Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
DOI: | 10.22239/2317-269X.01403 |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Biovigilance presents a new opportunity for growth and improvement of the donation-transplantation process. Biovigilance is defined as the monitoring and control of procedures involving human cells, tissues and organs, from donation to the clinical evolution of the recipient and the living donor, in order to obtain and provide information on risks and adverse events, and to prevent its occurrence or recurrence. Objective: Describe biovigilance and transplant models and initiatives in Brazil and worldwide. Method: Narrative review of national and international literature on biovigilance and transplantation models in Brazil and worldwide. Results: The risk is present in all stages involving the donation-transplantation process, and implies continuous surveillance. Bio-surveillance initiatives around the world involve institutions such as the World Health Organization and Italy’s National Transplant Centre, which support the sharing of surveillance information published for teaching purposes and for greater public transparency and which, together with Member States of the European Union, aim to support the development and strengthening of the capacity to monitor and control quality, safety and effectiveness in this area. The Australian Government has an initiative that collects information on serious adverse events and reactions related to organ donation and transplantation, but it does not yet have an integrated surveillance system. Brazil, through its National Sanitary Vigilance Agency, has been monitoring the adverse events analysis, but that database needs to be integrated with that of the National Transplantation System. Conclusions: Having National efforts to address international initiatives with the World Health Organization is urgent, thus incorporating measures to implement a culture of quality and safety in the donor-transplant process, with innovative care modelling. It is also necessary to return back to society the high investments done in an efficient and effective manner. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_08c6348e2989ab53677a3b1a7ce0b09a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1403 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
spelling |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative reviewModelos e iniciativas de biovigilância e transplante: uma revisão narrativaBiosurveillanceTissue and Organ ProcurementTransplantPatient SafetyBiovigilânciaObtenção de Tecidos e ÓrgãosTransplanteSegurança do PacienteIntroduction: Biovigilance presents a new opportunity for growth and improvement of the donation-transplantation process. Biovigilance is defined as the monitoring and control of procedures involving human cells, tissues and organs, from donation to the clinical evolution of the recipient and the living donor, in order to obtain and provide information on risks and adverse events, and to prevent its occurrence or recurrence. Objective: Describe biovigilance and transplant models and initiatives in Brazil and worldwide. Method: Narrative review of national and international literature on biovigilance and transplantation models in Brazil and worldwide. Results: The risk is present in all stages involving the donation-transplantation process, and implies continuous surveillance. Bio-surveillance initiatives around the world involve institutions such as the World Health Organization and Italy’s National Transplant Centre, which support the sharing of surveillance information published for teaching purposes and for greater public transparency and which, together with Member States of the European Union, aim to support the development and strengthening of the capacity to monitor and control quality, safety and effectiveness in this area. The Australian Government has an initiative that collects information on serious adverse events and reactions related to organ donation and transplantation, but it does not yet have an integrated surveillance system. Brazil, through its National Sanitary Vigilance Agency, has been monitoring the adverse events analysis, but that database needs to be integrated with that of the National Transplantation System. Conclusions: Having National efforts to address international initiatives with the World Health Organization is urgent, thus incorporating measures to implement a culture of quality and safety in the donor-transplant process, with innovative care modelling. It is also necessary to return back to society the high investments done in an efficient and effective manner.Introdução: A biovigilância apresenta nova oportunidade de melhoria e segurança do processo doação-transplante. A biovigilância é definida como o monitoramento e o controle durante os procedimentos que envolvem células, tecidos e órgãos humanos desde a doação até a evolução clínica do receptor e do doador vivo, com o objetivo de obter e disponibilizar informações sobre riscos e eventos adversos, a fim de prevenir sua ocorrência ou recorrência. Objetivo: Descrever acerca de modelos e iniciativas de biovigilância e transplante no Brasil e no mundo. Método: Revisão narrativa da literatura nacional e internacional. Resultados: O risco está presente em todas as etapas que envolvem a doação-transplante, e implica vigilância contínua. As iniciativas de biovigilância no mundo envolvem instituições como a Organização Mundial da Saúde e o Centro Nacional de Transplantes da Itália, que apoiam o compartilhamento de informações de vigilância publicadas para fins de ensino e para maior transparência pública e que, em conjunto com Estados-membros da União Europeia, têm o objetivo de apoiar o desenvolvimento e ofortalecimento da capacidade de monitorar e controlar a qualidade, a segurança e a eficácia nessa área. O governo australiano possui uma iniciativa que coleta informações sobre eventos adversos graves e reações relacionadas à doação e ao transplante de órgãos, mas ainda não possui um sistema de vigilância integrado. O Brasil, por meio da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, possui acompanhamento da análise eventos adversos, mas os seus bancos de dados, precisam ser integrados àqueles do Sistema Nacional de Transplantes. Conclusões: É premente realizar esforço nacional para atender as inciativas internacionais com a Organização Mundial de Saúde e, assim, incorporar medidas para implementar uma cultura de qualidade e segurança no processo doação-transplante com uma modelagem assistencial inovadora, e devolver à sociedade o alto investimento realizado de modo eficiente e eficaz.