and it is perceived that many of the services rendered are still in deficit with their care, being that the Brazilian state is not yet universal guarantor of the users in your needs.Objetivo: Analizar los discursos de los actores procesales en procesos ante el Tribunal de Justicia del Distrito Federal y de los Territorios en que tramitan acciones en desfavorable de las políticas públicas de salud, en el período entre los años 2012 y 2013, a fin de conocer los argumentos más comúnmente utilizados para el juicio de estas acciones. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación descriptiva, analítica, de base documental y bibliográfica, utilizando datos secundarios. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de una encuesta sobre judicialización en Brasil, en los años 2012 y 2013. Los datos cuantitativos disponibles ya se encontraban tratados en tablas y gráficos y los datos cualitativos fueron disponibilizados sin el debido tratamiento, lo que fue realizado a partir del día el método del análisis idiosincrásico.  Resultados: Los tres actores analizados autor, reo y juez, tratan de cuestiones lógicas que ocurren en el sistema y que pueden ocurrir discrepancias, cada autor tiene sus puntos de vista y experiencia y sus particularidades que no deben ser descartadas, pudiendo así existir conflictos visibles, pero si se trata de la salud, el punto en común, es la mejor decisión para el usuario. Los pedidos a ser judicializados no concaten directamente con las enfermedades que más afectan a los pacientes. Conclusión: Es posible aferir a partir de los discursos la imprudencia acometida con los pacientes que están en el proceso y se percibe que muchas de las prestaciones de servicios buscadas, aún están en déficit con su atención, siendo que el estado brasileño aún no es garante universal de los usuarios en sus necesidades.Objetivo: Analisar os discursos dos atores processuais em processos no Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios em que tramitam ações em desfavor das políticas públicas de saúde, no período entre os anos de 2012 e 2013, a fim de conhecer os argumentos mais comumente utilizados para o julgamento dessas ações. Metodologia: Realizou-se uma pesquisa descritiva, analítica, de base documental e bibliográfica, utilizando dados secundários. Os dados foram coletados através de uma pesquisa sobre judicialização no Brasil, nos anos de 2012 e 2013. Os dados quantitativos disponibilizados já se encontravam tratados em tabelas e gráficos e os dados qualitativos foram disponibilizados sem o devido tratamento, o que foi realizado a partir do método da Análise Idiossincrática. Resultados: Os três atores analisados autor, réu e juiz, tratam de questões lógicas que ocorrem no sistema e que podem ocorrer discrepâncias. Cada autor tem o seu ponto de vista, experiência e suas particularidades que não devem ser descartadas, podendo assim, haver conflitos visíveis, mas, em tratando de saúde, o ponto em comum é a melhor decisão para o usuário. Os pedidos a serem judicializados não condizem diretamente com as doenças que mais acometem os pacientes.  Conclusão: É possível aferir, a partir dos discursos, a imprudência acometida com os pacientes que estão no processo e percebe-se que muitas das prestações de serviços procuradas ainda estão em déficit com seu atendimento, sendo que o estado brasileiro ainda não é garantidor universal dos usuários em suas necessidades.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2018-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/47710.17566/ciads.v7i2.477Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-28Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-28Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 7 n. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-282358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v7i2reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477/534https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477/69010.17566/ciads.v7i2.477.s118Copyright (c) 2018 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCordeiro, Michelle Ferreira2020-03-24T20:30:56Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/477Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2020-03-24T20:30:56Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
Judicialización de la Salud: argumentos utilizados en las acciones judiciales en desfavor del SUS, en el Tribunal de Justicia del Distrito Federal y Territorios, por los actores procesales
Judicialização da Saúde: argumentos utilizados nas ações judiciais em desfavor do Sistema Único de Saúde, no Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios, pelos atores processuais.
title Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
spellingShingle Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
Cordeiro, Michelle Ferreira
Health's Judicialization. Right to Health
Unified Health System
Public Health
Judicialización de la Salud. Derecho a la Salud
Sistema Único de Salud
Salud Pública
Judicialização da Saúde. Direito à Saúde
Sistema Único de Saúde
Saúde Pública
title_short Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
title_full Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
title_fullStr Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
title_full_unstemmed Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
title_sort Judicialization of Health: arguments used in the lawsuits against the SUS, in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories, by the procedural actors
author Cordeiro, Michelle Ferreira
author_facet Cordeiro, Michelle Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cordeiro, Michelle Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health's Judicialization. Right to Health
Unified Health System
Public Health
Judicialización de la Salud. Derecho a la Salud
Sistema Único de Salud
Salud Pública
Judicialização da Saúde. Direito à Saúde
Sistema Único de Saúde
Saúde Pública
topic Health's Judicialization. Right to Health
Unified Health System
Public Health
Judicialización de la Salud. Derecho a la Salud
Sistema Único de Salud
Salud Pública
Judicialização da Saúde. Direito à Saúde
Sistema Único de Saúde
Saúde Pública
description Objective: To analyze the speeches of the procedural actors in lawsuits in the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories in which they prosecute actions in detriment of the public health policies, in the period between 2012 and 2013, in order to know the arguments most commonly used for the judgment of these actions. Methodology: A descriptive, analytical, documentary and bibliographic research was carried out using secondary data. The data were collected through a research on judicialization in Brazil in the years of 2012 and 2013. The quantitative data available were already treated in tables and graphs and the qualitative data were made available without due treatment, which was done from the method of Idiosyncratic Analysis. Results: The three actors analyzed author, defendant and judge, deal with logical issues that occur in the system and that discrepancies may occur. Each author has his or her points of view and experience and their particularities that should not be discarded, so that there may be visible conflicts, but if it comes to health, the common ground, is the best decision for the user. The requests to be judicialized do not directly correspond to the diseases that most affect the patients. Conclusion: It is possible to gauge from the discourses the imprudence with the patients that are in the process and it is perceived that many of the services rendered are still in deficit with their care, being that the Brazilian state is not yet universal guarantor of the users in your needs.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477
10.17566/ciads.v7i2.477
url https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477
identifier_str_mv 10.17566/ciads.v7i2.477
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477/534
https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/477/690
10.17566/ciads.v7i2.477.s118
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-28
Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-28
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 7 n. 2 (2018): (ABR/JUN.2018); 11-28
2358-1824
2317-8396
10.17566/ciads.v7i2
reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798942494745952256

Registros relacionados