TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | RECIIS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882 |
Resumo: | The vast majority of the world’s biological resources and traditional knowledge is located in the developing world, yet the vast majority of the world’s intellectual property over biotechnology is owned by the developed world. Since the formation of the WTO the developing world has supported the developed world’s demands for stronger intellectual property protection. However, as it now seeks the support of the developed world to exploit these resources, it finds that the developed world has only responded with overtures of bilateralism. Furthermore, the expected increases in foreign direct investment have not materialised, yet have continued to flow to China, a country that is the world’s largest producer of counterfeit goods. In this paper, Luigi Palombi discusses TRIPS, post-TRIPS bilateralism and patents in the context of biological resources and traditional knowledge and seeks to provide a solution to the present intellectual property deadlock between the developed and developing worlds. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-6_2a480fb5f57706a83b11bb42779da182 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/882 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-6 |
network_name_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About ItTRIPS, bilateralismo e patentes: o desapontamento dos mundos desenvolvido e em desenvolvimento e o que fazerTRIPStraditional knowledgepatentssui generisbilateralismTRIPSconhecimento tradicionalpatentessui generisbilateralismo The vast majority of the world’s biological resources and traditional knowledge is located in the developing world, yet the vast majority of the world’s intellectual property over biotechnology is owned by the developed world. Since the formation of the WTO the developing world has supported the developed world’s demands for stronger intellectual property protection. However, as it now seeks the support of the developed world to exploit these resources, it finds that the developed world has only responded with overtures of bilateralism. Furthermore, the expected increases in foreign direct investment have not materialised, yet have continued to flow to China, a country that is the world’s largest producer of counterfeit goods. In this paper, Luigi Palombi discusses TRIPS, post-TRIPS bilateralism and patents in the context of biological resources and traditional knowledge and seeks to provide a solution to the present intellectual property deadlock between the developed and developing worlds.A grande maioria dos recursos biológicos mundiais e do conhecimento tradicional está localizada no mundo em desenvolvimento, embora a grande maioria da propriedade intelectual do mundo sobre biotecnologia seja propriedade do mundo desenvolvido. Desde a formação da OMC, o mundo em desenvolvimento apóia as demandas do mundo desenvolvido relativas a uma maior proteção da propriedade intelectual. No entanto, como agora ele busca apoio do mundo desenvolvido para explorar esses recursos, descobre que o mundo desenvolvido somente respondeu com propostas de bilateralismo. Além disso, o aumento do investimento externo direto esperado não se concretizou, ainda que tenha continuado a fluir para a China, um país que é o maior produtor mundial de mercadorias falsificadas. Este artigo discute o TRIPS1 [Acordo sobre Aspectos dos Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual relacionados ao Comércio], o bilateralismo pós-TRIPS e as patentes no contexto dos recursos biológicos e do conhecimento tradicional e busca apresentar uma solução para o impasse atual da propriedade intelectual entre os países desenvolvidos e aqueles em desenvolvimento.Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz)2007-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/88210.29397/reciis.v1i1.882Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2007)Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 1 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 1 (2007)1981-6278reponame:RECIIS (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882/1526https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882/pdf_15Palombi, Luigiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-11T14:24:55Zoai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/882Revistahttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciishttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/oaireciis@icict.fiocruz.br1981-62781981-6278opendoar:2022-08-11T14:24:55RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It TRIPS, bilateralismo e patentes: o desapontamento dos mundos desenvolvido e em desenvolvimento e o que fazer |
title |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
spellingShingle |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It Palombi, Luigi TRIPS traditional knowledge patents sui generis bilateralism TRIPS conhecimento tradicional patentes sui generis bilateralismo |
title_short |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
title_full |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
title_fullStr |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
title_full_unstemmed |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
title_sort |
TRIPS, Bilateralism And Patents: How They Are Failing Both the Developed And The Developing World and What To Do About It |
author |
Palombi, Luigi |
author_facet |
Palombi, Luigi |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Palombi, Luigi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
TRIPS traditional knowledge patents sui generis bilateralism TRIPS conhecimento tradicional patentes sui generis bilateralismo |
topic |
TRIPS traditional knowledge patents sui generis bilateralism TRIPS conhecimento tradicional patentes sui generis bilateralismo |
description |
The vast majority of the world’s biological resources and traditional knowledge is located in the developing world, yet the vast majority of the world’s intellectual property over biotechnology is owned by the developed world. Since the formation of the WTO the developing world has supported the developed world’s demands for stronger intellectual property protection. However, as it now seeks the support of the developed world to exploit these resources, it finds that the developed world has only responded with overtures of bilateralism. Furthermore, the expected increases in foreign direct investment have not materialised, yet have continued to flow to China, a country that is the world’s largest producer of counterfeit goods. In this paper, Luigi Palombi discusses TRIPS, post-TRIPS bilateralism and patents in the context of biological resources and traditional knowledge and seeks to provide a solution to the present intellectual property deadlock between the developed and developing worlds. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-01-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882 10.29397/reciis.v1i1.882 |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29397/reciis.v1i1.882 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882/1526 https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/882/pdf_15 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2007) Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 1 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 1 (2007) 1981-6278 reponame:RECIIS (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
collection |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reciis@icict.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798942464044695552 |