Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364 |
Resumo: | Previous reviews on the subject of abortion in Brazil have estimated one million procedures per year but did not address legal abortion. This systematic review sought to update knowledge regarding legal abortion in terms of service and women’s profile, student and doctor knowledge, situations of anencephaly and severe malformations. We searched MEDLINE and LILACS for articles published in all languages between 2008 and 2018. Article quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Search, selection, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers. We selected 20 articles, 11 on the knowledge and opinion of medical professionals (4 articles) and students (7 articles) revealing a less-than-ideal level of knowledge and a high degree of objection of conscience. Six studies on women who use legal abortion services found that they are young, single and that the main demand was for pregnancy resulting from rape. When women were younger and single and when the aggressor was someone close to them, there were delays in seeking care. Three studies on severe malformation found around 40% of court authorizations. In cases for which no authorization was given, the evolution of pregnancies was complicated and deliveries were done through cesarean sections. Only one article addressed legal abortion services, showing that 37 of the 68 that had been registered were active, lack of services in seven states and concentration in capitals. Knowledge regarding legal abortion is still scarce, the demand for the procedure is repressed and medical training is deficient with regard to this subject. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_7d714db5815bde263709aa6f0f453ca5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7364 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018Aborto legal no Brasil: revisão sistemática da produção científica, 2008-2018Legal AbortionReproductive RightsSystematic ReviewAborto LegalDireitos Sexuais ReprodutivosRevisão SistemáticaPrevious reviews on the subject of abortion in Brazil have estimated one million procedures per year but did not address legal abortion. This systematic review sought to update knowledge regarding legal abortion in terms of service and women’s profile, student and doctor knowledge, situations of anencephaly and severe malformations. We searched MEDLINE and LILACS for articles published in all languages between 2008 and 2018. Article quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Search, selection, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers. We selected 20 articles, 11 on the knowledge and opinion of medical professionals (4 articles) and students (7 articles) revealing a less-than-ideal level of knowledge and a high degree of objection of conscience. Six studies on women who use legal abortion services found that they are young, single and that the main demand was for pregnancy resulting from rape. When women were younger and single and when the aggressor was someone close to them, there were delays in seeking care. Three studies on severe malformation found around 40% of court authorizations. In cases for which no authorization was given, the evolution of pregnancies was complicated and deliveries were done through cesarean sections. Only one article addressed legal abortion services, showing that 37 of the 68 that had been registered were active, lack of services in seven states and concentration in capitals. Knowledge regarding legal abortion is still scarce, the demand for the procedure is repressed and medical training is deficient with regard to this subject.Revisiones anteriores sobre el aborto en Brasil estimaron un millón de procedimientos anuales, sin embargo, no abordaron el aborto legal. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue actualizar el conocimiento sobre el aborto legal, en cuanto al perfil de los servicios, de las mujeres atendidas, conocimiento de estudiantes y médicos, situación de anencefalia y malformaciones graves. La búsqueda de artículos fue vía MEDLINE y LILACS, de 2008 a 2018, sin restricción de idiomas. La calidad de los artículos se evaluó con instrumentos del Joanna Briggs Institute. La búsqueda, selección, evaluación de la calidad y extracción de datos fueron realizadas independientemente por parte de dos investigadoras. Se seleccionaron 20 artículos, 11 sobre conocimiento y opinión de profesionales médicos (4 artículos) y estudiantes de Medicina (7 artículos), revelando conocimiento inferior al ideal sobre el aborto legal y la objeción de conciencia. Seis estudios sobre las mujeres atendidas identificaron que se trata de jóvenes, solteras y la principal demanda fue el embarazo ocasionado por una violación. La tardanza en buscar atención se produjo entre las más jóvenes, solteras y cuando el agresor era alguien cercano. Tres estudios sobre malformaciones graves mostraron una autorización judicial en torno a un 40%. En los casos sin autorización, la evolución del embarazo fue complicada y el parto fue por cesárea. Solamente un artículo abordó los servicios de aborto legal, apuntando 37 de los 68 registrados en actividad, inexistencia en siete estados y concentración en las capitales. El conocimiento sobre el aborto legal todavía es escaso, la demanda de la intervención está reprimida y la formación médica es deficiente en el tema.Revisões anteriores sobre o aborto no Brasil estimaram um milhão de procedimentos anuais, porém, não abordaram o aborto legal. