COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Latin America and Africa: a scoping review

• Autor(a) principal: Aparecida Gonçalves, Bruna
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Carvalho de Souza Amorim Matos, Camila, Vicente dos Santos Ferreira, Jonathan, Fortes Itagyba, Renata, Rocha Moço, Vinicius, Thereza Couto, Márcia
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
• Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8325
• topic: Hesitação Vacinal; Vacinas Contra COVID-19; Saúde Global; Vacilación a la Vacunación; Vacunas Contra la COVID-19; Salud Global; Vaccination Hesitancy; COVID-19 Vaccines; Global Health

Vaccination has played an important role in the containment of COVID-19 pandemic advances. However, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy has caused a global concern. This scoping review aims to map the scientific literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Latin America and Africa from a Global Health perspective, observing the particularities of the Global South and using parameters validated by the World Health Organization (WHO). The review reporting observes the recommendations of the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) model. Search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases, selecting studies published from January 1, 2020 to January 22, 2022. Selected studies indicate that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy involves factors such as political scenario, spread of misinformation, regional differences in each territory regarding Internet access, lack of access to information, history of vaccination resistance, lack of information about the disease and the vaccine, concern about adverse events, and vaccine efficacy and safety. Regarding the use of conceptual and methodology references from the WHO for vaccine hesitancy, few studies (6/94) use research instruments based on these references. Then, the replication in Global South of conceptual and methodological parameters developed by experts from the Global North contexts has been criticized from the perspective of Global Health because of it may not consider political and sociocultural particularities, the different nuances of vaccine hesitancy, and issues of access to vaccines.