Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Luquetti,Daniela Varela
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Koifman,Rosalina Jorge
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2009000800008
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the coverage, validity and reliability of Brazil's Information System on Live Births (SINASC) for birth defects in a hospital in the city of Campinas (São Paulo State). The study population consisted of 2,823 newborn infants delivered in 2004 at the Women's Integrated Health Care Center (CAISM). A birth defect registry (ECLAMC) was used as the gold-standard. All birth defect cases reported at CAISM in 2004 (92 cases) were selected from SINASC data files. All 168 birth defect cases from the same city and year registered at ECLAMC were also retrieved. An underreporting of 46.8% was observed for all birth defects, and 36.4% when considering only the major birth defects. The ascertained sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 54.2% and 99.8%. The reliability of three and four-digit ICD-10 coding for birth defects was 0.77 and 0.55 respectively (kappa statistic). These results suggest that information provided by birth certificates in Campinas still presents limitations when seeking to ascertain accurate estimates of the prevalence of birth defects, hence indicating the need for improvements in the SINASC database to enable it to portray birth defect prevalence at birth in this city.
id FIOCRUZ-5_ff49f56fed40d873b2652a2863499693
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-311X2009000800008
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospitalCongenital AbnormalitiesBirth CertificatesInformation SystemsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the coverage, validity and reliability of Brazil's Information System on Live Births (SINASC) for birth defects in a hospital in the city of Campinas (São Paulo State). The study population consisted of 2,823 newborn infants delivered in 2004 at the Women's Integrated Health Care Center (CAISM). A birth defect registry (ECLAMC) was used as the gold-standard. All birth defect cases reported at CAISM in 2004 (92 cases) were selected from SINASC data files. All 168 birth defect cases from the same city and year registered at ECLAMC were also retrieved. An underreporting of 46.8% was observed for all birth defects, and 36.4% when considering only the major birth defects. The ascertained sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 54.2% and 99.8%. The reliability of three and four-digit ICD-10 coding for birth defects was 0.77 and 0.55 respectively (kappa statistic). These results suggest that information provided by birth certificates in Campinas still presents limitations when seeking to ascertain accurate estimates of the prevalence of birth defects, hence indicating the need for improvements in the SINASC database to enable it to portray birth defect prevalence at birth in this city.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2009000800008Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.25 n.8 2009reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/S0102-311X2009000800008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLuquetti,Daniela VarelaKoifman,Rosalina Jorgeeng2009-07-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2009000800008Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2009-07-27T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
title Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
spellingShingle Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
Luquetti,Daniela Varela
Congenital Abnormalities
Birth Certificates
Information Systems
title_short Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
title_full Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
title_fullStr Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
title_full_unstemmed Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
title_sort Quality of reporting on birth defects in birth certificates: case study from a Brazilian reference hospital
author Luquetti,Daniela Varela
author_facet Luquetti,Daniela Varela
Koifman,Rosalina Jorge
author_role author
author2 Koifman,Rosalina Jorge
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Luquetti,Daniela Varela
Koifman,Rosalina Jorge
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Congenital Abnormalities
Birth Certificates
Information Systems
topic Congenital Abnormalities
Birth Certificates
Information Systems
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the coverage, validity and reliability of Brazil's Information System on Live Births (SINASC) for birth defects in a hospital in the city of Campinas (São Paulo State). The study population consisted of 2,823 newborn infants delivered in 2004 at the Women's Integrated Health Care Center (CAISM). A birth defect registry (ECLAMC) was used as the gold-standard. All birth defect cases reported at CAISM in 2004 (92 cases) were selected from SINASC data files. All 168 birth defect cases from the same city and year registered at ECLAMC were also retrieved. An underreporting of 46.8% was observed for all birth defects, and 36.4% when considering only the major birth defects. The ascertained sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 54.2% and 99.8%. The reliability of three and four-digit ICD-10 coding for birth defects was 0.77 and 0.55 respectively (kappa statistic). These results suggest that information provided by birth certificates in Campinas still presents limitations when seeking to ascertain accurate estimates of the prevalence of birth defects, hence indicating the need for improvements in the SINASC database to enable it to portray birth defect prevalence at birth in this city.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2009000800008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2009000800008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-311X2009000800008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.25 n.8 2009
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754115729460822016