Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maria do Carmo Leal
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Ana Paula Esteves Pereira, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Mariza Miranda Theme Filha, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Marcos Nakamura-Pereira, Maria Helena Bastos, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469
Resumo: This study evaluated the use of best practices (eating, movement, use of nonpharmacological methods for pain relief and partograph) and obstetric interventions in labor and delivery among low-risk women. Data from the hospital-based survey Birth in Brazil conducted between 2011 and 2012 was used. Best practices during labor occurred in less than 50% of women and prevalence of the use of these practices was lower in the North, Northeast and Central West Regions. The rate of use of oxytocin drips and amniotomy was 40%, and was higher among women admitted to public hospitals and in women with a low level of education. The uterine fundal pressure, episiotomy and lithotomy were used in 37%, 56% and 92% of women, respectively. Caesarean section rates were lower in women using the public health system, nonwhites, women with a low level of education and multiparous women. To improve the health of mothers and newborns and promote quality of life, a change of approach to labor and childbirth that focuses on evidence-based care is required in both the public and private health sectors.
id FIOCRUZ-5_249a66cc329d26e582c82e51911a9413
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5469
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk womenIntervenções obstétricas durante o trabalho de parto e parto em mulheres brasileiras de risco habitualPublic Health PracticeMaternal and Child HealthObstretic LaborParturitionPráticas de Saúde PúblicaSaúde Materno-InfantilTrabalho de PartoPartoThis study evaluated the use of best practices (eating, movement, use of nonpharmacological methods for pain relief and partograph) and obstetric interventions in labor and delivery among low-risk women. Data from the hospital-based survey Birth in Brazil conducted between 2011 and 2012 was used. Best practices during labor occurred in less than 50% of women and prevalence of the use of these practices was lower in the North, Northeast and Central West Regions. The rate of use of oxytocin drips and amniotomy was 40%, and was higher among women admitted to public hospitals and in women with a low level of education. The uterine fundal pressure, episiotomy and lithotomy were used in 37%, 56% and 92% of women, respectively. Caesarean section rates were lower in women using the public health system, nonwhites, women with a low level of education and multiparous women. To improve the health of mothers and newborns and promote quality of life, a change of approach to labor and childbirth that focuses on evidence-based care is required in both the public and private health sectors.Se evaluó el uso de buenas prácticas (alimentación, métodos no farmacológicos para el alivio del dolor, caminar y el uso del partograma), además de las intervenciones obstétricas durante el parto, en mujeres con un riesgo obstétrico habitual. Los datos provienen del estudio Nacer en Brasil, una cohorte de base hospitalaria realizada en 2011-2012, con entrevistas a 23.894 mujeres. Las buenas prácticas durante el parto se produjeron en menos de un 50% y fueron menos frecuentes en el Norte, Nordeste y Centro-oeste. El uso de oxitocina y amniotomía fue del 40%, principalmente, en el sector público y en las mujeres de menor nivel educativo. La presión fúndica uterina, episiotomía y litotomía fueron utilizados en: un 37%, 56% y 92% respectivamente. La cesárea fue menos frecuente en mujeres que son usuarias del sector público, no blancas, con menor nivel educativo y multíparas. Para mejorar la salud de las madres y los niños, y con el fin de promover la calidad de vida, el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS), y sobre todo el sector privado, necesitará cambiar el modelo de atención obstétrica mediante la adopción de evidencias científicas.Este artigo avaliou o uso das boas práticas (alimentação, deambulação, uso de métodos não farmacológicos para alívio da dor e de partograma) e de intervenções obstétricas na assistência ao trabalho de parto e parto de mulheres de risco obstétrico habitual. Foram utilizados dados da pesquisa Nascer no Brasil, estudo de base hospitalar realizada em 2011/2012, com entrevistas de 23.894 mulheres. As boas práticas durante o trabalho de parto ocorreram em menos de 50% das mulheres, sendo menos frequentes nas regiões Norte, Nordeste e Centro-oeste. O uso de ocitocina e amniotomia foi de 40%, sendo maior no setor público e nas mulheres com menor escolaridade. A manobra de Kristeller, episiotomia e litotomia foram utilizada, em 37%, 56% e 92% das mulheres, respectivamente. A cesariana foi menos frequente nas usuárias do setor público, não brancas, com menor escolaridade e multíparas. Para melhorar a saúde de mães e crianças e promover a qualidade de vida, o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e, sobretudo o setor privado, necessitam mudar o modelo de atenção obstétrica promovendo um cuidado baseado em evidências científicas.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469Reports in Public Health; Vol. 30 No. 13 (2014): Supplement 1Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 30 n. 13 (2014): Suplemento 11678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11264https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11265https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11266https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11267Maria do Carmo LealAna Paula Esteves PereiraRosa Maria Soares Madeira DominguesMariza Miranda Theme FilhaMarcos Augusto Bastos DiasMarcos Nakamura-PereiraMaria Helena BastosSilvana Granado Nogueira da Gamainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:28:44Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5469Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:06:17.226921Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
Intervenções obstétricas durante o trabalho de parto e parto em mulheres brasileiras de risco habitual
title Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
spellingShingle Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
Maria do Carmo Leal
Public Health Practice
Maternal and Child Health
Obstretic Labor
Parturition
Práticas de Saúde Pública
Saúde Materno-Infantil
Trabalho de Parto
Parto
title_short Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
title_full Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
title_fullStr Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
title_sort Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women
author Maria do Carmo Leal
author_facet Maria do Carmo Leal
Ana Paula Esteves Pereira
Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues
Mariza Miranda Theme Filha
Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias
Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
Maria Helena Bastos
Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
author_role author
author2 Ana Paula Esteves Pereira
Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues
Mariza Miranda Theme Filha
Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias
Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
Maria Helena Bastos
Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maria do Carmo Leal
Ana Paula Esteves Pereira
Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues
Mariza Miranda Theme Filha
Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias
Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
Maria Helena Bastos
Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public Health Practice
Maternal and Child Health
Obstretic Labor
Parturition
Práticas de Saúde Pública
Saúde Materno-Infantil
Trabalho de Parto
Parto
topic Public Health Practice
Maternal and Child Health
Obstretic Labor
Parturition
Práticas de Saúde Pública
Saúde Materno-Infantil
Trabalho de Parto
Parto
description This study evaluated the use of best practices (eating, movement, use of nonpharmacological methods for pain relief and partograph) and obstetric interventions in labor and delivery among low-risk women. Data from the hospital-based survey Birth in Brazil conducted between 2011 and 2012 was used. Best practices during labor occurred in less than 50% of women and prevalence of the use of these practices was lower in the North, Northeast and Central West Regions. The rate of use of oxytocin drips and amniotomy was 40%, and was higher among women admitted to public hospitals and in women with a low level of education. The uterine fundal pressure, episiotomy and lithotomy were used in 37%, 56% and 92% of women, respectively. Caesarean section rates were lower in women using the public health system, nonwhites, women with a low level of education and multiparous women. To improve the health of mothers and newborns and promote quality of life, a change of approach to labor and childbirth that focuses on evidence-based care is required in both the public and private health sectors.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11264
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11265
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11266
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5469/11267
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 30 No. 13 (2014): Supplement 1
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 30 n. 13 (2014): Suplemento 1
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943376110780416