Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garbaccio, Juliana Ladeira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Adriana Cristina, Gama, Amanda Laís Gonçalves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/700
Resumo: Objective: to evaluate the knowledge and practices of instrument processing by manicurists/pedicurists in beauty salons in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Method: This was a survey-type cross-sectional research with manicurists/pedicurists, between June 2012 and March 2013 in 235 beauty salons in Brazil. The answers were categorized using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, by means of descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-Squared or Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariate binary logistic regression, to analyze the influence of sociodemographic variables. Results: The majority (68.1%) correctly defined sterilization; however, the adherence to moist heat (autoclave) was low (35.3%). The temperature and the exposure time to sterilization methods varied, with the majority (44.7%) citing a minimum of 200°C for 60 to 90 minutes (32.8%). The respondents reported reusing disposable instruments with their customers, but pointed out individual use of instruments as the correct procedure (90.6%). Conclusion: Despite their knowledge, professionals practice was inappropriate regarding instrument processing, which can place their own health and that of their customers at risk.
id FIOCRUZ-9_06443206908cbc28dc1ffacd0a534365
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/700
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicuristsInstrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicuristsBeauty and Aesthetics CentersPodiatryExposure To Biological AgentsUniversal PrecautionsSterilizationObjective: to evaluate the knowledge and practices of instrument processing by manicurists/pedicurists in beauty salons in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Method: This was a survey-type cross-sectional research with manicurists/pedicurists, between June 2012 and March 2013 in 235 beauty salons in Brazil. The answers were categorized using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, by means of descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-Squared or Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariate binary logistic regression, to analyze the influence of sociodemographic variables. Results: The majority (68.1%) correctly defined sterilization; however, the adherence to moist heat (autoclave) was low (35.3%). The temperature and the exposure time to sterilization methods varied, with the majority (44.7%) citing a minimum of 200°C for 60 to 90 minutes (32.8%). The respondents reported reusing disposable instruments with their customers, but pointed out individual use of instruments as the correct procedure (90.6%). Conclusion: Despite their knowledge, professionals practice was inappropriate regarding instrument processing, which can place their own health and that of their customers at risk.Título PT: Processamento de instrumentos: conhecimento e prática entre manicures/pedicuresObjetivo: Avaliar os conhecimentos e práticas de tratamento dos instrumentos utilizados por manicures/pedicures em salões de beleza na cidade de Belo Horizonte, Brasil. Método: Pesquisa transversal, do tipo inquérito com manicures/pedicures, entre junho de 2012 e março 2013, em 235 salões de beleza. As respostas foram categorizadas e analisadas utilizando o programa Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, por meio de estatísticas descritivas, de Pearson teste exato de Fisher, Qui quadrado ou/e regressão logística binária multivariada para analisar a influência das variáveis sociodemográficas. Resultados: A maioria (68,1%) definiu esterilização corretamente. No entanto, a adesão ao calor úmido (autoclave) era baixa (35,3%). A temperatura e o tempo de exposição para os métodos de esterilização variaram, com a maioria (44,7%) citando um mínimo de 200°C durante 60 a 90 minutos (32,8%). Os entrevistados relataram a reutilização de instrumentos descartáveis com clientes, mas apontou a utilização individual dos instrumentos como o procedimento correto (90,6%). Conclusão: Apesar do conhecimento sobre o tema, a prática dos profissionais era inadequada no que diz ao processamento de instrumentos, o que pode colocar sua própria saúde e a dos clientes em risco.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/70010.3395/2317-269x.00700Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): February; 64-69Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2016): Febrero; 64-69Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 1 (2016): Fevereiro; 64-692317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/700/291Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarbaccio, Juliana LadeiraOliveira, Adriana CristinaGama, Amanda Laís Gonçalves2023-06-27T15:16:43Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/700Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:16:43Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
title Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
spellingShingle Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
Garbaccio, Juliana Ladeira
Beauty and Aesthetics Centers
Podiatry
Exposure To Biological Agents
Universal Precautions
Sterilization
title_short Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
title_full Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
title_fullStr Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
title_full_unstemmed Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
title_sort Instrument processing: knowledge and practice among manicurists/pedicurists
author Garbaccio, Juliana Ladeira
author_facet Garbaccio, Juliana Ladeira
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
Gama, Amanda Laís Gonçalves
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
Gama, Amanda Laís Gonçalves
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garbaccio, Juliana Ladeira
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
Gama, Amanda Laís Gonçalves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beauty and Aesthetics Centers
Podiatry
Exposure To Biological Agents
Universal Precautions
Sterilization
topic Beauty and Aesthetics Centers
Podiatry
Exposure To Biological Agents
Universal Precautions
Sterilization
description Objective: to evaluate the knowledge and practices of instrument processing by manicurists/pedicurists in beauty salons in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Method: This was a survey-type cross-sectional research with manicurists/pedicurists, between June 2012 and March 2013 in 235 beauty salons in Brazil. The answers were categorized using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, by means of descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-Squared or Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariate binary logistic regression, to analyze the influence of sociodemographic variables. Results: The majority (68.1%) correctly defined sterilization; however, the adherence to moist heat (autoclave) was low (35.3%). The temperature and the exposure time to sterilization methods varied, with the majority (44.7%) citing a minimum of 200°C for 60 to 90 minutes (32.8%). The respondents reported reusing disposable instruments with their customers, but pointed out individual use of instruments as the correct procedure (90.6%). Conclusion: Despite their knowledge, professionals practice was inappropriate regarding instrument processing, which can place their own health and that of their customers at risk.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/700
10.3395/2317-269x.00700
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/700
identifier_str_mv 10.3395/2317-269x.00700
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/700/291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): February; 64-69
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2016): Febrero; 64-69
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 1 (2016): Fevereiro; 64-69
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044656418816