Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
DOI: | 10.3395/vd.v2n2.181 |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181 |
Resumo: | Prompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_0950a8bef861e308a1f08fe18a04e8e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/181 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
spelling |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysisParticipação social no planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária: uma análise críticaParticipação SocialPlanejamentoVigilância SanitáriaConselho de SaúdeSocial ParticipationPlanningSanitary SurveillanceHealth CouncilPrompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies.Instigado pelos dados apresentados no informe “Perfil da Vigilância Sanitária Municipal no Brasil” da ANVISA, este artigo se propõe a fazer uma análise crítica do processo de “debate” do planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária — VISA. Para tanto, utiliza um estudo de caso realizado no Conselho Municipal de Saúde de Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Foram entrevistados 35 dos 36 membros efetivos do CMSBH: 45,71% dos conselheiros desconhecem o Plano de Ação; 17,14% não desconhecem totalmente o Plano de Ação; 17,14% não conhecem o Plano de Ação, mas gostariam de conhecer;5,71% sabem da existência do Plano de Ação e 14,29% conhecem o Plano de Ação. Decorridos 3 anos da realização do estudo de caso, o presente trabalho recorreu à pesquisa documental para revisitar o processo de planejamento de VISA, analisando documentos da ANVISA, atas das reuniões e resoluções do CMSBH e o Plano Municipal de Saúde 2010- 2013. Parte-se das recomendações do estudo de caso em busca de avanços e desafios desse processo. Evidencia-se a necessidade de fomentar um permanente debate entre a sociedade e a VISA. Esse debate pode-se dar através do exercício da participação e controle social do processo de formulação da Política Municipal de Vigilância Sanitária.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2014-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/18110.3395/vd.v2n2.181Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): May; 9-16Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014): Puede; 9-16Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 2 (2014): Maio; 9-162317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181/123Copyright (c) 2014 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Ana Maria CaldeiraDallari, Sueli Gandolfi2023-06-27T14:56:37Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/181Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:56:37Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis Participação social no planejamento das ações e serviços de vigilância sanitária: uma análise crítica |
title |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
spellingShingle |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira Participação Social Planejamento Vigilância Sanitária Conselho de Saúde Social Participation Planning Sanitary Surveillance Health Council Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira Participação Social Planejamento Vigilância Sanitária Conselho de Saúde Social Participation Planning Sanitary Surveillance Health Council |
title_short |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
title_full |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
title_fullStr |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
title_sort |
Social Participation in planning of the activities and services of health surveillance : a critical analysis |
author |
Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Ana Maria Caldeira Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Participação Social Planejamento Vigilância Sanitária Conselho de Saúde Social Participation Planning Sanitary Surveillance Health Council |
topic |
Participação Social Planejamento Vigilância Sanitária Conselho de Saúde Social Participation Planning Sanitary Surveillance Health Council |
description |
Prompted by the data presented in the ANVISA’S preliminary report “Profile of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil”, this article aims to make a critical analysis of the “debate”. About the planning of actions and Health Surveillance - VISA services . To achieve these objectives, it uses a case study conducted at the City Health Council of Belo Horizonte — CMSBH. Thirty five of the thirty six sitting members of CMSBH were interviewed, with the following results: 45.71% of the board members are unaware of the Plan of Action; 17:14% of them did not fully know the Plan of Action; 17:14% did not know the Plan of Action, but would like to know; 5.71% know of the existence of the Plan of Action and 14.29% know the Plan of Action. After three years of the completion of the case study, this paper resorted to documentary research to revisit the planning process of VISA, analyzing ANVISA’s documents, minutes of meetings and resolutions of CMSBH and Municipal Health Plan 2010-2013. From the recommendations of the study this paper seeks to find the progress and challenges of the process. It becomes clear the necessity of promoting a constant debate between the VISA and the society. This debate can occur through the exercise of social participation and control of the process of the formulation of Municipal Sanitary Surveillance’ policies. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-05-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181 10.3395/vd.v2n2.181 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/vd.v2n2.181 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/181/123 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): May; 9-16 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014): Puede; 9-16 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 2 (2014): Maio; 9-16 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1822181985317027840 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.3395/vd.v2n2.181 |