Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Szwarcwald,Celia Landmann, Almeida,Wanessa da Silva de, Damacena,Giseli Nogueira, Pedroso,Marcel de Moraes, Sousa,Carlos Augusto Moreira de, Morais,Igor da Silva, Saldanha,Raphael de Freitas, Lima,Jefferson, Stopa,Sheila Rizzato
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022001304001
Resumo: Our objective is to describe the differences in the sampling plans of the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS 2013 and 2019) and to evaluate how the changes affected the coefficient of variation (CV) and the design effect (Deff) of some estimated indicators. Variables from different parts of the questionnaire were analyzed to cover proportions with different magnitudes. The prevalence of obesity was included in the analysis since anthropometry measurement in the 2019 survey was performed in a subsample. The value of the point estimate, CV, and the Deff were calculated for each indicator, considering the stratification of the primary sampling units, the weighting of the sampling units, and the clustering effect. The CV and the Deff were lower in the 2019 estimates for most indicators. Concerning the questionnaire indicators of all household members, the Deffs were high and reached values greater than 18 for having a health insurance plan. Regarding the indicators of the individual questionnaire, for the prevalence of obesity, the Deff ranged from 2.7 to 4.2, in 2013, and from 2.7 to 10.2, in 2019. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes per Federative Unit had a higher CV and lower Deff. Expanding the sample size to meet the diverse health objectives and the high Deff are significant challenges for developing probabilistic household-based national survey. New probabilistic sampling strategies should be considered to reduce costs and clustering effects.
id FIOCRUZ-5_4af4b460d57d970e3298152b7bccfe87
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-311X2022001304001
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019Health SurveysSampling StudiesEpidemiologic Research DesignOur objective is to describe the differences in the sampling plans of the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS 2013 and 2019) and to evaluate how the changes affected the coefficient of variation (CV) and the design effect (Deff) of some estimated indicators. Variables from different parts of the questionnaire were analyzed to cover proportions with different magnitudes. The prevalence of obesity was included in the analysis since anthropometry measurement in the 2019 survey was performed in a subsample. The value of the point estimate, CV, and the Deff were calculated for each indicator, considering the stratification of the primary sampling units, the weighting of the sampling units, and the clustering effect. The CV and the Deff were lower in the 2019 estimates for most indicators. Concerning the questionnaire indicators of all household members, the Deffs were high and reached values greater than 18 for having a health insurance plan. Regarding the indicators of the individual questionnaire, for the prevalence of obesity, the Deff ranged from 2.7 to 4.2, in 2013, and from 2.7 to 10.2, in 2019. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes per Federative Unit had a higher CV and lower Deff. Expanding the sample size to meet the diverse health objectives and the high Deff are significant challenges for developing probabilistic household-based national survey. New probabilistic sampling strategies should be considered to reduce costs and clustering effects.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022001304001Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 suppl.1 2022reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0102-311x00164321info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges deSzwarcwald,Celia LandmannAlmeida,Wanessa da Silva deDamacena,Giseli NogueiraPedroso,Marcel de MoraesSousa,Carlos Augusto Moreira deMorais,Igor da SilvaSaldanha,Raphael de FreitasLima,JeffersonStopa,Sheila Rizzatoeng2022-07-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2022001304001Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2022-07-11T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
title Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
spellingShingle Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
Souza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges de
Health Surveys
Sampling Studies
Epidemiologic Research Design
title_short Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
title_full Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
title_fullStr Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
title_sort Comparison of sampling designs from the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019
author Souza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges de
author_facet Souza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges de
Szwarcwald,Celia Landmann
Almeida,Wanessa da Silva de
Damacena,Giseli Nogueira
Pedroso,Marcel de Moraes
Sousa,Carlos Augusto Moreira de
Morais,Igor da Silva
Saldanha,Raphael de Freitas
Lima,Jefferson
Stopa,Sheila Rizzato
author_role author
author2 Szwarcwald,Celia Landmann
Almeida,Wanessa da Silva de
Damacena,Giseli Nogueira
Pedroso,Marcel de Moraes
Sousa,Carlos Augusto Moreira de
Morais,Igor da Silva
Saldanha,Raphael de Freitas
Lima,Jefferson
Stopa,Sheila Rizzato
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza Júnior,Paulo Roberto Borges de
Szwarcwald,Celia Landmann
Almeida,Wanessa da Silva de
Damacena,Giseli Nogueira
Pedroso,Marcel de Moraes
Sousa,Carlos Augusto Moreira de
Morais,Igor da Silva
Saldanha,Raphael de Freitas
Lima,Jefferson
Stopa,Sheila Rizzato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Surveys
Sampling Studies
Epidemiologic Research Design
topic Health Surveys
Sampling Studies
Epidemiologic Research Design
description Our objective is to describe the differences in the sampling plans of the two editions of the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS 2013 and 2019) and to evaluate how the changes affected the coefficient of variation (CV) and the design effect (Deff) of some estimated indicators. Variables from different parts of the questionnaire were analyzed to cover proportions with different magnitudes. The prevalence of obesity was included in the analysis since anthropometry measurement in the 2019 survey was performed in a subsample. The value of the point estimate, CV, and the Deff were calculated for each indicator, considering the stratification of the primary sampling units, the weighting of the sampling units, and the clustering effect. The CV and the Deff were lower in the 2019 estimates for most indicators. Concerning the questionnaire indicators of all household members, the Deffs were high and reached values greater than 18 for having a health insurance plan. Regarding the indicators of the individual questionnaire, for the prevalence of obesity, the Deff ranged from 2.7 to 4.2, in 2013, and from 2.7 to 10.2, in 2019. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes per Federative Unit had a higher CV and lower Deff. Expanding the sample size to meet the diverse health objectives and the high Deff are significant challenges for developing probabilistic household-based national survey. New probabilistic sampling strategies should be considered to reduce costs and clustering effects.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022001304001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022001304001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-311x00164321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 suppl.1 2022
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754115743638618112