Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Managing medical device risks is an activity that spans all phases of the life cycle of the product and is essential for the products available for use to behave effectively and safely. Objective: To discuss on the post-marketing surveillance model of medical device (technovigilance) in Brazil, present international experiences and reflect on their insertion in risk management. Method: Narrative review, based on regulations published on institutional sites and on texts published from 2000 on the Portal Capes, Virtual Health Library, SciELO and on the bases Bireme, ScienceDirect and Pubmed, in which technovigilance is presented as the action of State and as part of risk management in health services. Results: Different countries adopt the registration and inspection of good manufacturing practices as a way to regulate devices, which does not exhaust the risk assessment. Notification of medical devices related problems is one of the post-market surveillance strategies, in addition to cross-country information exchange, technology assessment studies, active surveillance in health services, and aggregating actual behavioral data during use. Conclusions: The technological advancement and incremental changes of DM challenge the State to review risk assessment criteria based on pre-market data, aggregating post-market related data, enabling risk identification and event chain intervention. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_0f302e5242478f4774fbf0f7ae1e3c53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1359 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategyRegulação de dispositivos médicos: vigilância pós-mercado como estratégia de gerenciamento de riscosTechnovigilanceRisk ManagementMedical DevicesHealth SurveillanceTecnovigilânciaGerenciamento de RiscoDispositivos MédicosVigilância SanitáriaIntroduction: Managing medical device risks is an activity that spans all phases of the life cycle of the product and is essential for the products available for use to behave effectively and safely. Objective: To discuss on the post-marketing surveillance model of medical device (technovigilance) in Brazil, present international experiences and reflect on their insertion in risk management. Method: Narrative review, based on regulations published on institutional sites and on texts published from 2000 on the Portal Capes, Virtual Health Library, SciELO and on the bases Bireme, ScienceDirect and Pubmed, in which technovigilance is presented as the action of State and as part of risk management in health services. Results: Different countries adopt the registration and inspection of good manufacturing practices as a way to regulate devices, which does not exhaust the risk assessment. Notification of medical devices related problems is one of the post-market surveillance strategies, in addition to cross-country information exchange, technology assessment studies, active surveillance in health services, and aggregating actual behavioral data during use. Conclusions: The technological advancement and incremental changes of DM challenge the State to review risk assessment criteria based on pre-market data, aggregating post-market related data, enabling risk identification and event chain intervention.Introdução: Gerenciar riscos de dispositivos médicos é uma atividade que perpassa todas as fases do ciclo de vida, sendo essencial para que os produtos disponíveis para uso se comportem de maneira efetiva e segura. Objetivo: Discutir o modelo de vigilância pós-comercialização de dispositivos médicos (tecnovigilância) no Brasil, apresentar experiências internacionais e refletir sobre sua inserção na gestão do risco. Método: Revisão narrativa, com base em regulamentos publicados em sítios institucionais e em textos publicados a partir do ano 2000 no Portal Capes, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, SciELO e nas bases Bireme, ScienceDirect e Pubmed, em que a tecnovigilância é apresentada como ação do Estado e como parte do gerenciamento de risco em serviços de saúde. Resultados: Diferentes países adotam o registro e a inspeção de boas práticas de fabricação como formas de regularização de produtos, o que não esgota a avaliação do risco. A notificação de problemas relacionados aos dispositivos médicos é uma das estratégias de vigilância pós-mercado, que se soma ao intercâmbio de informações entre países, a estudos de avaliação de tecnologias e à vigilância ativa nos serviços de saúde, agregando dados reais do comportamento durante o uso. Conclusões: O avanço tecnológico e as mudanças incrementais destes produtos desafiam o Estado a rever critérios de avaliação de riscos baseado em dados pré-mercado, agregando dados relacionados ao pós-mercado, possibilitando a identificação de riscos e intervenção na cadeia de acontecimentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-11-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/135910.22239/2317-269X.01359Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 67-76Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 67-76Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 67-762317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359/1101https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359/1177Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelchior, Stela CandiotoWaissmann, William2023-06-27T15:11:58Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1359Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:58Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy Regulação de dispositivos médicos: vigilância pós-mercado como estratégia de gerenciamento de riscos |
title |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
spellingShingle |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy Melchior, Stela Candioto Technovigilance Risk Management Medical Devices Health Surveillance Tecnovigilância Gerenciamento de Risco Dispositivos Médicos Vigilância Sanitária |
title_short |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
title_full |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
title_fullStr |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
title_sort |
Regulation of medical devices: post market surveillance as risk management strategy |
author |
Melchior, Stela Candioto |
author_facet |
Melchior, Stela Candioto Waissmann, William |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Waissmann, William |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melchior, Stela Candioto Waissmann, William |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Technovigilance Risk Management Medical Devices Health Surveillance Tecnovigilância Gerenciamento de Risco Dispositivos Médicos Vigilância Sanitária |
topic |
Technovigilance Risk Management Medical Devices Health Surveillance Tecnovigilância Gerenciamento de Risco Dispositivos Médicos Vigilância Sanitária |
description |
Introduction: Managing medical device risks is an activity that spans all phases of the life cycle of the product and is essential for the products available for use to behave effectively and safely. Objective: To discuss on the post-marketing surveillance model of medical device (technovigilance) in Brazil, present international experiences and reflect on their insertion in risk management. Method: Narrative review, based on regulations published on institutional sites and on texts published from 2000 on the Portal Capes, Virtual Health Library, SciELO and on the bases Bireme, ScienceDirect and Pubmed, in which technovigilance is presented as the action of State and as part of risk management in health services. Results: Different countries adopt the registration and inspection of good manufacturing practices as a way to regulate devices, which does not exhaust the risk assessment. Notification of medical devices related problems is one of the post-market surveillance strategies, in addition to cross-country information exchange, technology assessment studies, active surveillance in health services, and aggregating actual behavioral data during use. Conclusions: The technological advancement and incremental changes of DM challenge the State to review risk assessment criteria based on pre-market data, aggregating post-market related data, enabling risk identification and event chain intervention. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359 10.22239/2317-269X.01359 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01359 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359/1101 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1359/1177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 67-76 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 67-76 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 67-76 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045432365056 |