Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mitjavila, Myriam
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Fernández, José, Moreira, Constanza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679
Resumo: This article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen.
id FIOCRUZ-5_af13151fbeecd2384ed8f4d0a282ef28
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1679
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?EquidadReforma del Sector SaludSistema de SaludReforma en Atención de la SaludThis article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen.En el presente artículo se realizan una revisión y un análisis de las propuestas de reforma del sector Salud en Uruguay, y de los posibles efectos de estas reformas en términos de equidad, estructura institucional del sector y relaciones de poder entre los actores involucrados en el proceso. Encontramos que las características contradictorias del sistema de salud, por un lado altamente estructurado y, al mismo tiempo, fragmentado, conspiran contra los esfuerzos reformistas que intentan introducir cambios en el mismo. En función de lo expresado, las posibilidades de reforma no residen en la consolidación de las IAMC (Instituciones de Asistencia Médica Colectiva) ni en la aplicación del modelo residual. Por el contrario, asistimos a un proceso de reestructuración pasiva del sistema. En este contexto, y teniendo en cuenta el nivel de inequidades existentes, la tendencia que se percibe es de profundización de una distribución regresiva de beneficios y servicios. A partir de técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas, mostramos como las inequidades relacionadas con el gasto, el acceso y la calidad están relacionadas con procesos de desarrollo de largo tiempo del sistema IAMC y con los movimientos adaptativos frentes a su colapso fiscal, por una parte, y con la pérdida de calidad del sistema público, por otra.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2002-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679Reports in Public Health; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2002): July/AugustCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 18 n. 4 (2002): Julho/Agosto1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3346https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3347Mitjavila, MyriamFernández, JoséMoreira, Constanzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:26:34Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1679Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:58.382052Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
title Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
spellingShingle Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
Mitjavila, Myriam
Equidad
Reforma del Sector Salud
Sistema de Salud
Reforma en Atención de la Salud
title_short Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
title_full Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
title_fullStr Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
title_full_unstemmed Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
title_sort Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
author Mitjavila, Myriam
author_facet Mitjavila, Myriam
Fernández, José
Moreira, Constanza
author_role author
author2 Fernández, José
Moreira, Constanza
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mitjavila, Myriam
Fernández, José
Moreira, Constanza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Equidad
Reforma del Sector Salud
Sistema de Salud
Reforma en Atención de la Salud
topic Equidad
Reforma del Sector Salud
Sistema de Salud
Reforma en Atención de la Salud
description This article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3346
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3347
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2002): July/August
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 18 n. 4 (2002): Julho/Agosto
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943349652062208