Mídia, clonagem e bioética
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318 |
Resumo: | This article was based on an analysis of three hundred articles from mainstream Brazilian periodicals over a period of eighteen months, beginning with the announcement of the Dolly case in February 1997. There were two main objectives: to outline the moral constants in the press associated with the possibility of cloning human beings and to identify some of the moral assumptions concerning scientific research with non-human animals that were published carelessly by the media. The authors conclude that there was a haphazard spread of fear concerning the cloning of human beings rather than an ethical debate on the issue, and that there is a serious gap between bioethical reflections and the Brazilian media. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_645d025717869828a45e8aeca65a9140 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1318 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mídia, clonagem e bioéticaClonagemMídiaPeriódicosBioéticaThis article was based on an analysis of three hundred articles from mainstream Brazilian periodicals over a period of eighteen months, beginning with the announcement of the Dolly case in February 1997. There were two main objectives: to outline the moral constants in the press associated with the possibility of cloning human beings and to identify some of the moral assumptions concerning scientific research with non-human animals that were published carelessly by the media. The authors conclude that there was a haphazard spread of fear concerning the cloning of human beings rather than an ethical debate on the issue, and that there is a serious gap between bioethical reflections and the Brazilian media.Para este artigo, foram analisadas trezentas matérias extraídas dos principais jornais da mídia impressa brasileira sobre o tema da clonagem, em um período de dezoito meses, a contar do anúncio de Dolly, feito em fevereiro de 1997. A análise do material teve dois grandes objetivos: mapear os constantes morais a que a possibilidade da clonagem de seres humanos esteve associada e identificar alguns dos pressupostos morais da pesquisa científica com animais não-humanos e que foram reproduzidos irrefletidamente pela mídia. Além do reconhecimento de que houve antes uma difusão irrefletida do medo da clonagem em seres humanos que mesmo um debate ético frente à questão, a conclusão a que os autores chegaram com este estudo foi que há um sério descompasso entre as reflexões bioéticas e a mídia brasileira.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2000-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318Reports in Public Health; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2000): January/MarchCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 16 n. 1 (2000): Janeiro/Março1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318/2624https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318/2625Costa, Sérgio Ibiapina FerreiraDiniz, Déborainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:26:23Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1318Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:35.014253Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
title |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
spellingShingle |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética Costa, Sérgio Ibiapina Ferreira Clonagem Mídia Periódicos Bioética |
title_short |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
title_full |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
title_fullStr |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
title_sort |
Mídia, clonagem e bioética |
author |
Costa, Sérgio Ibiapina Ferreira |
author_facet |
Costa, Sérgio Ibiapina Ferreira Diniz, Débora |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Diniz, Débora |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Sérgio Ibiapina Ferreira Diniz, Débora |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clonagem Mídia Periódicos Bioética |
topic |
Clonagem Mídia Periódicos Bioética |
description |
This article was based on an analysis of three hundred articles from mainstream Brazilian periodicals over a period of eighteen months, beginning with the announcement of the Dolly case in February 1997. There were two main objectives: to outline the moral constants in the press associated with the possibility of cloning human beings and to identify some of the moral assumptions concerning scientific research with non-human animals that were published carelessly by the media. The authors conclude that there was a haphazard spread of fear concerning the cloning of human beings rather than an ethical debate on the issue, and that there is a serious gap between bioethical reflections and the Brazilian media. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318/2624 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1318/2625 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2000): January/March Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 16 n. 1 (2000): Janeiro/Março 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943347572736000 |