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi atualizar o conhecimento sobre o aborto legal, quanto ao perfil dos serviços, das mulheres atendidas, conhecimento de estudantes e médicos, situação de anencefalia e malformações graves. A busca de artigos foi via MEDLINE e LILACS, de 2008 a 2018, sem restrição de idiomas. A qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada com instrumentos do Joanna Briggs Institute. Busca, seleção, avaliação de qualidade e extração de dados foram feitas independentemente por duas pesquisadoras. Selecionaram-se 20 artigos, 11 sobre conhecimento e opinião de profissionais médicos (4 artigos) e estudantes de Medicina (7 artigos), revelando conhecimento aquém do ideal sobre o aborto legal e objeção de consciência elevada. Seis estudos sobre as mulheres atendidas identificaram que elas são jovens, solteiras e a principal demanda foi a gravidez decorrente de estupro. A demora em procurar atendimento ocorreu dentre as mais jovens, solteiras e quando o agressor era alguém próximo. Três estudos sobre malformações graves mostraram autorização judicial em torno de 40%. Nos casos sem autorização, a evolução da gravidez foi complicada e o parto foi cesáreo. Apenas um artigo abordou os serviços de aborto legal, apontando 37 dos 68 cadastrados em atividade, inexistência em sete estados e concentração nas capitais. O conhecimento sobre o aborto legal ainda é escasso, a demanda do procedimento é reprimida e a formação médica é deficiente no tema.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2020-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 13 (2020): Supplement 1Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 13 (2020): Suplemento 11678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16226https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16227https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16228https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16229Sandra Costa FonsecaRosa Maria Soares Madeira DominguesMaria do Carmo LealEstela M. L. AquinoGreice M. S. Menezesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:54Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7364Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:27.762729Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 Aborto legal no Brasil: revisão sistemática da produção científica, 2008-2018 |
title |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
spellingShingle |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 Sandra Costa Fonseca Legal Abortion Reproductive Rights Systematic Review Aborto Legal Direitos Sexuais Reprodutivos Revisão Sistemática |
title_short |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
title_full |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
title_fullStr |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
title_sort |
Legal abortion in Brazil: systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 |
author |
Sandra Costa Fonseca |
author_facet |
Sandra Costa Fonseca Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues Maria do Carmo Leal Estela M. L. Aquino Greice M. S. Menezes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues Maria do Carmo Leal Estela M. L. Aquino Greice M. S. Menezes |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sandra Costa Fonseca Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues Maria do Carmo Leal Estela M. L. Aquino Greice M. S. Menezes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legal Abortion Reproductive Rights Systematic Review Aborto Legal Direitos Sexuais Reprodutivos Revisão Sistemática |
topic |
Legal Abortion Reproductive Rights Systematic Review Aborto Legal Direitos Sexuais Reprodutivos Revisão Sistemática |
description |
Previous reviews on the subject of abortion in Brazil have estimated one million procedures per year but did not address legal abortion. This systematic review sought to update knowledge regarding legal abortion in terms of service and women’s profile, student and doctor knowledge, situations of anencephaly and severe malformations. We searched MEDLINE and LILACS for articles published in all languages between 2008 and 2018. Article quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Search, selection, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers. We selected 20 articles, 11 on the knowledge and opinion of medical professionals (4 articles) and students (7 articles) revealing a less-than-ideal level of knowledge and a high degree of objection of conscience. Six studies on women who use legal abortion services found that they are young, single and that the main demand was for pregnancy resulting from rape. When women were younger and single and when the aggressor was someone close to them, there were delays in seeking care. Three studies on severe malformation found around 40% of court authorizations. In cases for which no authorization was given, the evolution of pregnancies was complicated and deliveries were done through cesarean sections. Only one article addressed legal abortion services, showing that 37 of the 68 that had been registered were active, lack of services in seven states and concentration in capitals. Knowledge regarding legal abortion is still scarce, the demand for the procedure is repressed and medical training is deficient with regard to this subject. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16226 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16227 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16228 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7364/16229 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 13 (2020): Supplement 1 Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 13 (2020): Suplemento 1 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943391655919616 |