On health needs: the concept labyrinth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626
Resumo: This study aims to reflect on the intertwining of certain key ideas about what we call “health” within the hegemonic biomedical paradigm: health, disease, health needs, medicalization and medical-industrial complex. This reflection is based on the philosophical contributions of Heller and Wiggins on needs; on the discussion of some authors, especially Canguilhem, about health and illness; and Collins’ sociology of expertise. After pointing out some of the conundrums that arise from the conceptual fluidity of the topics abovementioned, we present a path forward, based on Collins’ proposals about the role of experts in political arguments, to resituate the discussion on health needs.
id FIOCRUZ-5_5af879bde145805e62ceae35f1d78399
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6626
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling On health needs: the concept labyrinthHealth Services Needs and DemandPhilosophyScienceThis study aims to reflect on the intertwining of certain key ideas about what we call “health” within the hegemonic biomedical paradigm: health, disease, health needs, medicalization and medical-industrial complex. This reflection is based on the philosophical contributions of Heller and Wiggins on needs; on the discussion of some authors, especially Canguilhem, about health and illness; and Collins’ sociology of expertise. After pointing out some of the conundrums that arise from the conceptual fluidity of the topics abovementioned, we present a path forward, based on Collins’ proposals about the role of experts in political arguments, to resituate the discussion on health needs.Este estudio tiene como meta reflejar la interrelación de ciertos conceptos clave a los que consideramos “salud”, dentro del paradigma biomédico hegemónico: salud, enfermedad, necesidades de salud, medicalización y complejo médico-industrial. Esta reflexión está basada en las contribuciones filosóficas de Heller y Wiggins sobre las necesidades; sobre la discusión de algunos autores, especialmente Canguilhem, sobre salud y enfermedad; y la sociología de las capacidades de Collins. Tras señalar algunos de los dilemas que surgen, procedentes de la fluidez conceptual de los temas anteriormente mencionados, presentamos el camino a seguir, basado en las propuestas de Collins sobre el papel de los expertos en las discusiones políticas, con el fin de reubicar la discusión sobre las necesidades en el ámbito de la salud.O estudo visa refletir sobre o entrelaçamento entre determinadas ideias-chave sobre o que denominamos “saúde” dentro do paradigma biomédico hegemônico: saúde, doença, necessidades de saúde, medicalização e complexo médico-industrial. A reflexão tem como base os aportes filosóficos de Heller e Wiggins sobre necessidades; a discussão de alguns autores, notadamente Canguilhem, sobre saúde e adoecimento e a sociologia da expertise, de Collins. Depois de identificar alguns dos dilemas que surgem da fluidez conceitual dos temas mencionados acima, apresentamos um caminho para estudos futuros, com base nas propostas de Collins sobre o papel dos experts nos argumentos políticos, para recolocar a discussão sobre necessidades de saúde.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2018-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626Reports in Public Health; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2018): JuneCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 34 n. 6 (2018): Junho1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626/14258https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626/14259Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:27Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6626Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:35.283011Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On health needs: the concept labyrinth
title On health needs: the concept labyrinth
spellingShingle On health needs: the concept labyrinth
Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.
Health Services Needs and Demand
Philosophy
Science
title_short On health needs: the concept labyrinth
title_full On health needs: the concept labyrinth
title_fullStr On health needs: the concept labyrinth
title_full_unstemmed On health needs: the concept labyrinth
title_sort On health needs: the concept labyrinth
author Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.
author_facet Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kenneth Rochel de Camargo Jr.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Services Needs and Demand
Philosophy
Science
topic Health Services Needs and Demand
Philosophy
Science
description This study aims to reflect on the intertwining of certain key ideas about what we call “health” within the hegemonic biomedical paradigm: health, disease, health needs, medicalization and medical-industrial complex. This reflection is based on the philosophical contributions of Heller and Wiggins on needs; on the discussion of some authors, especially Canguilhem, about health and illness; and Collins’ sociology of expertise. After pointing out some of the conundrums that arise from the conceptual fluidity of the topics abovementioned, we present a path forward, based on Collins’ proposals about the role of experts in political arguments, to resituate the discussion on health needs.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626/14258
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6626/14259
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2018): June
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 34 n. 6 (2018): Junho
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1816705376293224449

Registros relacionados