Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264 |
Resumo: | A participatory, formative meta-evaluation of baseline studies in Brazil is presented. International standards recommended by associations of evaluators were used, along with "specificity" criteria built up using the terms of reference for proposals for the selection of studies. The methodological approach combined a "peer review" of baseline study reports, with a participatory (self) assessment for "primary" evaluators, the average of which provided the final score. Results revealed a classification of "good" and "very good" for the set of standards. The differences between the attribution of scores further highlight the importance of taking into account multiple points of view. Given the lack of pre-existing standards for the reports, the absence of standards and the incipient nature of evaluation focusing on utility, this meta-evaluation does not adequately reflect the quality or potential utility of the baseline studies, however, it will certainly contribute to overcoming these limitations and improving future impact studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project (PROESF). |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_77b812620ef81c89e8480c5cdbb903e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4264 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approachFamily Health ProgramHealth EvaluationEvaluation StudiesA participatory, formative meta-evaluation of baseline studies in Brazil is presented. International standards recommended by associations of evaluators were used, along with "specificity" criteria built up using the terms of reference for proposals for the selection of studies. The methodological approach combined a "peer review" of baseline study reports, with a participatory (self) assessment for "primary" evaluators, the average of which provided the final score. Results revealed a classification of "good" and "very good" for the set of standards. The differences between the attribution of scores further highlight the importance of taking into account multiple points of view. Given the lack of pre-existing standards for the reports, the absence of standards and the incipient nature of evaluation focusing on utility, this meta-evaluation does not adequately reflect the quality or potential utility of the baseline studies, however, it will certainly contribute to overcoming these limitations and improving future impact studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project (PROESF).O trabalho apresenta os resultados da meta-avaliação formativa e participativa dos estudos de linha de base no Brasil. Utilizaram-se padrões internacionais preconizados pelas associações de avaliadores e critérios de especificidade construídos usando o termo de referência para seleção de propostas de estudo. A abordagem metodológica associou "revisão de pares" dos relatórios municipais dos estudos de linha de base, com um processo de participação e (auto) qualificação pelos avaliadores "primários", cuja média gerou a classificação final. Os resultados mostram uma classificação entre "bom" e "muito bom" para o conjunto dos parâmetros. As diferenças na atribuição de escores reforçam a importância de se garantirem múltiplos pontos de vista. Considerando a falta de padronização prévia dos relatórios, inexistência de padrões e incipiência das práticas avaliativas com foco na utilidade, provavelmente esta meta-avaliação não refletiu adequadamente a qualidade e uso potencial dos estudos, mas certamente contribuirá para aprimorar os estudos futuro de impacto do Projeto de Expansão da Estratégia Saúde da Família (PROESF).Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264Reports in Public Health; Vol. 26 No. 12 (2010): DecemberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 26 n. 12 (2010): Dezembro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264/8677https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264/8678Figueiró, Ana CláudiaHartz, Zulmira Maria de AraújoThuler, Luiz Claudio SantosDias, André Luiz Freitasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:28:04Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4264Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:04:55.499161Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
title |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
spellingShingle |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach Figueiró, Ana Cláudia Family Health Program Health Evaluation Evaluation Studies |
title_short |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
title_full |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
title_fullStr |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
title_sort |
Meta-evaluation of baseline studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project: a participatory and formative approach |
author |
Figueiró, Ana Cláudia |
author_facet |
Figueiró, Ana Cláudia Hartz, Zulmira Maria de Araújo Thuler, Luiz Claudio Santos Dias, André Luiz Freitas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hartz, Zulmira Maria de Araújo Thuler, Luiz Claudio Santos Dias, André Luiz Freitas |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Figueiró, Ana Cláudia Hartz, Zulmira Maria de Araújo Thuler, Luiz Claudio Santos Dias, André Luiz Freitas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Family Health Program Health Evaluation Evaluation Studies |
topic |
Family Health Program Health Evaluation Evaluation Studies |
description |
A participatory, formative meta-evaluation of baseline studies in Brazil is presented. International standards recommended by associations of evaluators were used, along with "specificity" criteria built up using the terms of reference for proposals for the selection of studies. The methodological approach combined a "peer review" of baseline study reports, with a participatory (self) assessment for "primary" evaluators, the average of which provided the final score. Results revealed a classification of "good" and "very good" for the set of standards. The differences between the attribution of scores further highlight the importance of taking into account multiple points of view. Given the lack of pre-existing standards for the reports, the absence of standards and the incipient nature of evaluation focusing on utility, this meta-evaluation does not adequately reflect the quality or potential utility of the baseline studies, however, it will certainly contribute to overcoming these limitations and improving future impact studies of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy Expansion Project (PROESF). |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264/8677 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4264/8678 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 26 No. 12 (2010): December Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 26 n. 12 (2010): Dezembro 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1816705361639374848 |