Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz |
Texto Completo: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762009000800022 |
Resumo: | A group of 18 research workers involved in different aspects of the biology of Lutzomyia longipalpis discussed whether or not it is important to give taxonomically valid names to populations that have been defined by biological, biochemical and molecular methods to be reproductively isolated. The type material of this medically important species has been lost and because of this it was recommended that a colony should be established from insects captured in the region of the type area and that their description should serve as the basis for future descriptions. It was pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity in the naming of closely related American sand flies and that some of the differences between populations of Lu. longipalpis are greater than those between accepted species. The majority of the participants agreed that the populations that have been defined in the literature as sibling species should be named. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-4_7c057d6ad39c624a729f07cf69601f5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0074-02762009000800022 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-4 |
network_name_str |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz |
spelling |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names?A group of 18 research workers involved in different aspects of the biology of Lutzomyia longipalpis discussed whether or not it is important to give taxonomically valid names to populations that have been defined by biological, biochemical and molecular methods to be reproductively isolated. The type material of this medically important species has been lost and because of this it was recommended that a colony should be established from insects captured in the region of the type area and that their description should serve as the basis for future descriptions. It was pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity in the naming of closely related American sand flies and that some of the differences between populations of Lu. longipalpis are greater than those between accepted species. The majority of the participants agreed that the populations that have been defined in the literature as sibling species should be named.Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762009000800022Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz v.104 n.8 2009reponame:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruzinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruzinstacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/S0074-02762009000800022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandão-Filho,Sinval PBalbino,Valdir QMarcondes,Carlos BBrazil,Reginaldo PHamilton,James GShaw,Jeffrey Jeng2020-04-25T17:50:36Zhttp://www.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php0074-02761678-8060opendoar:null2020-04-26 02:16:35.718Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fundação Oswaldo Cruztrue |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
title |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
spellingShingle |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? Brandão-Filho,Sinval P |
title_short |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
title_full |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
title_fullStr |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
title_sort |
Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names? |
author |
Brandão-Filho,Sinval P |
author_facet |
Brandão-Filho,Sinval P Balbino,Valdir Q Marcondes,Carlos B Brazil,Reginaldo P Hamilton,James G Shaw,Jeffrey J |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Balbino,Valdir Q Marcondes,Carlos B Brazil,Reginaldo P Hamilton,James G Shaw,Jeffrey J |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brandão-Filho,Sinval P Balbino,Valdir Q Marcondes,Carlos B Brazil,Reginaldo P Hamilton,James G Shaw,Jeffrey J |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
A group of 18 research workers involved in different aspects of the biology of Lutzomyia longipalpis discussed whether or not it is important to give taxonomically valid names to populations that have been defined by biological, biochemical and molecular methods to be reproductively isolated. The type material of this medically important species has been lost and because of this it was recommended that a colony should be established from insects captured in the region of the type area and that their description should serve as the basis for future descriptions. It was pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity in the naming of closely related American sand flies and that some of the differences between populations of Lu. longipalpis are greater than those between accepted species. The majority of the participants agreed that the populations that have been defined in the literature as sibling species should be named. |
description |
A group of 18 research workers involved in different aspects of the biology of Lutzomyia longipalpis discussed whether or not it is important to give taxonomically valid names to populations that have been defined by biological, biochemical and molecular methods to be reproductively isolated. The type material of this medically important species has been lost and because of this it was recommended that a colony should be established from insects captured in the region of the type area and that their description should serve as the basis for future descriptions. It was pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity in the naming of closely related American sand flies and that some of the differences between populations of Lu. longipalpis are greater than those between accepted species. The majority of the participants agreed that the populations that have been defined in the literature as sibling species should be named. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762009000800022 |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762009000800022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0074-02762009000800022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz v.104 n.8 2009 reponame:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz instacron:FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz |
collection |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1669937706786881536 |