Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742 |
Resumo: | The aim was to analyze the level and characterize the use of clinical coordination mechanisms between levels of care, and their associated factors, in two public networks of health services in Mexico. A cross-sectional study was carried out using the COORDENA questionnaire to primary and specialized care physicians in the state of Veracruz. Differences were found between networks and levels of care, according to the mechanism. In both, the referral/counter-referral is mostly used to channel the patient to another level, mainly by primary care physicians. A high reception of referrals by specialists was identified, but few counterreferences in primary care. Being a man and recognizing the primary care physician, as responsible for monitoring the patient in his/her healthcare career, were factors associated with the frequent sending of the counter-referral by specialists. The discharge report is used in both networks to send clinical information to the other level, with more sending by specialist doctors, but with less reception in primary care. In both networks, the follow-up to the recommendations of the mechanisms to standardize clinical care was greater by primary care physicians than specialized ones. The use of coordination mechanisms between levels of care is deficient and limited, with greater use of mechanisms to transfer information than for clinical management. The need to implement strategies that consider the participation of professionals is evident, to favor local adaptation, appropriation and improve their use. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_247e5c4b93e9b9422850c6957367bcf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7742 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en MéxicoServicios de SaludAtención Primaria de SaludAdministración de los Servicios de SaludThe aim was to analyze the level and characterize the use of clinical coordination mechanisms between levels of care, and their associated factors, in two public networks of health services in Mexico. A cross-sectional study was carried out using the COORDENA questionnaire to primary and specialized care physicians in the state of Veracruz. Differences were found between networks and levels of care, according to the mechanism. In both, the referral/counter-referral is mostly used to channel the patient to another level, mainly by primary care physicians. A high reception of referrals by specialists was identified, but few counterreferences in primary care. Being a man and recognizing the primary care physician, as responsible for monitoring the patient in his/her healthcare career, were factors associated with the frequent sending of the counter-referral by specialists. The discharge report is used in both networks to send clinical information to the other level, with more sending by specialist doctors, but with less reception in primary care. In both networks, the follow-up to the recommendations of the mechanisms to standardize clinical care was greater by primary care physicians than specialized ones. The use of coordination mechanisms between levels of care is deficient and limited, with greater use of mechanisms to transfer information than for clinical management. The need to implement strategies that consider the participation of professionals is evident, to favor local adaptation, appropriation and improve their use.El objetivo fue analizar el nivel y caracterizar el uso de mecanismos de coordinación clínica entre niveles de atención, y sus factores asociados, en dos redes públicas de servicios de salud en México. Se realizó estudio transversal mediante el cuestionario COORDENA a médicos de atención primaria y especializada del estado de Veracruz. Se encontraron diferencias entre redes y niveles de atención, según el mecanismo. En ambas, la referencia/contrarreferencia es sobre todo utilizada para canalizar al paciente a otro nivel, principalmente por parte de los médicos de atención primaria. Se identificó una alta recepción de referencias por especialistas, pero escasa recepción de contrarreferencias en atención primaria. Ser hombre y reconocer al médico/a de atención primaria como responsable del seguimiento del paciente en su trayectoria asistencial, fueron factores asociados al envío frecuente de la contrarreferencia por especialistas. El informe de alta se utiliza en ambas redes para enviar información clínica al otro nivel, con mayor envío por médicos/as especialistas, y con menor recepción en atención primaria. En ambas redes, el seguimiento a las recomendaciones de los mecanismos para estandarizar la atención clínica (guías de práctica clínica, etc.) por parte médicos/as de atención primaria que de especializada. La utilización de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención es deficiente y limitada, con mayor uso de mecanismos para transferir información que para la gestión clínica. Se evidencia la necesidad de implementar estrategias que consideren la participación de los profesionales, para favorecer la adaptación local, apropiación y mejorar su uso.O objetivo era analisar o nível e caracterizar o uso de mecanismos de coordenação clínica entre níveis de atenção e seus fatores associados em duas redes públicas de saúde no México. Estudo transversal por meio do questionário COORDENA aplicados a médicos da atenção primaria e especializada do Estado de Veracruz. Foram encontradas diferenças entre redes e níveis de atenção conforme o mecanismo. Em ambas, a referência/contrarreferência é sobre tudo utilizada para encaminhar o paciente para outro nível, principalmente por parte dos médicos da atenção primária. Foi identificado um alto recebimento de referências por especialistas, porém raras são as contrarreferências na atenção primária. Ser homem e reconhecer o médico/a de atenção primária como responsável pelo acompanhamento do paciente na sua trajetória de atendimento foram fatores associados ao envio frequente da contrarreferência por especialistas. O relatório de alta é utilizado nas duas redes para enviar informação clínica ao outro nível, com mais envios por médicos/as especialistas e menos recebimentos na atenção primária. Em ambas as redes, a observância das recomendações de mecanismos para padronizar a atenção clínica foi maior por parte dos médicos/as da atenção primária do que da especializada. O uso de mecanismos de coordenação entre níveis de atenção é deficiente e limitado, com o emprego maior de mecanismos para transmitir informação do que para a gestão clínica. Ficou evidenciada a necessidade de implementar estratégias que levem em conta a participação dos profissionais, para promover a adequação local, a apropriação e melhorar a sua utilização.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2021-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742Reports in Public Health; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2021): AprilCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 37 n. 4 (2021): Abril1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742/17294https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742/17295Julieta López-VázquezDamián Eduardo Pérez-MartínezIngrid VargasMaría-Luisa Vázquezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:09Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7742Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:54.055982Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
title |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
spellingShingle |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México Julieta López-Vázquez Servicios de Salud Atención Primaria de Salud Administración de los Servicios de Salud |
title_short |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
title_full |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
title_fullStr |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
title_sort |
Barreras y factores asociados al uso de mecanismos de coordinación entre niveles de atención en México |
author |
Julieta López-Vázquez |
author_facet |
Julieta López-Vázquez Damián Eduardo Pérez-Martínez Ingrid Vargas María-Luisa Vázquez |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damián Eduardo Pérez-Martínez Ingrid Vargas María-Luisa Vázquez |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Julieta López-Vázquez Damián Eduardo Pérez-Martínez Ingrid Vargas María-Luisa Vázquez |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Servicios de Salud Atención Primaria de Salud Administración de los Servicios de Salud |
topic |
Servicios de Salud Atención Primaria de Salud Administración de los Servicios de Salud |
description |
The aim was to analyze the level and characterize the use of clinical coordination mechanisms between levels of care, and their associated factors, in two public networks of health services in Mexico. A cross-sectional study was carried out using the COORDENA questionnaire to primary and specialized care physicians in the state of Veracruz. Differences were found between networks and levels of care, according to the mechanism. In both, the referral/counter-referral is mostly used to channel the patient to another level, mainly by primary care physicians. A high reception of referrals by specialists was identified, but few counterreferences in primary care. Being a man and recognizing the primary care physician, as responsible for monitoring the patient in his/her healthcare career, were factors associated with the frequent sending of the counter-referral by specialists. The discharge report is used in both networks to send clinical information to the other level, with more sending by specialist doctors, but with less reception in primary care. In both networks, the follow-up to the recommendations of the mechanisms to standardize clinical care was greater by primary care physicians than specialized ones. The use of coordination mechanisms between levels of care is deficient and limited, with greater use of mechanisms to transfer information than for clinical management. The need to implement strategies that consider the participation of professionals is evident, to favor local adaptation, appropriation and improve their use. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742/17294 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7742/17295 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2021): April Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 37 n. 4 (2021): Abril 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943394686304256 |