Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194 |
Resumo: | In recent years, rhetorical and semantic disjunctions have been used to validate practices traditionally rejected as ethical transgressions. According to such research ethics, subjects unable to exercise their autonomy are freely recruited, and vulnerable individuals are incorporated into research that purportedly serves the common good. The suggestions violate established rules that prohibit placing social or scientific interests above individual needs. The common good is invoked arbitrarily, since most such research serves private corporate interests. The definitions of coercion and exploitation are weakened, thus allowing the inclusion of mentally compromised research subjects and validating practices that have been viewed historically as overt ethical transgressions of research with human beings. An increasing number of research projects are being transferred to Latin America, making it necessary for local bioethics committees to remain alert in the wake of practices that weaken the protection of individuals and communities participating in studies supported by First World commercial interests. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_8cb85e20d769d7af918fa1dae78e6529 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3194 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigaciónÉtica en InvestigacciónConsentimiento InformadoDeclaración de HelsinkiVulnerabilidadIn recent years, rhetorical and semantic disjunctions have been used to validate practices traditionally rejected as ethical transgressions. According to such research ethics, subjects unable to exercise their autonomy are freely recruited, and vulnerable individuals are incorporated into research that purportedly serves the common good. The suggestions violate established rules that prohibit placing social or scientific interests above individual needs. The common good is invoked arbitrarily, since most such research serves private corporate interests. The definitions of coercion and exploitation are weakened, thus allowing the inclusion of mentally compromised research subjects and validating practices that have been viewed historically as overt ethical transgressions of research with human beings. An increasing number of research projects are being transferred to Latin America, making it necessary for local bioethics committees to remain alert in the wake of practices that weaken the protection of individuals and communities participating in studies supported by First World commercial interests.Comienza en recientes años un movimiento de revisión que utiliza la retórica y las desarticulaciones semánticas para legitimar prácticas que tradicionalmente se rechazarían como transgresiones éticas. En la ética de investigación se valida el reclutamiento de personas incapaces de ejercer su autonomía y se propone la incorporación de individuos vulnerados en la investigación para satisfacer el bien común. Esta propuesta atenta contra normativas establecidas que prohíben preferir intereses sociales o científicos por encima de los individuales, utilizando arbitrariamente la idea del bien público, puesto que la mayoría de las investigaciones sirven a intereses particulares de orden corporativo. Se debilita las definiciones de coerción y explotación, justificando la inclusión de probandos carentes de competencia mental y legitimando prácticas que en el entendido usual de estos conceptos son francas transgresiones a la ética de investigación con seres humanos. Cada vez más proyectos de investigación son trasladados a Latinoamérica, haciendo necesario que nuestra bioética se mantenga alerta frente a los intentos de debilitar la protección de individuos y comunidades que participan en estudios patrocinados desde instituciones comerciales del Primer Mundo.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2007-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194Reports in Public Health; Vol. 23 No. 10 (2007): OctoberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 23 n. 10 (2007): Outubro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194/6454https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194/6455Kottow, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:27:27Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3194Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:03:43.058404Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
title |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
spellingShingle |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación Kottow, Miguel Ética en Investigacción Consentimiento Informado Declaración de Helsinki Vulnerabilidad |
title_short |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
title_full |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
title_fullStr |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
title_sort |
Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación |
author |
Kottow, Miguel |
author_facet |
Kottow, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kottow, Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ética en Investigacción Consentimiento Informado Declaración de Helsinki Vulnerabilidad |
topic |
Ética en Investigacción Consentimiento Informado Declaración de Helsinki Vulnerabilidad |
description |
In recent years, rhetorical and semantic disjunctions have been used to validate practices traditionally rejected as ethical transgressions. According to such research ethics, subjects unable to exercise their autonomy are freely recruited, and vulnerable individuals are incorporated into research that purportedly serves the common good. The suggestions violate established rules that prohibit placing social or scientific interests above individual needs. The common good is invoked arbitrarily, since most such research serves private corporate interests. The definitions of coercion and exploitation are weakened, thus allowing the inclusion of mentally compromised research subjects and validating practices that have been viewed historically as overt ethical transgressions of research with human beings. An increasing number of research projects are being transferred to Latin America, making it necessary for local bioethics committees to remain alert in the wake of practices that weaken the protection of individuals and communities participating in studies supported by First World commercial interests. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194/6454 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3194/6455 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 23 No. 10 (2007): October Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 23 n. 10 (2007): Outubro 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943359545376768 |