Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires Yokokura
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva, Juliana de Kássia Braga Fernandes, Cristina Marta Del-Ben, Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Marco Antonio Barbieri, Heloisa Bettiol
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381
Resumo: This study aimed to assess the dimensional structure, reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and scalability of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The sample consisted of 1,447 pregnant women in São Luís (Maranhão State) and 1,400 in Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo State), Brazil. The 14 and 10-item versions of the scale were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, using weighted least squares means and variance (WLSMV). In both cities, the two-factor models (positive factors, measuring resilience to stressful situations, and negative factors, measuring stressful situations) showed better fit than the single-factor models. The two-factor models for the complete (PSS14) and reduced scale (PSS10) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70). All the factor loadings were ≥ 0.50, except for items 8 and 12 of the negative dimension and item 13 of the positive dimension. The correlations between both dimensions of stress and psychological violence showed the expected magnitude (0.46-0.59), providing evidence of an adequate convergent construct validity. The correlations between the scales’ positive and negative dimensions were around 0.74-0.78, less than 0.85, which suggests adequate discriminant validity. Extracted mean variance and scalability were slightly higher for PSS10 than for PSS14. The results were consistent in both cities. In conclusion, the single-factor solution is not recommended for assessing stress in pregnant women. The reduced, 10-item two-factor scale appears to be more appropriate for measuring perceived stress in pregnant women.
id FIOCRUZ-5_dba0674a181e1c0df645b01a72d25a9c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6381
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohortPregnant WomenPsychological StressStatistical Factor AnalysisThis study aimed to assess the dimensional structure, reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and scalability of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The sample consisted of 1,447 pregnant women in São Luís (Maranhão State) and 1,400 in Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo State), Brazil. The 14 and 10-item versions of the scale were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, using weighted least squares means and variance (WLSMV). In both cities, the two-factor models (positive factors, measuring resilience to stressful situations, and negative factors, measuring stressful situations) showed better fit than the single-factor models. The two-factor models for the complete (PSS14) and reduced scale (PSS10) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70). All the factor loadings were ≥ 0.50, except for items 8 and 12 of the negative dimension and item 13 of the positive dimension. The correlations between both dimensions of stress and psychological violence showed the expected magnitude (0.46-0.59), providing evidence of an adequate convergent construct validity. The correlations between the scales’ positive and negative dimensions were around 0.74-0.78, less than 0.85, which suggests adequate discriminant validity. Extracted mean variance and scalability were slightly higher for PSS10 than for PSS14. The results were consistent in both cities. In conclusion, the single-factor solution is not recommended for assessing stress in pregnant women. The reduced, 10-item two-factor scale appears to be more appropriate for measuring perceived stress in pregnant women.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la estructura dimensional, confiabilidad, validez convergente, validez discriminante y escalabilidad de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (EEP). La muestra estaba constituida por 1.447 gestantes de Sao Luis (Maranhão) y 1.400 de Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo), Brasil. Se evaluaron las versiones con 14 y 10 ítems, mediante un análisis factorial confirmatorio, utilizándose el estimador de los mínimos cuadrados ponderados ajustados por la media y variancia (WLSMV). En ambas ciudades, los modelos bifactoriales (factores positivo, midiendo resiliencia a situaciones estresantes, y negativo, midiendo situaciones de estrés) presentaron un mejor ajuste que el de los unifactoriales. Los modelos bifactoriales de la escala completa (EEP14) y de la reducida (EEP10) presentaron una buena consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach ≥ 0.70). Todas las cargas factoriales fueron ≥ 0.50, excepto las de los ítems 8 y 12 de la dimensión negativa y la del ítem 13 de la dimensión positiva. Las correlaciones entre ambas dimensiones del estrés con la violencia psicológica fueron en la magnitud esperada (0,46-0,59), proporcionando evidencia de validez del constructo convergente adecuada. Las correlaciones entre las dimensiones positiva y negativa de las escalas fueron en torno de 0,74-0,78, menores que < 0,85, lo que sugiere una adecuada validez discriminante. La variancia media extraída y la escalabilidad fueron ligeramente mayores para la EEP10 que para la EEP14. Los resultados fueron consistentes en ambas ciudades. En conclusión, la solución unifactorial no está recomendada para evaluar estrés en mujeres embarazadas. La escala bifactorial reducida con 10 ítems parece ser más apropiada para medir el estrés percibido en gestantes.