Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Renato Santos de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Stephane Bourliataux-Lajoinie, Mônica Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879
Resumo: Patient satisfaction surveys can be an interesting way to improve quality and discuss the concept of patient-centered care. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the validated patient satisfaction measurement instruments applied in healthcare. The systematic review searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. The search strategy used the terms: "Patient Satisfaction" AND "Patient centered care" AND "Healthcare survey OR Satisfaction questionnaire" AND "Psychometric properties". 37 studies were included and almost all studies showed that satisfaction is a multidimensional construct. In these studies, 34 different instruments were used and most surveys contained the dimension patient-healthcare professional interactions, physical environment and management process. The COSMIN score for methodological quality showed that most of them scored a good or fair average. We can conclude that there is not a gold standard instrument for patient satisfaction assessment but some dimensions are essential for this construct.
id FIOCRUZ-5_023c793580a84c961f3986969c5b1424
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5879
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic reviewQuality of Health CarePatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPsychometricsPatient satisfaction surveys can be an interesting way to improve quality and discuss the concept of patient-centered care. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the validated patient satisfaction measurement instruments applied in healthcare. The systematic review searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. The search strategy used the terms: "Patient Satisfaction" AND "Patient centered care" AND "Healthcare survey OR Satisfaction questionnaire" AND "Psychometric properties". 37 studies were included and almost all studies showed that satisfaction is a multidimensional construct. In these studies, 34 different instruments were used and most surveys contained the dimension patient-healthcare professional interactions, physical environment and management process. The COSMIN score for methodological quality showed that most of them scored a good or fair average. We can conclude that there is not a gold standard instrument for patient satisfaction assessment but some dimensions are essential for this construct.Los cuestionarios para la satisfacción del paciente pueden ser una buena opción de mejorar la calidad y discutir la atención centrada en el paciente. El objetivo era llevar a cabo una revisión sistemática, en relación con los instrumentos previamente validados para medir la satisfacción de los pacientes. La revisión sistemática realizó búsquedas en las bases de datos MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus y Web of Knowledge. La estrategia de búsqueda fue: "Patient Satisfaction" AND "Patient centered care" AND "Healthcare survey OR Satisfaction questionnaire" AND "Psychometric properties". Se incluyeron treinta y siete estudios y casi todos han demostrado que la satisfacción es multidimensional. Se encontraron 34 instrumentos y la mayoría contaba con las dimensiones: interacción paciente-profesional de la salud, entorno físico y procesos administrativos. La puntuación COSMIN en calidad metodológica indica que la mayoría de los estudios tiene un valor bueno o medio. No existe un estándar clave para la medición de la satisfacción del paciente, pero algunas dimensiones son esenciales para este constructo.Questionários para satisfação dos pacientes podem ser uma boa maneira para melhorar a qualidade e discutir aspectos do cuidado centrado no paciente. O objetivo foi conduzir uma revisão sistemática referente a instrumentos já validados para mensuração de satisfação de pacientes em serviços de saúde. A revisão sistemática realizou buscas nas bases MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. A estratégia de busca foi: "Patient Satisfaction" AND "Patient centered care" AND "Healthcare survey OR Satisfaction questionnaire" AND "Psychometric properties". Trinta e sete estudos foram incluídos e quase todos demonstraram que a satisfação é um construto multidimensional. Foram encontrados 34 diferentes instrumentos e a maioria deles possuía as dimensões paciente-profissional da saúde, ambiente físico e processos gerenciais. A pontuação COSMIN em qualidade metodológica dos artigos indicou que a maioria apresenta um valor bom ou médio neste aspecto. Não existe um padrão ouro para mensuração da satisfação do paciente, mas algumas dimensões são essenciais para este construto.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879Reports in Public Health; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015): JanuaryCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 31 n. 1 (2015): Janeiro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879/12309https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879/12310Renato Santos de AlmeidaStephane Bourliataux-LajoinieMônica Martinsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:28:58Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5879Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:06:43.884081Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
title Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
spellingShingle Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
Renato Santos de Almeida
Quality of Health Care
Patient-Centered Care
Patient Satisfaction
Psychometrics
title_short Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
title_full Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
title_fullStr Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
title_sort Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review
author Renato Santos de Almeida
author_facet Renato Santos de Almeida
Stephane Bourliataux-Lajoinie
Mônica Martins
author_role author
author2 Stephane Bourliataux-Lajoinie
Mônica Martins
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Renato Santos de Almeida
Stephane Bourliataux-Lajoinie
Mônica Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quality of Health Care
Patient-Centered Care
Patient Satisfaction
Psychometrics
topic Quality of Health Care
Patient-Centered Care
Patient Satisfaction
Psychometrics
description Patient satisfaction surveys can be an interesting way to improve quality and discuss the concept of patient-centered care. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the validated patient satisfaction measurement instruments applied in healthcare. The systematic review searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. The search strategy used the terms: "Patient Satisfaction" AND "Patient centered care" AND "Healthcare survey OR Satisfaction questionnaire" AND "Psychometric properties". 37 studies were included and almost all studies showed that satisfaction is a multidimensional construct. In these studies, 34 different instruments were used and most surveys contained the dimension patient-healthcare professional interactions, physical environment and management process. The COSMIN score for methodological quality showed that most of them scored a good or fair average. We can conclude that there is not a gold standard instrument for patient satisfaction assessment but some dimensions are essential for this construct.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879/12309
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5879/12310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015): January
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 31 n. 1 (2015): Janeiro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943379554304000