Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181
Resumo: Prompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies.
id FIOCRUZ-9_0950a8bef861e308a1f08fe18a04e8e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/181
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysisParticipação social no planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária: uma análise críticaParticipação SocialPlanejamentoVigilância SanitáriaConselho de SaúdeSocial ParticipationPlanningSanitary SurveillanceHealth CouncilPrompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies.Instigado pelos dados apresentados no informe “Perfil da Vigilância Sanitária Municipal no Brasil” da ANVISA, este artigo se propõe a fazer uma análise crítica do processo de “debate” do planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária — VISA. Para tanto, utiliza um estudo de caso realizado no Conselho Municipal de Saúde de Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Foram entrevistados 35 dos 36 membros efetivos do CMSBH: 45,71% dos conselheiros desconhecem o Plano de Ação; 17,14% não desconhecem totalmente o Plano de Ação; 17,14% não conhecem o Plano de Ação, mas gostariam de conhecer;5,71% sabem da existência do Plano de Ação e 14,29% conhecem o Plano de Ação. Decorridos 3 anos da realização do estudo de caso, o presente trabalho recorreu à pesquisa documental para revisitar o processo de planejamento de VISA, analisando documentos da ANVISA, atas das reuniões e resoluções do CMSBH e o Plano Municipal de Saúde 2010- 2013. Parte-se das recomendações do estudo de caso em busca de avanços e desafios desse processo. Evidencia-se a necessidade de fomentar um permanente debate entre a sociedade e a VISA. Esse debate pode-se dar através do exercício da participação e controle social do processo de formulação da Política Municipal de Vigilância Sanitária.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2014-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/18110.3395/vd.v2n2.181Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): May; 9-16Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014): Puede; 9-16Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 2 (2014): Maio; 9-162317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181/123Copyright (c) 2014 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Ana Maria CaldeiraDallari, Sueli Gandolfi2023-06-27T14:56:37Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/181Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:56:37Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
Participação social no planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária: uma análise crítica
title Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
spellingShingle Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira
Participação Social
Planejamento
Vigilância Sanitária
Conselho de Saúde
Social Participation
Planning
Sanitary Surveillance
Health Council
title_short Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
title_full Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
title_fullStr Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
title_sort Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
author Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira
author_facet Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira
Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi
author_role author
author2 Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira
Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participação Social
Planejamento
Vigilância Sanitária
Conselho de Saúde
Social Participation
Planning
Sanitary Surveillance
Health Council
topic Participação Social
Planejamento
Vigilância Sanitária
Conselho de Saúde
Social Participation
Planning
Sanitary Surveillance
Health Council
description Prompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181
10.3395/vd.v2n2.181
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181
identifier_str_mv 10.3395/vd.v2n2.181
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181/123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): May; 9-16
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014): Puede; 9-16
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 2 (2014): Maio; 9-16
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042043446362112