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/140310.22239/2317-269X.01403Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 10-16Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 10-16Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 10-162317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403/1093https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403/1140Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRoza, Bartira de AguiarKusahara, Denise MiyukiPessoa, João Luís ErbsTreviso, PatríciaOliveira, Priscilla Caroliny deLeite, Renata FabianaThomé, TadeuAmorim, Maria Helena CostaSchirmer, Janine2023-06-27T15:11:58Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1403Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:58Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review Modelos e iniciativas de biovigilância e transplante: uma revisão narrativa |
title |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
spellingShingle |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review Roza, Bartira de Aguiar Biosurveillance Tissue and Organ Procurement Transplant Patient Safety Biovigilância Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Transplante Segurança do Paciente Roza, Bartira de Aguiar Biosurveillance Tissue and Organ Procurement Transplant Patient Safety Biovigilância Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Transplante Segurança do Paciente |
title_short |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
title_full |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
title_fullStr |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
title_sort |
Biovigilance and transplantation models and initiatives: a narrative review |
author |
Roza, Bartira de Aguiar |
author_facet |
Roza, Bartira de Aguiar Roza, Bartira de Aguiar Kusahara, Denise Miyuki Pessoa, João Luís Erbs Treviso, Patrícia Oliveira, Priscilla Caroliny de Leite, Renata Fabiana Thomé, Tadeu Amorim, Maria Helena Costa Schirmer, Janine Kusahara, Denise Miyuki Pessoa, João Luís Erbs Treviso, Patrícia Oliveira, Priscilla Caroliny de Leite, Renata Fabiana Thomé, Tadeu Amorim, Maria Helena Costa Schirmer, Janine |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kusahara, Denise Miyuki Pessoa, João Luís Erbs Treviso, Patrícia Oliveira, Priscilla Caroliny de Leite, Renata Fabiana Thomé, Tadeu Amorim, Maria Helena Costa Schirmer, Janine |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Roza, Bartira de Aguiar Kusahara, Denise Miyuki Pessoa, João Luís Erbs Treviso, Patrícia Oliveira, Priscilla Caroliny de Leite, Renata Fabiana Thomé, Tadeu Amorim, Maria Helena Costa Schirmer, Janine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biosurveillance Tissue and Organ Procurement Transplant Patient Safety Biovigilância Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Transplante Segurança do Paciente |
topic |
Biosurveillance Tissue and Organ Procurement Transplant Patient Safety Biovigilância Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Transplante Segurança do Paciente |
description |
Introduction: Biovigilance presents a new opportunity for growth and improvement of the donation-transplantation process. Biovigilance is defined as the monitoring and control of procedures involving human cells, tissues and organs, from donation to the clinical evolution of the recipient and the living donor, in order to obtain and provide information on risks and adverse events, and to prevent its occurrence or recurrence. Objective: Describe biovigilance and transplant models and initiatives in Brazil and worldwide. Method: Narrative review of national and international literature on biovigilance and transplantation models in Brazil and worldwide. Results: The risk is present in all stages involving the donation-transplantation process, and implies continuous surveillance. Bio-surveillance initiatives around the world involve institutions such as the World Health Organization and Italy’s National Transplant Centre, which support the sharing of surveillance information published for teaching purposes and for greater public transparency and which, together with Member States of the European Union, aim to support the development and strengthening of the capacity to monitor and control quality, safety and effectiveness in this area. The Australian Government has an initiative that collects information on serious adverse events and reactions related to organ donation and transplantation, but it does not yet have an integrated surveillance system. Brazil, through its National Sanitary Vigilance Agency, has been monitoring the adverse events analysis, but that database needs to be integrated with that of the National Transplantation System. Conclusions: Having National efforts to address international initiatives with the World Health Organization is urgent, thus incorporating measures to implement a culture of quality and safety in the donor-transplant process, with innovative care modelling. It is also necessary to return back to society the high investments done in an efficient and effective manner. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403 10.22239/2317-269X.01403 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403/1093 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1403/1140 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 10-16 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 10-16 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 10-16 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1822182070642802688 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01403 |