Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | RECIIS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526 |
Resumo: | This article aims at regarding two U.S. research projects that used video as an important tool to collect data: the Fortunoff Video Archive (Yale) and the Shoah Foundation Institute (USC). Although they had similar goals - to provide a collection of testimonies of Nazism victims -, these institutions show distinct manners of conducting their work, such as: what is the most suitable location for the filming? Who could be at the filming? how and to what extent it should be registered the presence of the interviewer? Which "aesthetic" should the scene have? How to establish time in the interview (chronology of events, the interviewee's subjectivity) and how did it relate to what was shown in the video? Such questions, seemingly confined to the immediate context of the research, put into play deeper issues, such as the dispute over the symbolic power, as reflected by the assertion of a certain public image of the so-called "Holocaust survivor", through a struggle of different points of view with regard to the war and regimes of authenticity. Visual dimension was a central aspect, thus the importance of considering the schemes of image on this research. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-6_3a9428b3b4df5e1ea754cf897c9179af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/526 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-6 |
network_name_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in disputeRegimes de imagem e poder simbólico: notas sobre algumas concepções de entrevista em disputainterviewaudio-visualmemoryHolocaustentrevistaaudiovisualmemóriaHolocaustoThis article aims at regarding two U.S. research projects that used video as an important tool to collect data: the Fortunoff Video Archive (Yale) and the Shoah Foundation Institute (USC). Although they had similar goals - to provide a collection of testimonies of Nazism victims -, these institutions show distinct manners of conducting their work, such as: what is the most suitable location for the filming? Who could be at the filming? how and to what extent it should be registered the presence of the interviewer? Which "aesthetic" should the scene have? How to establish time in the interview (chronology of events, the interviewee's subjectivity) and how did it relate to what was shown in the video? Such questions, seemingly confined to the immediate context of the research, put into play deeper issues, such as the dispute over the symbolic power, as reflected by the assertion of a certain public image of the so-called "Holocaust survivor", through a struggle of different points of view with regard to the war and regimes of authenticity. Visual dimension was a central aspect, thus the importance of considering the schemes of image on this research.Este artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre duas experiências norte-americanas de pesquisa que utilizaram o vídeo como um importante instrumento de coleta de dados: o Arquivo Fortunoff (Yale) e o Instituto Fundação Shoah (USC). Embora tivessem metas semelhantes - constituir um acervo de depoimentos de vítimas do nazismo -, estas instituições apresentavam discordâncias quanto à condução dos trabalhos, tais como: qual o local mais adequado para a filmagem? Quem poderia estar presente? Como e em que medida deveria ser registrada a presença do entrevistador? Que "estética" deveria ter a cena apresentada? Como estabelecer a temporalidade da entrevista (cronologia dos acontecimentos, subjetividade do entrevistado) e como isto se traduzia no que era mostrado no vídeo? Estas perguntas, aparentemente circunscritas ao contexto imediato da pesquisa, colocavam em jogo questões mais profundas como a disputa pelo poder simbólico, traduzida pela afirmação de certa imagem pública do chamado "sobrevivente do Holocausto", pela luta entre diferentes visões sobre a guerra e entre regimes de autenticidade. A dimensão da visualidade era um aspecto central, demonstrando a importância de se refletir sobre os regimes de imagem na pesquisaInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz)2011-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/52610.3395/reciis.v5i2.526Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2011)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2011)Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 5 No 2 (2011)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 5 n. 2 (2011)1981-6278reponame:RECIIS (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526/1171https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526/pdf_256Lerner, Kátiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-06-08T19:41:00Zoai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/526Revistahttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciishttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/oaireciis@icict.fiocruz.br1981-62781981-6278opendoar:2015-06-08T19:41RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute Regimes de imagem e poder simbólico: notas sobre algumas concepções de entrevista em disputa |
title |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
spellingShingle |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute Lerner, Kátia interview audio-visual memory Holocaust entrevista audiovisual memória Holocausto |
title_short |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
title_full |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
title_fullStr |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
title_full_unstemmed |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
title_sort |
Schemes of image and symbolic power: notes on some conceptions of interview in dispute |
author |
Lerner, Kátia |
author_facet |
Lerner, Kátia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lerner, Kátia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
interview audio-visual memory Holocaust entrevista audiovisual memória Holocausto |
topic |
interview audio-visual memory Holocaust entrevista audiovisual memória Holocausto |
description |
This article aims at regarding two U.S. research projects that used video as an important tool to collect data: the Fortunoff Video Archive (Yale) and the Shoah Foundation Institute (USC). Although they had similar goals - to provide a collection of testimonies of Nazism victims -, these institutions show distinct manners of conducting their work, such as: what is the most suitable location for the filming? Who could be at the filming? how and to what extent it should be registered the presence of the interviewer? Which "aesthetic" should the scene have? How to establish time in the interview (chronology of events, the interviewee's subjectivity) and how did it relate to what was shown in the video? Such questions, seemingly confined to the immediate context of the research, put into play deeper issues, such as the dispute over the symbolic power, as reflected by the assertion of a certain public image of the so-called "Holocaust survivor", through a struggle of different points of view with regard to the war and regimes of authenticity. Visual dimension was a central aspect, thus the importance of considering the schemes of image on this research. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526 10.3395/reciis.v5i2.526 |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/reciis.v5i2.526 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526/1171 https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/526/pdf_256 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2011) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2011) Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 5 No 2 (2011) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 5 n. 2 (2011) 1981-6278 reponame:RECIIS (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
collection |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reciis@icict.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798942461701128192 |