Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dode, Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Santos, Iná S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940
Resumo: Studies based on self-reporting of risk factors or morbidity are useful in public health, due mainly to the low cost and ease of data collection, but the accuracy of the resulting data is important for the internal validity of the research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus and prenatal care medical records (gold standard). Agreement was measured by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, kappa statistic, and confidence intervals (95%CI). From July to December 2007, all the women who gave birth in three maternity hospitals in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were visited in the immediate postpartum. 1,047 women were interviewed, of whom 872 were in possession of their prenatal care card; of these, 869 had their blood glucose recorded on the card. Mean age was 26.7 years. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on the gold standard was 4.3% (95%CI: 3.0-5.8), while the self-reported rate was 4% (95%CI: 2.8-5.5). Sensitivity of self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus was 72.9% (95%CI: 55.9-86.2); specificity was 99% (95%CI: 98.1-99.6); accuracy 97.9% (95%CI: 96.7-98.7); kappa 74%. For this population, self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus is valid information and can be used in population-based studies.
id FIOCRUZ-5_002e5f28d35a20ed3e44384b5ed2fdbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3940
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediatoDiabetes GestacionalBem-Estar MaternoPrevalênciaStudies based on self-reporting of risk factors or morbidity are useful in public health, due mainly to the low cost and ease of data collection, but the accuracy of the resulting data is important for the internal validity of the research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus and prenatal care medical records (gold standard). Agreement was measured by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, kappa statistic, and confidence intervals (95%CI). From July to December 2007, all the women who gave birth in three maternity hospitals in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were visited in the immediate postpartum. 1,047 women were interviewed, of whom 872 were in possession of their prenatal care card; of these, 869 had their blood glucose recorded on the card. Mean age was 26.7 years. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on the gold standard was 4.3% (95%CI: 3.0-5.8), while the self-reported rate was 4% (95%CI: 2.8-5.5). Sensitivity of self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus was 72.9% (95%CI: 55.9-86.2); specificity was 99% (95%CI: 98.1-99.6); accuracy 97.9% (95%CI: 96.7-98.7); kappa 74%. For this population, self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus is valid information and can be used in population-based studies.Pesquisas com base no auto-relato de fatores de risco ou morbidade são úteis em saúde pública, principalmente pelo baixo custo e facilidade de coleta, no entanto a acurácia dos dados coletados é importante para a validade interna da investigação. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a concordância entre o auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional e registros do cartão da gestante (padrão-ouro). A concordância foi medida por meio da sensibilidade, especificidade, acurácia, estatística kappa e intervalos de 95% de confiança (IC95%). De julho a dezembro de 2007, todas as mulheres que tiveram filhos em três maternidades de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, foram visitadas no pós-parto imediato. Entrevistaram-se 1.047 mulheres, das quais 872 portavam a carteira de gestante; destas, 869 possuíam registro de glicemia. A média de idade foi 26,7 anos. A prevalência de diabetes mellitus gestacional conforme padrão-ouro foi 4,3% (IC95%: 3,0-5,8) e auto-referida, 4% (IC95%: 2,8-5,5). A sensibilidade do auto-relato de diabetes mellitus gestacional foi 72,9% (IC95%: 55,9-86,2); especificidade, 99% (IC95%: 98,1-99,6); acurácia, 97,9% (IC95%: 96,7-98,7); kappa, 74%. Para esta população, auto-relato de diabetes mellitus gestacional é uma informação válida e pode ser usada em estudos de base populacional.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2009-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940Reports in Public Health; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2009): FebruaryCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 25 n. 2 (2009): Fevereiro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940/8001https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940/8002Dode, Maria Alice Souza de OliveiraSantos, Iná S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:27:54Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3940Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:04:31.510378Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
title Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
spellingShingle Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
Dode, Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira
Diabetes Gestacional
Bem-Estar Materno
Prevalência
title_short Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
title_full Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
title_fullStr Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
title_full_unstemmed Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
title_sort Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato
author Dode, Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira
author_facet Dode, Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira
Santos, Iná S.
author_role author
author2 Santos, Iná S.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dode, Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira
Santos, Iná S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes Gestacional
Bem-Estar Materno
Prevalência
topic Diabetes Gestacional
Bem-Estar Materno
Prevalência
description Studies based on self-reporting of risk factors or morbidity are useful in public health, due mainly to the low cost and ease of data collection, but the accuracy of the resulting data is important for the internal validity of the research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus and prenatal care medical records (gold standard). Agreement was measured by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, kappa statistic, and confidence intervals (95%CI). From July to December 2007, all the women who gave birth in three maternity hospitals in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were visited in the immediate postpartum. 1,047 women were interviewed, of whom 872 were in possession of their prenatal care card; of these, 869 had their blood glucose recorded on the card. Mean age was 26.7 years. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on the gold standard was 4.3% (95%CI: 3.0-5.8), while the self-reported rate was 4% (95%CI: 2.8-5.5). Sensitivity of self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus was 72.9% (95%CI: 55.9-86.2); specificity was 99% (95%CI: 98.1-99.6); accuracy 97.9% (95%CI: 96.7-98.7); kappa 74%. For this population, self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus is valid information and can be used in population-based studies.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940/8001
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3940/8002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2009): February
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 25 n. 2 (2009): Fevereiro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1816705359938584576