Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Eleonora de Magalhães Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Marcelo Alves do Santos Junior, Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Luisa Massarani, Marilia Sá Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935
Resumo: Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities’ pages and profiles.
id FIOCRUZ-5_a8e78c3730c6efb846e4fefd4f88cb70
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7935
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)VacinasRede SocialPandemiasDesinformaçãoConsidering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities’ pages and profiles.Dado que Internet y, en particular, las redes sociales funcionan como espacios de circulación de la información sobre el COVID-19, el objetivo de este estudio fue verificar la atención prestada al tema de las vacunas en Instagram y Facebook en los posts realizados a lo largo de dos años de pandemia, identificando la temporalidad en que se produjo la discusión sobre los diferentes inmunizantes en las redes sociales y señalando los actores que permeaban las discusiones que involucraban el tema. La recopilación de datos se realizó mediante la interfaz gráfica de CrowdTangle, a partir de términos de consulta en portugués relacionados con las vacunas aprobadas para su uso en Brasil y contempló publicaciones de páginas públicas en Facebook y perfiles abiertos en Instagram realizadas desde el 1º de enero de 2020 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2021. La base de datos analizada cuenta con 3.876.408 publicaciones (2.901.457 en Facebook y 974.952 en Instagram). Los resultados mostraron una alternancia de las vacunas de Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca y Janssen como foco de discusión, siguiendo temporalmente el debate público que se estableció en el país en torno a los dilemas y avances relacionados con el desarrollo, la producción, la distribución y la aplicación de los inmunizantes. También se identificaron referencias a instituciones involucradas en la adquisición y producción de inmunizantes, como el Ministerio de Salud de Brasil, el Instituto Butantan y la Fundación Oswaldo Cruz, presentes entre los mil actores sociales que más despertaron comentarios de los usuarios en ambas redes. Fue evidente que el debate sobre los inmunizadores, en los canales y período analizados, estuvo permeado por medios vinculados al periodismo, además de páginas y perfiles vinculados a políticos y celebridades.Tendo em vista que a Internet e, em especial, as redes sociais funcionam como lócus para a circulação de informações sobre a COVID-19, o objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a atenção dispensada à temática das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook em postagens feitas ao longo de dois anos de pandemia, identificando a temporalidade em que a discussão sobre os diferentes imunizantes nas redes sociais ocorreu e apontando atores que permearam as discussões envolvendo o tema. A coleta de dados foi feita pela interface gráfica do CrowdTangle, a partir de termos de consulta em português relacionados às vacinas aprovadas para uso no Brasil e contemplou postagens de páginas públicas no Facebook e perfis abertos no Instagram feitas de 1º de janeiro de 2020 a 31 de dezembro de 2021. O banco de dados analisado possui 3.876.408 publicações (2.901.457 no Facebook e 974.952 no Instagram). Os resultados evidenciaram uma alternância das vacinas Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca e Janssen como foco de discussão, acompanhando temporalmente o debate público que se estabeleceu no país em torno dos dilemas e avanços relativos ao desenvolvimento, à produção, à distribuição e à aplicação dos imunizantes. Também foram identificadas referências às instituições envolvidas na aquisição e produção dos imunizantes, como o Ministério da Saúde, o Instituto Butantan e a Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), presentes entre os mil atores sociais que mais despertaram comentários por parte dos usuários em ambas as redes. Evidenciou-se que o debate sobre imunizantes, nos canais e no período analisados, foi permeado por meios de comunicação ligados ao jornalismo, além de páginas e perfis ligados a políticos e celebridades.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2022-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935Reports in Public Health; Vol. 38 No. 11 (2022): NovemberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 11 (2022): Novembro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935/17764https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935/17765Eleonora de Magalhães CarvalhoMarcelo Alves do Santos JuniorLuiz Felipe Fernandes NevesThaiane Moreira de OliveiraLuisa MassaraniMarilia Sá Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:16Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7935Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:09:05.877977Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
title Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
spellingShingle Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
Eleonora de Magalhães Carvalho
Vacinas
Rede Social
Pandemias
Desinformação
title_short Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
title_full Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
title_fullStr Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
title_full_unstemmed Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
title_sort Vacinas e redes sociais: o debate em torno das vacinas no Instagram e Facebook durante a pandemia de COVID-19 (2020-2021)
author Eleonora de Magalhães Carvalho
author_facet Eleonora de Magalhães Carvalho
Marcelo Alves do Santos Junior
Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves
Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira
Luisa Massarani
Marilia Sá Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Marcelo Alves do Santos Junior
Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves
Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira
Luisa Massarani
Marilia Sá Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Eleonora de Magalhães Carvalho
Marcelo Alves do Santos Junior
Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves
Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira
Luisa Massarani
Marilia Sá Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vacinas
Rede Social
Pandemias
Desinformação
topic Vacinas
Rede Social
Pandemias
Desinformação
description Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities’ pages and profiles.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935/17764
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7935/17765
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 38 No. 11 (2022): November
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 11 (2022): Novembro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943396458397696