Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679 |
Resumo: | This article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_af13151fbeecd2384ed8f4d0a282ef28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1679 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State?EquidadReforma del Sector SaludSistema de SaludReforma en Atención de la SaludThis article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen.En el presente artículo se realizan una revisión y un análisis de las propuestas de reforma del sector Salud en Uruguay, y de los posibles efectos de estas reformas en términos de equidad, estructura institucional del sector y relaciones de poder entre los actores involucrados en el proceso. Encontramos que las características contradictorias del sistema de salud, por un lado altamente estructurado y, al mismo tiempo, fragmentado, conspiran contra los esfuerzos reformistas que intentan introducir cambios en el mismo. En función de lo expresado, las posibilidades de reforma no residen en la consolidación de las IAMC (Instituciones de Asistencia Médica Colectiva) ni en la aplicación del modelo residual. Por el contrario, asistimos a un proceso de reestructuración pasiva del sistema. En este contexto, y teniendo en cuenta el nivel de inequidades existentes, la tendencia que se percibe es de profundización de una distribución regresiva de beneficios y servicios. A partir de técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas, mostramos como las inequidades relacionadas con el gasto, el acceso y la calidad están relacionadas con procesos de desarrollo de largo tiempo del sistema IAMC y con los movimientos adaptativos frentes a su colapso fiscal, por una parte, y con la pérdida de calidad del sistema público, por otra.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2002-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679Reports in Public Health; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2002): July/AugustCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 18 n. 4 (2002): Julho/Agosto1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3346https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3347Mitjavila, MyriamFernández, JoséMoreira, Constanzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:26:34Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/1679Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:58.382052Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
title |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
spellingShingle |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? Mitjavila, Myriam Equidad Reforma del Sector Salud Sistema de Salud Reforma en Atención de la Salud |
title_short |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
title_full |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
title_fullStr |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
title_sort |
Propuestas de reforma en salud y equidad en Uruguay: ¿redefinición del Welfare State? |
author |
Mitjavila, Myriam |
author_facet |
Mitjavila, Myriam Fernández, José Moreira, Constanza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernández, José Moreira, Constanza |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mitjavila, Myriam Fernández, José Moreira, Constanza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Equidad Reforma del Sector Salud Sistema de Salud Reforma en Atención de la Salud |
topic |
Equidad Reforma del Sector Salud Sistema de Salud Reforma en Atención de la Salud |
description |
This article reviews and analyzes health sector reform proposals in Uruguay and the possible effects of such reforms in terms of equity, the health sector's institutional structure, and the power relationship between the various actors in the process. The authors contend that a highly structured yet simultaneously fragmented system has conspired against any attempt to introduce major reforms into the system. Thus the only possibility for reform resides neither in the consolidation of the so-called Institutions for Collective Medical Care (IAMCs) nor in the move towards a residual model. Rather, Uruguay is witnessing the system's passive restructuring (i.e., reform by default). In this context and given the system's built-in inequities, the current trend is towards an even more regressive distribution of goods and services. The authors use qualitative and quantitative techniques to show that inequities in expenditure, access, and quality have resulted from long-term developments and adaptive movements of an IAMC system in fiscal stress and the public system's declining quality. Thus, in the absence of changes in state policy that redefine the actors' power or in the absence of system collapse, the country should expect this same regressive trend to deepen. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3346 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/1679/3347 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2002): July/August Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 18 n. 4 (2002): Julho/Agosto 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1821325486539669505 |