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a estrutura dimensional, confiabilidade, validade convergente, validade discriminante e escalabilidade da Escala de Estresse Percebido (EEP). A amostra foi constituída por 1.447 gestantes de São Luís (Maranhão) e 1.400 de Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo), Brasil. Foram avaliadas as versões com 14 e 10 itens por meio da análise fatorial confirmatória, utilizando-se o estimador dos mínimos quadrados ponderados ajustados pela média e variância (WLSMV). Em ambas as cidades, os modelos bifatoriais (fatores positivo, medindo resiliência a situações estressoras, e negativo, medindo situações de estresse) apresentaram melhor ajuste do que os unifatoriais. Os modelos bifatoriais da escala completa (EEP14) e da reduzida (EEP10) apresentaram boa consistência interna (alfa de Cronbach ≥ 0.70). Todas as cargas fatoriais foram ≥ 0.50, exceto as dos itens 8 e 12 da dimensão negativa e a do item 13 da dimensão positiva. As correlações entre ambas as dimensões do estresse com a violência psicológica foram na magnitude esperada (0,46-0,59), fornecendo evidência de validade de construto convergente adequada. As correlações entre as dimensões positiva e negativa das escalas foram em torno de 0,74-0,78, menores do que < 0,85, o que sugere adequada validade discriminante. A variância média extraída e a escalabilidade foram ligeiramente maiores para a EEP10 do que a para a EEP14. Os resultados foram consistentes em ambas as cidades. Em conclusão, a solução unifatorial não é recomendada para avaliar estresse em mulheres grávidas. A escala bifatorial reduzida com 10 itens parece ser mais apropriada para medir estresse percebido em gestantes.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2017-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 12 (2017): DecemberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 12 (2017): Dezembro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381/13606https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381/13607Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires YokokuraAntônio Augusto Moura da SilvaJuliana de Kássia Braga FernandesCristina Marta Del-BenFelipe Pinheiro de FigueiredoMarco Antonio BarbieriHeloisa Bettiolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:16Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6381Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:18.437704Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
title Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
spellingShingle Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires Yokokura
Pregnant Women
Psychological Stress
Statistical Factor Analysis
title_short Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
title_full Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
title_fullStr Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
title_sort Perceived Stress Scale: confirmatory factor analysis of the PSS14 and PSS10 versions in two samples of pregnant women from the BRISA cohort
author Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires Yokokura
author_facet Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires Yokokura
Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva
Juliana de Kássia Braga Fernandes
Cristina Marta Del-Ben
Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo
Marco Antonio Barbieri
Heloisa Bettiol
author_role author
author2 Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva
Juliana de Kássia Braga Fernandes
Cristina Marta Del-Ben
Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo
Marco Antonio Barbieri
Heloisa Bettiol
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ana Valéria Carvalho Pires Yokokura
Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva
Juliana de Kássia Braga Fernandes
Cristina Marta Del-Ben
Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo
Marco Antonio Barbieri
Heloisa Bettiol
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pregnant Women
Psychological Stress
Statistical Factor Analysis
topic Pregnant Women
Psychological Stress
Statistical Factor Analysis
description This study aimed to assess the dimensional structure, reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and scalability of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The sample consisted of 1,447 pregnant women in São Luís (Maranhão State) and 1,400 in Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo State), Brazil. The 14 and 10-item versions of the scale were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, using weighted least squares means and variance (WLSMV). In both cities, the two-factor models (positive factors, measuring resilience to stressful situations, and negative factors, measuring stressful situations) showed better fit than the single-factor models. The two-factor models for the complete (PSS14) and reduced scale (PSS10) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70). All the factor loadings were ≥ 0.50, except for items 8 and 12 of the negative dimension and item 13 of the positive dimension. The correlations between both dimensions of stress and psychological violence showed the expected magnitude (0.46-0.59), providing evidence of an adequate convergent construct validity. The correlations between the scales’ positive and negative dimensions were around 0.74-0.78, less than 0.85, which suggests adequate discriminant validity. Extracted mean variance and scalability were slightly higher for PSS10 than for PSS14. The results were consistent in both cities. In conclusion, the single-factor solution is not recommended for assessing stress in pregnant women. The reduced, 10-item two-factor scale appears to be more appropriate for measuring perceived stress in pregnant women.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381/13606
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6381/13607
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 12 (2017): December
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 12 (2017): Dezembro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1821325559504830464