Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003 |
Resumo: | This study aims to review the literature on economic evaluation of childhood varicella vaccination programs and to discuss how heterogeneity in methodological aspects and estimation of parameters can affect the studies' results. After applying the inclusion criteria, 27 studies published from 1980 to 2008 were analyzed in relation to methodological differences. There was great heterogeneity in the perspective adopted, evaluation of indirect costs, type of model used, modeling of the effect on herpes zoster, and estimation of vaccine price and efficacy parameters. The factor with the greatest impact on results was the inclusion of indirect costs, followed by the perspective adopted and vaccine price. The choice of a particular methodological aspect or parameter affected the studies' results and conclusions. It is essential that authors present these choices transparently so that users of economic evaluations understand the implications of such choices and the direction in which the results of the analysis were conducted. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_cab5250e98939a9bb3aa36f572295557 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4003 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making?Cost-Effectiveness EvaluationCosts and Cost AnalysisImmunization ProgramsChickenpoxThis study aims to review the literature on economic evaluation of childhood varicella vaccination programs and to discuss how heterogeneity in methodological aspects and estimation of parameters can affect the studies' results. After applying the inclusion criteria, 27 studies published from 1980 to 2008 were analyzed in relation to methodological differences. There was great heterogeneity in the perspective adopted, evaluation of indirect costs, type of model used, modeling of the effect on herpes zoster, and estimation of vaccine price and efficacy parameters. The factor with the greatest impact on results was the inclusion of indirect costs, followed by the perspective adopted and vaccine price. The choice of a particular methodological aspect or parameter affected the studies' results and conclusions. It is essential that authors present these choices transparently so that users of economic evaluations understand the implications of such choices and the direction in which the results of the analysis were conducted.O presente trabalho tem por objetivo rever a literatura sobre avaliação econômica de programas de vacinação infantil contra varicela, e discutir como a heterogeneidade em aspectos metodológicos e na estimativa dos parâmetros pode afetar os resultados dos estudos. Após aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, 27 estudos do período de 1980 a 2008 foram analisados com relação às diferenças metodológicas. Observou-se grande heterogeneidade na perspectiva adotada, valoração dos custos indiretos, tipo de modelo empregado, modelagem do efeito no herpes zoster, e na estimativa dos parâmetros de preço e eficácia da vacina. O fator que mais impactou os resultados foi a inclusão dos custos indiretos seguido da perspectiva e preço de vacina adotados. A escolha de um determinado aspecto metodológico ou parâmetro afetou os resultados e conclusões dos estudos. É de fundamental importância que os autores apresentem essas escolhas com transparência para que os usuários das avaliações econômicas compreendam as repercussões dessas escolhas, e em qual direção os resultados das análises foram conduzidos.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003Reports in Public Health; Vol. 25 No. 15 (2009): Supplement 3Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 25 n. 15 (2009): Suplemento 31678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003/8133https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003/8134Soárez, Patrícia Coelho deNovaes, Hillegonda Maria DutilhSartori, Ana Marli Christovaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:27:57Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4003Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:04:37.326095Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
title |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
spellingShingle |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? Soárez, Patrícia Coelho de Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Costs and Cost Analysis Immunization Programs Chickenpox |
title_short |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
title_full |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
title_fullStr |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
title_sort |
Impact of methodology on the results of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programs: is it important for decision-making? |
author |
Soárez, Patrícia Coelho de |
author_facet |
Soárez, Patrícia Coelho de Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Sartori, Ana Marli Christovan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Sartori, Ana Marli Christovan |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soárez, Patrícia Coelho de Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Sartori, Ana Marli Christovan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Costs and Cost Analysis Immunization Programs Chickenpox |
topic |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Costs and Cost Analysis Immunization Programs Chickenpox |
description |
This study aims to review the literature on economic evaluation of childhood varicella vaccination programs and to discuss how heterogeneity in methodological aspects and estimation of parameters can affect the studies' results. After applying the inclusion criteria, 27 studies published from 1980 to 2008 were analyzed in relation to methodological differences. There was great heterogeneity in the perspective adopted, evaluation of indirect costs, type of model used, modeling of the effect on herpes zoster, and estimation of vaccine price and efficacy parameters. The factor with the greatest impact on results was the inclusion of indirect costs, followed by the perspective adopted and vaccine price. The choice of a particular methodological aspect or parameter affected the studies' results and conclusions. It is essential that authors present these choices transparently so that users of economic evaluations understand the implications of such choices and the direction in which the results of the analysis were conducted. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003/8133 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4003/8134 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 25 No. 15 (2009): Supplement 3 Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 25 n. 15 (2009): Suplemento 3 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943365548474368 |