Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | RECIIS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906 |
Resumo: | The object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents the new reproduction biotechnologies in terms of the effect which they are producing on our understanding about human nature and life, as well as the context of the emergence of bioethics, traditionally conceived of as a critical and analytical example of the relationship between technology and humanity. As an alternative way of explaining these relationships, it outlines the aspect of bioethics as a network effect, in which the technology-society hybrid is shown both in the building of bioethical norms and in the instabilities which challenge these norms. As a way of understanding this heterogeneous and complex network, Controversy Analysis is proposed as a methodological tool. In order to illustrate the richness of such perspective, a brief empirical study is presented, in which an attempt is made to track controversies articulated around the relations between bioethics and reproduction biotechnologies, with a specific focus on stem cell research, as published by the on-line media from January of 2004 until July of 2006, raising questions about subjects such as: life, humanity, artifice and autonomy. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-6_26b7b070bef4561b96b6181233e5a52e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/906 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-6 |
network_name_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversiesRedes de bioética e biotecnologias da reprodução: controvérsias teóricas e metodológicasBioethicsreproduction biotechnologiesnetworkscontroversyBioéticabiotecnologias de reproduçãoredescontrovérsiasThe object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents the new reproduction biotechnologies in terms of the effect which they are producing on our understanding about human nature and life, as well as the context of the emergence of bioethics, traditionally conceived of as a critical and analytical example of the relationship between technology and humanity. As an alternative way of explaining these relationships, it outlines the aspect of bioethics as a network effect, in which the technology-society hybrid is shown both in the building of bioethical norms and in the instabilities which challenge these norms. As a way of understanding this heterogeneous and complex network, Controversy Analysis is proposed as a methodological tool. In order to illustrate the richness of such perspective, a brief empirical study is presented, in which an attempt is made to track controversies articulated around the relations between bioethics and reproduction biotechnologies, with a specific focus on stem cell research, as published by the on-line media from January of 2004 until July of 2006, raising questions about subjects such as: life, humanity, artifice and autonomy.O objetivo do presente artigo é refletir sobre a emergência do campo da Bioética na atualidade, particularmente voltada às biotecnologias da reprodução, buscando evidenciar sua articulação como rede de controvérsias. Inicialmente, apresenta as novas biotecnologias de reprodução em termos da instabilidade que são capazes de produzir no que entendemos por natureza humana e vida, bem como o contexto de emergência da Bioética, tradicionalmente concebida como instância crítica e analítica das relações entre tecnologia e humanidade. Como forma alternativa de entender tais relações, delineia a perspectiva de uma bioética como efeito de rede, em que a hibridação entre tecnologia e sociedade se evidencia tanto na construção de normas bioéticas quanto nas instabilidades que desafiam estas normas. Como modo de apreensão desta rede heterogênea e complexa, propõe-se, como ferramenta metodológica, a Análise da Controvérsia. A fim de ilustrar a fertilidade de tal perspectiva, é apresentado um breve estudo empírico, em que se buscou rastrear controvérsias articuladas em torno das relações entre bioética e biotecnologias da reprodução, com foco específico no tema das pesquisas com células-tronco, tal como veiculadas pela mídia on-line no período de janeiro de 2004 a julho de 2006, problematizando-se questões tais como: vida, humanidade, artifício e autonomia.Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz)2007-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/90610.3395/reciis.v1i2.906Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2007)Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 2 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 2 (2007)1981-6278reponame:RECIIS (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906/1549https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906/1616Pedro, Rosa Maria Leite RibeiroNobre, Júlio Cesar de Almeidainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-11T14:24:56Zoai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/906Revistahttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciishttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/oaireciis@icict.fiocruz.br1981-62781981-6278opendoar:2022-08-11T14:24:56RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies Redes de bioética e biotecnologias da reprodução: controvérsias teóricas e metodológicas |
title |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
spellingShingle |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies Pedro, Rosa Maria Leite Ribeiro Bioethics reproduction biotechnologies networks controversy Bioética biotecnologias de reprodução redes controvérsias |
title_short |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
title_full |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
title_fullStr |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
title_sort |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies |
author |
Pedro, Rosa Maria Leite Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Pedro, Rosa Maria Leite Ribeiro Nobre, Júlio Cesar de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nobre, Júlio Cesar de Almeida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pedro, Rosa Maria Leite Ribeiro Nobre, Júlio Cesar de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioethics reproduction biotechnologies networks controversy Bioética biotecnologias de reprodução redes controvérsias |
topic |
Bioethics reproduction biotechnologies networks controversy Bioética biotecnologias de reprodução redes controvérsias |
description |
The object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents the new reproduction biotechnologies in terms of the effect which they are producing on our understanding about human nature and life, as well as the context of the emergence of bioethics, traditionally conceived of as a critical and analytical example of the relationship between technology and humanity. As an alternative way of explaining these relationships, it outlines the aspect of bioethics as a network effect, in which the technology-society hybrid is shown both in the building of bioethical norms and in the instabilities which challenge these norms. As a way of understanding this heterogeneous and complex network, Controversy Analysis is proposed as a methodological tool. In order to illustrate the richness of such perspective, a brief empirical study is presented, in which an attempt is made to track controversies articulated around the relations between bioethics and reproduction biotechnologies, with a specific focus on stem cell research, as published by the on-line media from January of 2004 until July of 2006, raising questions about subjects such as: life, humanity, artifice and autonomy. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.906 |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/reciis.v1i2.906 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906/1549 https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/906/1616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2007) Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 2 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 2 (2007) 1981-6278 reponame:RECIIS (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
collection |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reciis@icict.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798942464088735744 |